IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2769-d162085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Returns: The Effect of Regional Industrial Development Policy on Institutional Investors’ Behavior in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shu Ling Lin

    (Department of Information and Finance Management, College of Management, National Taipei University of Technology, No.1, Sec. 3, Chung-Hsiao East Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Jun Lu

    (Ph.D. Program in Management, College of Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Jung-Bin Su

    (Department of Finance, China University of Science and Technology, No.245, Academia Road, Sec. 3, Nangang Dist., Taipei 11581, Taiwan)

  • Wei-Peng Chen

    (Department of Information and Finance Management, College of Management, National Taipei University of Technology, No.1, Sec. 3, Chung-Hsiao East Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

Abstract

Within the market economy system controlled by the Chinese government, this study mainly explores whether government policies can sufficiently guide the investment decisions of professional investors. Thus, we examine whether professional investment institutions can support the government’s policy for long-term investment to produce sustainable returns and create value for both the country and investment institutions. To perform this test, we use the annual data from firms held by institutional investors and listed in China A-shares to run a panel regression model. We then explore the following three issues: first, we examined whether firm-level characteristics or regional industrial development policy affect the investment behavior of the institutional investors. Second, we investigated whether four types of institutions have different favorite economic regions in China under the regional industrial development policy. Third, we analyzed which type of institutional investor supports the regional industrial development policy. The above four types of institutions are: independent, grey, domestic, and qualified foreign institutions. Empirical results show that both firm-level characteristics and regional industrial development policy can affect the investment behavior of the institutional owners. Of all the firm-level characteristics selected by institutions in China, return on equity (ROE) is the condition most commonly selected for all types of institutions, whereas the dividend yield (DY) is considered only by qualified foreign institutional investors (QFIIs). Notably, both independent and domestic institutions have the same firm selection criteria. As for the institutions’ favorite industries for investment, only grey institutions prefer the power industry and QFIIs prefer manufacturing industry. In addition, all four types of institutional investors have different industrial favorites in the four economic regions in China under the regional industrial development policy. For example, independent institutions prefer the information industry and grey institutions appear to be interested in every industry. Moreover, domestic institutions prefer the manufacturing and information industries, whereas QFIIs prefer the manufacturing industry. Regarding the regional participation of institutions, both domestic institutions and QFIIs seem to focus on every region. Moreover, independent institutions focus on the eastern and western regions, whereas grey institutions only focus on the western region. Finally, domestic institutions received the greatest level of support, followed by grey and independent institutions, whereas the QFIIs receive the least support. Put simply, domestic institutions are deeply engaged in industrial development all over China, whereas QFIIs are only slightly engaged in this development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu Ling Lin & Jun Lu & Jung-Bin Su & Wei-Peng Chen, 2018. "Sustainable Returns: The Effect of Regional Industrial Development Policy on Institutional Investors’ Behavior in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2769-:d:162085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2769/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2769/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. Gompers & Andrew Metrick, 2001. "Institutional Investors and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 229-259.
    2. Stock, James H & Wright, Jonathan H & Yogo, Motohiro, 2002. "A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(4), pages 518-529, October.
    3. Parrino, Robert & Sias, Richard W. & Starks, Laura T., 2003. "Voting with their feet: institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 3-46, April.
    4. María Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Luis Miralles-Quirós & Luis Miguel Valente Gonçalves, 2018. "The Value Relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Brazilian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Renneboog, Luc & Ter Horst, Jenke & Zhang, Chendi, 2008. "Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1723-1742, September.
    6. Ningyue Liu & Don Bredin & Liming Wang & Zhihong Yi, 2014. "Domestic and foreign institutional investors' behavior in China," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7-9), pages 728-751, September.
    7. Tristan Kenderdine, 2017. "China's Industrial Policy, Strategic Emerging Industries and Space Law," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 201724, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    8. Bohl, Martin T. & Brzeszczynski, Janusz, 2006. "Do institutional investors destabilize stock prices? evidence from an emerging market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 370-383, October.
    9. Robert Bricker & Garen Markarian, 2015. "Institutional Investors and Insider Trading Profitability," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 495-518, September.
    10. Barry Naughton, 2007. "The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262640643, December.
    11. Rubin, Amir & Smith, Daniel R., 2009. "Institutional ownership, volatility and dividends," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 627-639, April.
    12. Clarke, Donald C., 2003. "Corporate governance in China: An overview," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 494-507.
    13. Aggarwal, Reena & Erel, Isil & Ferreira, Miguel & Matos, Pedro, 2011. "Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 154-181, April.
    14. Anderson, T. W. & Hsiao, Cheng, 1982. "Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 47-82, January.
    15. Aki Kangasharju, 2000. "Regional variations in firm formation: Panel and cross-section data evidence from Finland," Papers in Regional Science, Springer;Regional Science Association International, vol. 79(4), pages 355-373.
    16. Brickley, James A. & Lease, Ronald C. & Smith, Clifford Jr., 1988. "Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 267-291, January.
    17. Chen, Zhian & Du, Jinmin & Li, Donghui & Ouyang, Rui, 2013. "Does foreign institutional ownership increase return volatility? Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 660-669.
    18. Fergusson, Michael J. & McGuinness, Paul B., 2004. "Chinese securities reform: The role of QFII in the corporate governance process," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 53-61.
    19. Kang, Jun-Koo & Stulz, Rene M., 1997. "Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 3-28, October.
    20. Tristan Kenderdine, 2017. "China's Industrial Policy, Strategic Emerging Industries and Space Law," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 325-342, May.
    21. Justyna Przychodzen & Fernando Gómez-Bezares & Wojciech Przychodzen & Mikel Larreina, 2016. "ESG Issues among Fund Managers—Factors and Motives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    22. Falkenstein, Eric G, 1996. "Preferences for Stock Characteristics as Revealed by Mutual Fund Portfolio Holdings," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 111-135, March.
    23. Sasan Mehrani & Mohammad Moradi & Hoda Eskandar, 2017. "Institutional Ownership Type and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Iran," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 54-73, January.
    24. Steve Lydenberg, 2014. "Reason, Rationality, and Fiduciary Duty," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 365-380, February.
    25. Ferreira, Miguel A. & Matos, Pedro, 2008. "The colors of investors' money: The role of institutional investors around the world," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 499-533, June.
    26. Hideaki Miyajima & Takaaki Hoda, 2015. "Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance: Has an Increase in Institutional Investors f Ownership Improved Business Performance?," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 11(3), pages 361-394, July.
    27. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    28. Yensen Ni & Yulu Liao & Paoyu Huang, 2017. "Foreign Institutional Investors, Shareholding Change, and Corporate Governance," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 764-775, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu-Ling Lin & Jun Lu, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Corporate Performance: Insights from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Jung-Bin Su, 2020. "The Implementation of Asset Allocation Approaches: Theory and Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Lixia Jin & Changjian Wang & Hongou Zhang & Yuyao Ye & Zhiwei Du & Yuling Zhang, 2019. "Evolution and Mechanism of the “Core–Periphery” Relationship: Micro-Evidence from Cross-Regional Industrial Production Organization in a Fast-Developing Region in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Shu-Ling Lin & Jun Lu, 2020. "Did Institutional Investors’ Behavior Affect U.S.-China Equity Market Sentiment? Evidence from the U.S.-China Trade Turbulence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Yujue Wang, 2022. "Compacter networks as a defensive mechanism: How firms clustered during 2015 Financial Crisis in China," Papers 2212.01557, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shu-Ling Lin & Jun Lu, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Corporate Performance: Insights from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Roberto Álvarez & Mauricio Jara-Bertín & Carlos Pombo, 2016. "Do institutional investors unbind firm financial constraints? Evidence from emerging markets," Documentos CEDE 15114, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    3. Guha Deb, Soumya, 2018. "Institutional Investors and firm characteristics: New evidence from India," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 30-42.
    4. Nguyen, Nghia Huu & Shiu, Cheng-Yi, 2022. "Stewardship, institutional investors monitoring, and firm value: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Mishra, Anil V., 2013. "Foreign ownership in Australian firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-18.
    6. Liu, Ningyue & Bredin, Don & Cao, Huijuan, 2020. "The investment behavior of Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors in China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    7. Kim, Incheol & Miller, Steve & Wan, Hong & Wang, Bin, 2016. "Drivers behind the monitoring effectiveness of global institutional investors: Evidence from earnings management," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 24-46.
    8. Abdioglu, Nida & Khurshed, Arif & Stathopoulos, Konstantinos, 2013. "Foreign institutional investment: Is governance quality at home important?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 916-940.
    9. Huang, Wei & Zhu, Tao, 2015. "Foreign institutional investors and corporate governance in emerging markets: Evidence of a split-share structure reform in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 312-326.
    10. Mishra, Anil V. & Ratti, Ronald A., 2011. "Governance, monitoring and foreign investment in Chinese companies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 171-188, June.
    11. Maria Gaia Soana & Laura Barbieri & Andrea Lippi & Simone Rossi, 2021. "The Effect of Multiple Large Shareholders on Banks’ Profitability and Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Drobetz, Wolfgang & Ehlert, Sebastian & Schröder, Henning, 2021. "Institutional ownership and firm performance in the global shipping industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    13. Zou, Liping & Tang, Tiantian & Li, Xiaoming, 2016. "The stock preferences of domestic versus foreign investors: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (QFIIs) in China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 37, pages 12-28.
    14. He, Lerong & Huang, Liying & Fang, Liting, 2022. "Institutional conditions, economic policy uncertainty and foreign institutional investment in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    15. Bajo, Emanuele & Barbi, Massimiliano & Bigelli, Marco & Hillier, David, 2013. "The role of institutional investors in public-to-private transactions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4327-4336.
    16. Takanori Tanaka, 2015. "Foreign investors and corporate social responsibility: evidence from the career advancement of women in Japan," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(33), pages 3510-3524, July.
    17. Belghitar, Yacine & Clark, Ephraim & Kassimatis, Konstantino, 2011. "The prudential effect of strategic institutional ownership on stock performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 191-199, August.
    18. Anil Mishra, 2014. "Foreign Ownership and Firm Value: Evidence from Australian Firms," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 21(1), pages 67-96, March.
    19. Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2015. "Foreign ownership and stock return volatility – Evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 101-109.
    20. Aggarwal, Reena & Erel, Isil & Ferreira, Miguel & Matos, Pedro, 2011. "Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 154-181, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2769-:d:162085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.