IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i20p5639-d275954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS-Based Site Selection for Check Dams in Watersheds: Considering Geomorphometric and Topo-Hydrological Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Omid Rahmati

    (Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sanandaj 6616936311, Iran)

  • Zahra Kalantari

    (Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Mahmood Samadi

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 31587-77871, Iran)

  • Evelyn Uuemaa

    (Department of Geography, University of Tartu, Vanemuise St. 46, 51003 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Davoud Davoudi Moghaddam

    (Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Khorramabad 68151-44316, Iran)

  • Omid Asadi Nalivan

    (Department of Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan 4918943464, Iran)

  • Georgia Destouni

    (Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Dieu Tien Bui

    (Geographic Information Science Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
    Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam)

Abstract

Check dams are widely used watershed management measures for reducing flood peak discharge and sediment transport, and increasing lag time and groundwater recharge throughout the world. However, identifying the best suitable sites for check dams within the stream networks of various watersheds remains challenging. This study aimed to develop an open-source software with user-friendly interface for screening the stream network possibilities and identifying and guiding the selection of suitable sites for check dams within watersheds. In this developed site selection software (SSS), multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was integrated into geographic information systems (GIS), which allowed for numerous spatial data of the multiple criteria to be relatively simply and visually processed. Different geomorphometric and topo-hydrological factors were considered and accounted for to enhance the SSS identification of the best locations for check dams. The factors included topographic wetness index (TWI), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), topographic position index (TPI), sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), slope, drainage density (DD), and stream order (SO). The site identification performance of the SSS was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method, with results for the case study example of the Poldokhtar watershed in Iran showing excellent performance and identifying 327 potential sites for efficient check dam construction in this watershed. The SSS tool is not site-specific but is rather general, adaptive, and comprehensive, such that it can and should be further applied and tested across different watersheds and parts of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Omid Rahmati & Zahra Kalantari & Mahmood Samadi & Evelyn Uuemaa & Davoud Davoudi Moghaddam & Omid Asadi Nalivan & Georgia Destouni & Dieu Tien Bui, 2019. "GIS-Based Site Selection for Check Dams in Watersheds: Considering Geomorphometric and Topo-Hydrological Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5639-:d:275954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5639/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5639/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imran Jamali & Ulla Mörtberg & Bo Olofsson & Muhammad Shafique, 2014. "A Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis Approach for Locating Suitable Sites for Construction of Subsurface Dams in Northern Pakistan," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(14), pages 5157-5174, November.
    2. Chang-Jo Chung & Andrea Fabbri, 2003. "Validation of Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazard Mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 451-472, November.
    3. Voinov, Alexey & Gaddis, Erica J. Brown, 2008. "Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 197-207.
    4. Pathak, P. & Sudi, R. & Wani, S.P. & Sahrawat, K.L., 2013. "Hydrological behavior of Alfisols and Vertisols in the semi-arid zone: Implications for soil and water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 12-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfredo Fernández-Enríquez & María Luisa Pérez-Cayeiro & Giorgio Anfuso, 2022. "GIS Modeling to Climate Change Adaptation by Reducing Evaporation in Water Reservoirs: Smart Location Technique of Minimal Evaporation Reservoirs (GIS-MER)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Sandoval-Solis & Jose Pablo Ortiz Partida & Lindsay Floyd, 2022. "Multi-Objective Water Planning in a Poor Water Data Region: Aragvi River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. D. Costanzo & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & E. Rotigliano, 2012. "Exporting a Google Earth ™ aided earth-flow susceptibility model: a test in central Sicily," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 103-114, March.
    3. E. Rotigliano & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & D. Costanzo & V. Agnesi, 2012. "Slope units-based flow susceptibility model: using validation tests to select controlling factors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 143-153, March.
    4. Jose-Luis Molina & Sergio Martos-Rosillo & Crisanto Martín-Montañés & Suzanne Pierce, 2012. "The Social Sustainable Aquifer Yield: An Indicator for the Analysis and Assessment of the Integrated Aquifers Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(10), pages 2951-2971, August.
    5. Kourosh Shirani & Mehrdad Pasandi & Alireza Arabameri, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster–Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1379-1418, September.
    6. Gregory Hill & Steven Kolmes & Michael Humphreys & Rebecca McLain & Eric T. Jones, 2019. "Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 170-186, June.
    7. de Jong, Stefan P.L. & Wardenaar, Tjerk & Horlings, Edwin, 2016. "Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: A quantitative study of two climate research programmes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1397-1409.
    8. Höltinger, Stefan & Salak, Boris & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Scherhaufer, Patrick & Schmidt, Johannes, 2016. "Austria's wind energy potential – A participatory modeling approach to assess socio-political and market acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 49-61.
    9. Sondoss Elsawah & Elena Bakhanova & Raimo P. Hämäläinen & Alexey Voinov, 2023. "A Competency Framework for Participatory Modeling," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 569-601, June.
    10. Netra Bhandary & Ranjan Dahal & Manita Timilsina & Ryuichi Yatabe, 2013. "Rainfall event-based landslide susceptibility zonation mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 365-388, October.
    11. Elena Bakhanova & Jaime A. Garcia & William L. Raffe & Alexey Voinov, 2023. "Gamification Framework for Participatory Modeling: A Proposal," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1167-1182, October.
    12. Anantha, K.H. & Garg, Kaushal K. & Barron, Jennie & Dixit, Sreenath & Venkataradha, A. & Singh, Ramesh & Whitbread, Anthony M., 2021. "Impact of best management practices on sustainable crop production and climate resilience in smallholder farming systems of South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    13. Bottero, Marta & Bravi, Marina & Caprioli, Caterina & Dell'Anna, Federico, 2023. "Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences to design a new urban park in a metropolitan area of North-Western Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    14. Kamdi, Prasad Jairam & Swain, Dillip Kumar & Wani, Suhas P., 2023. "Developing climate change agro-adaptation strategies through field experiments and simulation analyses for sustainable sorghum production in semi-arid tropics of India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    15. Alejandro Gonzalez-Ollauri & Slobodan B. Mickovski, 2021. "A Simple GIS-Based Tool for the Detection of Landslide-Prone Zones on a Coastal Slope in Scotland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Massimo Conforti & Pietro Aucelli & Gaetano Robustelli & Fabio Scarciglia, 2011. "Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 881-898, March.
    17. Nikolaos Tavoularis & George Papathanassiou & Athanassios Ganas & Panagiotis Argyrakis, 2021. "Development of the Landslide Susceptibility Map of Attica Region, Greece, Based on the Method of Rock Engineering System," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, February.
    18. Paulo Rodolpho Pereira Hader & Fábio Augusto Gomes Vieira Reis & Anna Silvia Palcheco Peixoto, 2022. "Landslide risk assessment considering socionatural factors: methodology and application to Cubatão municipality, São Paulo, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1273-1304, January.
    19. Soulis, Konstantinos X. & Manolakos, Dimitris & Anagnostopoulos, John & Papantonis, Dimitris, 2016. "Development of a geo-information system embedding a spatially distributed hydrological model for the preliminary assessment of the hydropower potential of historical hydro sites in poorly gauged areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 222-232.
    20. Pereverza, Kateryna & Pasichnyi, Oleksii & Kordas, Olga, 2019. "Modular participatory backcasting: A unifying framework for strategic planning in the heating sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 123-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5639-:d:275954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.