IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4744-d262516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Diverse Expectations of Stakeholders in Industrial Land Redevelopment Projects in China: The Case of Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Fang He

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Siping Road 1500, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Wendong Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Siping Road 1500, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Taozhi Zhuang

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Yuan Yi

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Siping Road 1500, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

In China, while large-scale industrial land redevelopment has played a significant role in promoting economic growth, it has also triggered a series of unsustainable problems. To date, few studies have explored the expectations of stakeholders in industrial redevelopment projects in China. Gaining an in-depth understanding of the diverse expectations among core stakeholders is an essential step towards realizing social sustainability. This study aims to analyze these diverse expectations in industrial land redevelopment projects. For this purpose, 19 factors were identified and compared across the following core stakeholders: local governments, consulting experts, the general public, and original land users of state-led redevelopment and land user-led redevelopment projects, using questionnaires and interviews conducted in Shanghai, China. The findings show there to be tremendous differences between the expectations of different stakeholder groups in terms of economic, social and environmental aspects. Major differences were also found between the expectations of original land users across different project types. Moreover, the negative externalities, the balance between industrial and residential space, the diverse needs of original land users in different project types, and the barriers to stakeholders’ participation, in industrial land redevelopment in China were discussed. The findings of the current paper are conducive to optimizing stakeholder participation in industrial land redevelopment so as to enhance social sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang He & Wendong Wu & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2019. "Exploring the Diverse Expectations of Stakeholders in Industrial Land Redevelopment Projects in China: The Case of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4744-:d:262516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lesley Hemphill & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2004. "An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 1, Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Framework," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 725-755, April.
    2. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: II. A case study of the redevelopment of a local state-owned enterprise in Nanjing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 372-380.
    3. Berta, Mauro & Bottero, Marta & Ferretti, Valentina, 2018. "A mixed methods approach for the integration of urban design and economic evaluation: industrial heritage and urban regeneration in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68032, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Grace Lee & Edwin Chan, 2008. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Assessment of Urban Renewal Proposals," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 155-168, October.
    5. Mauro Berta & Marta Bottero & Valentina Ferretti, 2018. "A mixed methods approach for the integration of urban design and economic evaluation: Industrial heritage and urban regeneration in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(2), pages 208-232, March.
    6. Huub Ploegmakers & Pascal Beckers, 2015. "Evaluating urban regeneration: An assessment of the effectiveness of physical regeneration initiatives on run-down industrial sites in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2151-2169, September.
    7. Chau-kiu Cheung & Kwan-kwok Leung, 2007. "Enhancing life satisfaction by government accountability in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 411-432, July.
    8. Mee Ng, 2005. "Quality of Life Perceptions and Directions for Urban Regeneration in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 441-465, March.
    9. Maria Manta Conroy & Philip R Berke, 2004. "What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan? An Analysis of Factors That Influence Principles of Sustainable Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(8), pages 1381-1396, August.
    10. Stephen Gruneberg, 2007. "Performance-Based Contracting: an alternative approach to transacting in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 111-112.
    11. Chris Shearlock & Phillip James & Jo Phillips, 2000. "Regional sustainable development: are the new regional development agencies armed with the information they require?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 79-88.
    12. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    13. van Duijn, Mark & Rouwendal, Jan & Boersema, Richard, 2016. "Redevelopment of industrial heritage: Insights into external effects on house prices," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 91-107.
    14. Juncheng Dai & Xue Huang & Huasheng Zhu, 2015. "Interpretation of 798: Changes in Power of Representation and Sustainability of Industrial Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Wang, Boyi & Tian, Li & Yao, Zhihao, 2018. "Institutional uncertainty, fragmented urbanization and spatial lock-in of the peri-urban area of China: A case of industrial land redevelopment in Panyu," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 241-249.
    16. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Yuan, Feng, 2017. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 604-613.
    17. Zhang, Zhengfeng & Liu, Jing & Gu, Xiaokun, 2019. "Reduction of industrial land beyond Urban Development Boundary in Shanghai: Differences in policy responses and impact on towns and villages," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 620-630.
    18. Kronenberg, Jakub & Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Agata & Zbieg, Anita & Żak, Błażej, 2016. "Wasting collaboration potential: A study in urban green space governance in a post-transition country," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 69-78.
    19. Mingche M. Li & H. James Brown, 1980. "Micro-Neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 56(2), pages 125-141.
    20. Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Ibrahim & Muhammad Waqas & Abdul Waheed, 2018. "Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wendong Wu & Fang He & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2020. "Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Jihong Li & Kaiming Li & Rongxu Qiu, 2022. "The Suburbanization and Revitalization of Industrial Land in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Bohong Zheng & Francis Masrabaye & Gerald Madjissembaye Guiradoumngué & Jian Zheng & Linlin Liu, 2021. "Progress in Research on Sustainable Urban Renewal Since 2000: Library and Visual Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Rui Han & Daping Liu & Paolo Cornaglia, 2020. "A Study on the Origin of China’s Modern Industrial Architecture and Its Development Strategies of Industrial Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-34, April.
    5. Shiran Zhang & Jiaping Yang & Changdong Ye & Weixuan Chen & Yixuan Li, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Industrial Renovation: Renovation Paths of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taozhi Zhuang & Queena K. Qian & Henk J. Visscher & Marja G. Elsinga, 2017. "Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Wendong Wu & Fang He & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2020. "Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Fan Yang & Peihong Tao & Xiao Cai & Jiayin Wang, 2022. "Transformation for Feature Upgrades or Higher Property Prices: Evidence from Industrial Land Regeneration in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Jinlong Gao & Zhixuan Wu & Jianglong Chen & Wen Chen, 2020. "Beyond the bid‐rent: Two tales of land use transition in contemporary China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1336-1356, September.
    5. Lai, Yani & Tang, Bosin & Chen, Xiangsheng & Zheng, Xian, 2021. "Spatial determinants of land redevelopment in the urban renewal processes in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Zhou, Yulin & Lan, Feng & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "An experience-based mining approach to supporting urban renewal mode decisions under a multi-stakeholder environment in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Sungjo Hong & Ihl Kweon & Bum-Hyun Lee & Heechul Kim, 2019. "Indicators and Assessment System for Sustainability of Municipalities: A Case Study of South Korea’s Assessment of Sustainability of Cities (ASC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Cao, Kexin & Deng, Yu & Wang, Wenxue & Liu, Shenghe, 2023. "The spatial heterogeneity and dynamics of land redevelopment: Evidence from 287 Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Lingfan Yang & Xiaolong Luo & Ziyao Ding & Xiaoman Liu & Zongni Gu, 2022. "Restructuring for Growth in Development Zones, China: A Systematic Literature and Policy Review (1984–2022)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-32, June.
    11. Jin Xie & Yinying Cai & Hang Tang & Yuanqin Liao, 2020. "Housing Wealth Status and Informal Accumulation of Rural Villages at the Rural-Urban Fringe in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Lingyan Huang & Shanshan Xiang & Jianzhuang Zheng, 2022. "Fine-Scale Monitoring of Industrial Land and Its Intra-Structure Using Remote Sensing Images and POIs in the Hangzhou Bay Urban Agglomeration, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessandra Oppio, 2019. "Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Yusra Mouzughi & David Bryde & Maher Al-Shaer, 2014. "The Role of Real Estate in Sustainable Development in Developing Countries: The Case of the Kingdom of Bahrain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Sun, Yifan & Ma, Anbing & Su, Haorui & Su, Shiliang & Chen, Fei & Wang, Wen & Weng, Min, 2020. "Does the establishment of development zones really improve industrial land use efficiency? Implications for China’s high-quality development policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Marta Bottero & Elena Comino & Federico Dell’Anna & Laura Dominici & Maurizio Rosso, 2019. "Strategic Assessment and Economic Evaluation: The Case Study of Yanzhou Island (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Shiran Zhang & Jiaping Yang & Changdong Ye & Weixuan Chen & Yixuan Li, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Industrial Renovation: Renovation Paths of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Edwin Chan & Grace Lee, 2008. "Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 243-256, January.
    19. Wenwei Huang & Gui Xiong & Lei Zhong & Keqing Li & Hongyang Li & Martin Skitmore & Nima Talebian, 2022. "Research into Satisfaction with Industrial Heritage Renewal Based on the SEM-IPA Model: A Case Study of the Dongguan Jianyuzhou Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Weiliang Chen & Xinjian Huang & Yanhong Liu & Yan Song, 2019. "Does Industry Integration Improve the Competitiveness of China’s Electronic Information Industry?—Evidence from the Integration of the Electronic Information Industry and Financial Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4744-:d:262516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.