IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2018i1p52-d192405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biofuel Production and Phosphorus Recovery through an Integrated Treatment of Agro-Industrial Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Alessio Siciliano

    (Department of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci cubo 44B, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy)

  • Carlo Limonti

    (Department of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci cubo 44B, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy)

  • Sanjeet Mehariya

    (Department of Sustainability; Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), P. Enrico Fermi 1, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy
    Department of Engineering; University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa (CE), Italy)

  • Antonio Molino

    (Department of Sustainability; Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), P. Enrico Fermi 1, 80055 Portici (NA), Italy)

  • Vincenza Calabrò

    (Department of Informatics, Modelling, Electronics and Systems Engineering, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci cubo 39C, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy)

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop an integrated treatment of agro-industrial waste for biofuel (biogas and syngas) production and for phosphorus recovery. In the first step, an anaerobic digestion (AD) process was carried out on two different mixtures of raw agro-industrial residues. Specifically, a mixture of asparagus and tomato wastes (mixture-1) and a mixture of potatoes and kiwifruit residues (mixture-2) were investigated. The results proved that the properties of mixtures notably affect the evolution of the digestion process. Indeed, despite the lower organic load, the maximum biogas yield, of about 0.44 L/gCOD removed , was obtained for mixture-1. For mixture-2, the digestion process was hindered by the accumulation of acidity due to the lack of alkalinity in respect to the amount of volatile fatty acids. In the second step, the digestates from AD were utilized for syngas production using supercritical water gasification (SCWG) at 450 °C and 250 bar. Both the digestates were rapidly converted into syngas, which was mainly composed of H 2 , CO 2 , CH 4 , and CO. The maximum values of global gasification efficiency, equal to 56.5 g/kgCOD, and gas yield, equal to 1.8 mol/kgTS, were detected for mixture-2. The last step of the integrated treatment aimed to recover the phosphorus content, in the form of MgKPO 4 ˑ6H 2 O, from the residual liquid fraction of SCWG. The experimental results proved that at pH = 10 and Mg/P = 1 it is possible to obtain almost complete phosphorus removal. Moreover, by using the scanning electronic microscopy, it was demonstrated that the produced precipitate was effectively composed of magnesium potassium phosphate crystals.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessio Siciliano & Carlo Limonti & Sanjeet Mehariya & Antonio Molino & Vincenza Calabrò, 2018. "Biofuel Production and Phosphorus Recovery through an Integrated Treatment of Agro-Industrial Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:52-:d:192405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad I. Jahirul & Mohammad G. Rasul & Ashfaque Ahmed Chowdhury & Nanjappa Ashwath, 2012. "Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis —A Technological Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-50, November.
    2. Siciliano, A. & Stillitano, M.A. & De Rosa, S., 2016. "Biogas production from wet olive mill wastes pretreated with hydrogen peroxide in alkaline conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 903-916.
    3. Antonio Molino & Vincenzo Larocca & Simeone Chianese & Dino Musmarra, 2018. "Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Gong, M. & Zhu, W. & Xu, Z.R. & Zhang, H.W. & Yang, H.P., 2014. "Influence of sludge properties on the direct gasification of dewatered sewage sludge in supercritical water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 605-611.
    5. Ankita Juneja & Ruben Michael Ceballos & Ganti S. Murthy, 2013. "Effects of Environmental Factors and Nutrient Availability on the Biochemical Composition of Algae for Biofuels Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-32, September.
    6. Onursal Yakaboylu & John Harinck & K. G. Smit & Wiebren De Jong, 2015. "Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass: A Literature and Technology Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-36, January.
    7. Maurizio Carlini & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Sonia Castellucci & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni, 2017. "An Economical Evaluation of Anaerobic Digestion Plants Fed with Organic Agro-Industrial Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Hynek Roubík & Jana Mazancová & Phung Le Dinh & Dung Dinh Van & Jan Banout, 2018. "Biogas Quality across Small-Scale Biogas Plants: A Case of Central Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Alessio Siciliano & Maria Assuntina Stillitano & Carlo Limonti, 2016. "Energetic Valorization of Wet Olive Mill Wastes through a Suitable Integrated Treatment: H 2 O 2 with Lime and Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanjeet Mehariya & Rahul Kumar Goswami & Pradeep Verma & Roberto Lavecchia & Antonio Zuorro, 2021. "Integrated Approach for Wastewater Treatment and Biofuel Production in Microalgae Biorefineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Antonio Molino & Sanjeet Mehariya & Despina Karatza & Simeone Chianese & Angela Iovine & Patrizia Casella & Tiziana Marino & Dino Musmarra, 2019. "Bench-Scale Cultivation of Microalgae Scenedesmus almeriensis for CO 2 Capture and Lutein Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Rahul Prasad Singh & Priya Yadav & Indrajeet Kumar & Manoj Kumar Solanki & Rajib Roychowdhury & Ajay Kumar & Rajan Kumar Gupta, 2023. "Advancement of Abiotic Stresses for Microalgal Lipid Production and Its Bioprospecting into Sustainable Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-36, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aui, A. & Wang, Y. & Mba-Wright, M., 2021. "Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Liang Meng & Ahmed Alengebawy & Ping Ai & Keda Jin & Mengdi Chen & Yulong Pan, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Modes of Large-Scale Crop Residue Utilization Projects in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Ramin Azargohar & Sonil Nanda & He Cheng & Ajay K. Dalai, 2022. "Potential Application of Canola Hull Fuel Pellets for the Production of Synthesis Gas and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Dudziec, Paweł & Stachowicz, Paweł & Stolarski, Mariusz J., 2023. "Diversity of properties of sawmill residues used as feedstock for energy generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 822-833.
    5. Aboagye, D. & Banadda, N. & Kiggundu, N. & Kabenge, I., 2017. "Assessment of orange peel waste availability in ghana and potential bio-oil yield using fast pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 814-821.
    6. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    7. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan & Azadi, Hossein & Van Passel, Steven & Saber, Zahra & Hosseini-Fashami, Fatemeh & Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh & Ghasemi-Mobtaker, Hassan, 2021. "Prospects of solar systems in production chain of sunflower oil using cold press method with concentrating energy and life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. Mohamed Magdeldin & Thomas Kohl & Cataldo De Blasio & Mika Järvinen & Song Won Park & Reinaldo Giudici, 2016. "The BioSCWG Project: Understanding the Trade-Offs in the Process and Thermal Design of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Andrea Di Giuliano & Stefania Lucantonio & Katia Gallucci, 2021. "Devolatilization of Residual Biomasses for Chemical Looping Gasification in Fluidized Beds Made Up of Oxygen-Carriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Assar, Hossein Alizadeh & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Potential of biofuel production from pistachio waste in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    11. Kumar N, Sasi & Grekov, Denys & Pré, Pascaline & Alappat, Babu J., 2020. "Microwave mode of heating in the preparation of porous carbon materials for adsorption and energy storage applications – An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    12. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Jouhara, H. & Nannou, T.K. & Anguilano, L. & Ghazal, H. & Spencer, N., 2017. "Heat pipe based municipal waste treatment unit for home energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1210-1230.
    14. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    15. Cataldo De Blasio & Gabriel Salierno & Andrea Magnano, 2021. "Implications on Feedstock Processing and Safety Issues for Semi-Batch Operations in Supercritical Water Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Munawar, Muhammad Assad & Khoja, Asif Hussain & Naqvi, Salman Raza & Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Hassan, Muhammad & Liaquat, Rabia & Dawood, Usama Fida, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities in biomass ash management and its utilization in novel applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. M. N. Uddin & Kuaanan Techato & Juntakan Taweekun & Md Mofijur Rahman & M. G. Rasul & T. M. I. Mahlia & S. M. Ashrafur, 2018. "An Overview of Recent Developments in Biomass Pyrolysis Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Ekaterina Ovsyannikova & Andrea Kruse & Gero C. Becker, 2020. "Feedstock-Dependent Phosphate Recovery in a Pilot-Scale Hydrothermal Liquefaction Bio-Crude Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Workson Siwale & Stefan Frodeson & Michael Finell & Mehrdad Arshadi & Carina Jonsson & Gunnar Henriksson & Jonas Berghel, 2022. "Understanding Off-Gassing of Biofuel Wood Pellets Using Pellets Produced from Pure Microcrystalline Cellulose with Different Additive Oils," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    20. Claudinei De Souza Guimarães & David Rodrigues da Silva Maia & Eduardo Gonçalves Serra, 2018. "Construction of Biodigesters to Optimize the Production of Biogas from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Sewage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:52-:d:192405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.