IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i11p3215-d238562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flow–Vegetation Interaction in a Living Shoreline Restoration and Potential Effect to Mangrove Recruitment

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly M. Kibler

    (Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering and National Center for Integrated Coastal Research, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

  • Vasileios Kitsikoudis

    (Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

  • Melinda Donnelly

    (Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

  • David W. Spiering

    (Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

  • Linda Walters

    (Department of Biology and National Center for Integrated Coastal Research, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

Abstract

Hydrodynamic differences among shorelines with no vegetation, reference vegetation (mature mangrove), and vegetation planted on restored shoreline (marsh grass and young mangrove) were compared based on field observations 6.5 years after living shoreline restoration. Mean current velocities and waves were more strongly attenuated in vegetation (from channel to shoreline: 80–98% velocity decrease and 35–36% wave height reduction) than in bare shoreline (36–72% velocity decrease, 7% wave height reduction, ANOVA: p < 0.001). Normalized turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rates were significantly higher in reference vegetation (0.16 ± 0.03 m −1 ) than in restored (0.08 ± 0.02 m −1 ) or bare shoreline (0.02 ± 0.01 m −1 , p < 0.001). Significant differences in the current attenuation and turbulence dissipation rates for the reference and planted vegetation are attributed to the observed differences in vegetation array and morphology. Although the hydrodynamic analyses did not suggest limitations to recruitment, mangrove seedlings were not observed in restored vegetation, while four recruited seedlings/m were counted in the reference vegetation. The lack of recruitment in the restored shoreline may suggest a lag in morphological habitat suitability (slope, sediment texture, organic matter content) after restoration. Although hydrodynamics suggest that the restored site should be functionally similar to a reference condition, thresholds in habitat suitability may emerge over longer timescales.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly M. Kibler & Vasileios Kitsikoudis & Melinda Donnelly & David W. Spiering & Linda Walters, 2019. "Flow–Vegetation Interaction in a Living Shoreline Restoration and Potential Effect to Mangrove Recruitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3215-:d:238562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/11/3215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stijn Temmerman & Patrick Meire & Tjeerd J. Bouma & Peter M. J. Herman & Tom Ysebaert & Huib J. De Vriend, 2013. "Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change," Nature, Nature, vol. 504(7478), pages 79-83, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelly M. Kibler & Christian Pilato & Linda J. Walters & Melinda Donnelly & Jyotismita Taye, 2022. "Hydrodynamic Limitations to Mangrove Seedling Retention in Subtropical Estuaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pérez-Maqueo, Octavio & Martínez, M. Luisa & Cóscatl Nahuacatl, Rosendo, 2017. "Is the protection of beach and dune vegetation compatible with tourism?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 175-183.
    2. Reguero, Borja G. & Beck, Michael W. & Schmid, David & Stadtmüller, Daniel & Raepple, Justus & Schüssele, Stefan & Pfliegner, Kerstin, 2020. "Financing coastal resilience by combining nature-based risk reduction with insurance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Álvarez, Xana & Gómez-Rúa, María & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2019. "Risk prevention of land flood: A cooperative game theory approach," MPRA Paper 91515, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Roche, R.C. & Walker-Springett, K. & Robins, P.E. & Jones, J. & Veneruso, G. & Whitton, T.A. & Piano, M. & Ward, S.L. & Duce, C.E. & Waggitt, J.J. & Walker-Springett, G.R. & Neill, S.P. & Lewis, M.J. , 2016. "Research priorities for assessing potential impacts of emerging marine renewable energy technologies: Insights from developments in Wales (UK)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1327-1341.
    5. Takahiro Tsuge & Yasushi Shoji & Koichi Kuriyama & Ayumi Onuma, 2022. "Using a Choice Experiment to Understand Preferences for Disaster Risk Reduction with Uncertainty: A Case Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Carus, Jana & Heuner, Maike & Paul, Maike & Schröder, Boris, 2017. "Which factors and processes drive the spatio-temporal dynamics of brackish marshes?—Insights from development and parameterisation of a mechanistic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 122-136.
    7. Convertino, Matteo & Annis, Antonio & Nardi, Fernando, 2019. "Information-theoretic Portfolio Decision Model for Optimal Flood Management," Earth Arxiv k5aut, Center for Open Science.
    8. Su-Ping Liu & Bin Shi & Kai Gu & Cheng-Cheng Zhang & Ji-Long Yang & Song Zhang & Peng Yang, 2020. "Land subsidence monitoring in sinking coastal areas using distributed fiber optic sensing: a case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3043-3061, September.
    9. Tran, Dung Duc & van Halsema, Gerardo & Hellegers, Petra J.G.J. & Hoang, Long Phi & Ludwig, Fulco, 2019. "Long-term sustainability of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta in question: An economic assessment of water management alternatives," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Wiebe P. de Boer & Jill H. Slinger & Arno K. wa Kangeri & Heleen S.I. Vreugdenhil & Poonam Taneja & Kwasi Appeaning Addo & Tiedo Vellinga, 2019. "Identifying Ecosystem-Based Alternatives for the Design of a Seaport’s Marine Infrastructure: The Case of Tema Port Expansion in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Pengcheng Xiang & Yiming Wang & Qing Deng, 2017. "Inclusive Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Regeneration in a Natural Disaster Vulnerability Context: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Yumei Ding & Hao Wei, 2017. "Modeling the impact of land reclamation on storm surges in Bohai Sea, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(1), pages 559-573, January.
    13. Jantsje Loon-Steensma, 2015. "Salt marshes to adapt the flood defences along the Dutch Wadden Sea coast," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 929-948, August.
    14. Noth, Felix & Rehbein, Oliver, 2019. "Badly hurt? Natural disasters and direct firm effects," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 254-258.
    15. Isaac Dekker & Shabnam Sharifyazd & Evans Batung & Kristian L. Dubrawski, 2021. "Maximizing Benefits to Nature and Society in Techno-Ecological Innovation for Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    16. H. M. Tuihedur Rahman & Kate Sherren & Danika van Proosdij, 2019. "Institutional Innovation for Nature-Based Coastal Adaptation: Lessons from Salt Marsh Restoration in Nova Scotia, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Patricia Moreno-Casasola & Marisa Luisa Martínez & Debora Lithgow, 2021. "New Beach Landscapes to Promote Social Distancing and Coastal Conservation during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Kaihang Zhou & Scott Hawken, 2023. "Climate-Related Sea Level Rise and Coastal Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure Futures: Landscape Planning Scenarios for Negotiating Risks and Opportunities in Australian Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Suhaib A. Bandh & Fayaz A. Malla & Irteza Qayoom & Haika Mohi-Ud-Din & Aqsa Khursheed Butt & Aashia Altaf & Shahid A. Wani & Richard Betts & Thanh Hai Truong & Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham & Dao Nam Cao & Sh, 2023. "Importance of Blue Carbon in Mitigating Climate Change and Plastic/Microplastic Pollution and Promoting Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Tingyu Xu & Xiang Niu & Bing Wang, 2022. "The Grain for Green Project in Contiguous Poverty-Stricken Regions of China: A Nature-Based Solution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:11:p:3215-:d:238562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.