IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5325-d271064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Dominant Trip Distance for Intercity Passenger Transport Mode Using Large-Scale Location-Based Service Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Xiang

    (College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, 99 Ziyang Avenue, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Chengcheng Xu

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Si Pai Lou, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Weijie Yu

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Si Pai Lou, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Shuyi Wang

    (Suning Financial Group, Suning Road, Nanjing 210000, China)

  • Xuedong Hua

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Si Pai Lou, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Si Pai Lou, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

Intercity transport systems have been plagued by low efficiency and overutilization for a long time, due to unhealthy competition among multi-transport modes. Hence, this study aims to estimate the dominant trip distance of intercity passenger transport modes to optimize the allocation of intercity passenger transport resources and improve the efficiency of intercity transport systems. Dominant trip distance was classified into two types: Absolute dominant trip distance and relative dominant trip distance; and their respective models were developed using passenger transport mode share functions and fitting curves. Particularly, the big data of intercity passenger transport mode share rate of more than 360 cities in China was obtained using a network crawler and each passenger transport mode share function and their curves were proposed. Furthermore, the dominant trip distances estimation models of intercity passenger transport were developed and solved. The results show that there are significant differences in dominant trip distance between the transport modes. For example, the absolute and relative dominant trip distances of highway are 8–119 km and 8–463 km, respectively, while those of airway are 1594–3000 km and 2477–3000 km, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Xiang & Chengcheng Xu & Weijie Yu & Shuyi Wang & Xuedong Hua & Wei Wang, 2019. "Investigating Dominant Trip Distance for Intercity Passenger Transport Mode Using Large-Scale Location-Based Service Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5325-:d:271064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oum, Tae H. & Gillen, David W., 1983. "The structure of intercity travel demands in Canada: Theory tests and empirical results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 175-191, June.
    2. Marc Ivaldi & Catherine Vibes, 2008. "Price Competition in the Intercity Passenger Transport Market: A Simulation Model," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 42(2), pages 225-254, May.
    3. Román, Concepción & Espino, Raquel & Martín, Juan Carlos, 2007. "Competition of high-speed train with air transport: The case of Madrid–Barcelona," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 277-284.
    4. Müller, Sven & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Haase, Knut, 2008. "Travel-to-school mode choice modelling and patterns of school choice in urban areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 342-357.
    5. Xianyuan Zhan & Satish Ukkusuri & Feng Zhu, 2014. "Inferring Urban Land Use Using Large-Scale Social Media Check-in Data," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 647-667, December.
    6. Arbués, Pelayo & Baños, José F. & Mayor, Matías & Suárez, Patricia, 2016. "Determinants of ground transport modal choice in long-distance trips in Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 131-143.
    7. Fredrik Carlsson, 2003. "The demand for intercity public transport: the case of business passengers," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 41-50.
    8. Borja Moya-Gómez & María Henar Salas-Olmedo & Juan Carlos García-Palomares & Javier Gutiérrez, 2018. "Dynamic Accessibility using Big Data: The Role of the Changing Conditions of Network Congestion and Destination Attractiveness," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 273-290, June.
    9. Alexander Lyall Morton, 1972. "Intermodal Competition for the Intercity Transport of Manufactures," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 48(4), pages 357-366.
    10. Scheiner, Joachim, 2010. "Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: trends in Germany 1976–2002," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 75-84.
    11. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.
    12. Weiyang Zhang & Ben Derudder & Jianghao Wang & Wei Shen & Frank Witlox, 2016. "Using Location-Based Social Media to Chart the Patterns of People Moving between Cities: The Case of Weibo-Users in the Yangtze River Delta," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 91-111, July.
    13. Espino, Raquel & de Dios Ortúzar, Juan & Román, Concepción, 2007. "Understanding suburban travel demand: Flexible modelling with revealed and stated choice data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 899-912, December.
    14. Eui-Hwan Chung & Amer Shalaby, 2005. "A Trip Reconstruction Tool for GPS-based Personal Travel Surveys," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 381-401, August.
    15. Kang, Yong-Soon & Herr, Paul M & Page, Christine M, 2003. "Time and Distance: Asymmetries in Consumer Trip Knowledge and Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 420-429, December.
    16. Ahern, Aoife A. & Tapley, Nigel, 2008. "The use of stated preference techniques to model modal choices on interurban trips in Ireland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 15-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaofei Ye & Min Li & Zhongzhen Yang & Xingchen Yan & Jun Chen, 2020. "A Dynamic Adjustment Model of Cruising Taxicab Fleet Size Combined the Operating and Flied Survey Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Bojan Jovanović & Kamer Shabanaj & Marko Ševrović, 2022. "Conceptual Model for Determining the Statistical Significance of Predictive Indicators for Bus Transit Demand Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaroslav Burian & Lenka Zajíčková & Igor Ivan & Karel Macků, 2018. "Attitudes and Motivation to Use Public or Individual Transport: A Case Study of Two Middle-Sized Cities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Roberto Sañudo & Eneko Echaniz & Borja Alonso & Rubén Cordera, 2019. "Addressing the Importance of Service Attributes in Railways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Yue Liu & Jun Chen & Weiguang Wu & Jiao Ye, 2019. "Typical Combined Travel Mode Choice Utility Model in Multimodal Transportation Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Paha, Johannes & Rompf, Dirk & Warnecke, Christiane, 2013. "Customer choice patterns in passenger rail competition," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 209-227.
    5. Yun Wang & Xuedong Yan & Yu Zhou & Qingwan Xue, 2017. "Influencing Mechanism of Potential Factors on Passengers’ Long-Distance Travel Mode Choices Based on Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Wang, Wei & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun, 2020. "How does the decision of high-speed rail operator affect social welfare? Considering competition between high-speed rail and air transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Van Acker, Veronique & Kessels, Roselinde & Palhazi Cuervo, Daniel & Lannoo, Steven & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Preferences for long-distance coach transport: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 759-779.
    8. Helena Resano‐Ezcaray & Ana Isabel Sanjuán‐López & Luis Miguel Albisu‐Aguado, 2010. "Combining Stated and Revealed Preferences on Typical Food Products: The Case of Dry‐Cured Ham in Spain," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 480-498, September.
    9. F. Crawford & D. P. Watling & R. D. Connors, 2023. "Analysing Spatial Intrapersonal Variability of Road Users Using Point-to-Point Sensor Data," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 373-406, June.
    10. Jiang, Changmin & Zhang, Anming, 2016. "Airline network choice and market coverage under high-speed rail competition," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 248-260.
    11. Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M., 2011. "Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 63-79, January.
    12. Qihao Liu & Yuzheng Liu & Chia-Lin Chen & Enrica Papa & Yantao Ling & Mengqiu Cao, 2023. "Is It Possible to Compete With Car Use? How Buses Can Facilitate Sustainable Transport," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 69-83.
    13. Meng, Xuechen & Lin, Shanlang & Zhu, Xiaochuan, 2018. "The resource redistribution effect of high-speed rail stations on the economic growth of neighbouring regions: Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 178-191.
    14. Zwerts, Enid & Allaert, Georges & Janssens, Davy & Wets, Geert & Witlox, Frank, 2010. "How children view their travel behaviour: a case study from Flanders (Belgium)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 702-710.
    15. Elias, Wafa & Katoshevski-Cavari, Rachel, 2014. "The role of socio-economic and environmental characteristics in school-commuting behavior: A comparative study of Jewish and Arab children in Israel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 79-87.
    16. Dan Liu & Zhenghong Deng & Qipeng Sun & Yong Wang & Yinhai Wang, 2019. "Design and Freight Corridor-Fleet Size Choice in Collaborative Intermodal Transportation Network Considering Economies of Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Hakim Hammadou & Claire Papaix, 2015. "Policy packages for modal shift and CO2 reduction in Lille, France," Working Papers 1501, Chaire Economie du climat.
    18. D’Alfonso, Tiziana & Jiang, Changmin & Bracaglia, Valentina, 2016. "Air transport and high-speed rail competition: Environmental implications and mitigation strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 261-276.
    19. Jason Monios & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2014. "The Impact of Container Type Diversification on Regional British Port Development Strategies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 583-606, September.
    20. Tsunoda, Yushi, 2018. "Transportation policy for high-speed rail competing with airlines," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 350-360.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5325-:d:271064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.