IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p1708-d148658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Affect the performance of megaprojects? Insights from a System Dynamic Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Wang

    (Research Institute of Complex Engineering & Management, School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Qinghua He

    (Research Institute of Complex Engineering & Management, School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yujie Lu

    (Department of Building, School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117566, Singapore)

  • Delei Yang

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450000, China)

Abstract

As one of the emerging research fields of sustainability management, Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), especially its influence on project performance, has been drawing increased attention both in the academic and industrial areas. Nevertheless, existing studies mainly examine the static relationship between OCB and project performance but fail to explore the dynamic characteristic of the relationship as a project may evolve and proceed over the time. Therefore, this paper aims to evaluate the dynamic impacts of OCB on the performance of megaprojects with the assistance of a system dynamic model. Four causal feedback loops and a stock-flow diagram were developed to illustrate the dynamic influencing mechanism, and three distinct policies quantitatively simulated the possible impacts arising from the changes of OCB on the whole system and, specifically, on the performance megaproject. The results show that an increase in the AIRPP (actual increasing rate of potential promotion) exerts significant influence on the improvement in OCB and the performance of megaprojects. The higher the AIRPP in the multi-policy scenario, the higher the OCB and the performance. One major contribution is that this study is one of the first studies to explore the potential use of system dynamics to model megaproject organizational behavior and its performance with implications in both the practical and cultural promotion of OCB.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Wang & Qinghua He & Yujie Lu & Delei Yang, 2018. "How Does Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Affect the performance of megaprojects? Insights from a System Dynamic Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1708-:d:148658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1708/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1708/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan & Seong, Baek Seo, 2010. "How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2216-2224, May.
    2. Yuan, Hongping & Wang, Jiayuan, 2014. "A system dynamics model for determining the waste disposal charging fee in construction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 988-996.
    3. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2014. "What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview," Papers 1409.0003, arXiv.org.
    4. Jiing-Lih Farh & Chen-Bo Zhong & Dennis W. Organ, 2004. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the People's Republic of China," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 241-253, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Na Zhao & Congcong Lei & Hui Liu & Chunlin Wu, 2022. "Improving the Effectiveness of Organisational Collaborative Innovation in Megaprojects: An Agent-Based Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Sung-Hoon Ko & Yongjun Choi & Seung-Yoon Rhee & Tae Won Moon, 2018. "Social Capital and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Double-Mediation of Emotional Regulation and Job Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Ting Wang & Emmanuel Kingsford Owusu & Qinghua He & Zidan Tian & Dong Wu, 2022. "Empirical Assessments of the Determinants of Construction Megaprojects’ Success: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Marko M. Mihić & Zorica A. Dodevska & Marija Lj. Todorović & Vladimir Lj. Obradović & Dejan Č. Petrović, 2018. "Reducing Risks in Energy Innovation Projects: Complexity Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Hongtao Xie & Junwei Zheng & Yunhua Zhang & Hongyang Li, 2019. "Effects of Payment Delays at Two Links in Payment Chains on the Progress of Construction Projects: System Dynamic Modeling and Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Humayun Sattar & Tasweer Hussain Syed & Afshan Naseem & Yasir Ahmad & Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza & Masood Raza, 2021. "Uncovering the Indirect Impact of Work Ethic on Engineering Students’ Productivity through Positive and Negative Organizational Behaviors and Workaholism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lai Sheung Au & Seungjun Ahn & Tae Wan Kim, 2018. "System Dynamic Analysis of Impacts of Government Charges on Disposal of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Hong Kong Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Parvin Berenjkar & Yu Yan Li & Qiuyan Yuan, 2021. "The application of system dynamics in different practices of a waste management system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 15695-15724, November.
    3. An-Chih Wang & Jack Ting-Ju Chiang & Wan-Ju Chou & Bor-Shiuan Cheng, 2017. "One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 505-535, September.
    4. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Diane Coyle & Marianne Sensier, 2020. "The imperial treasury: appraisal methodology and regional economic performance in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 283-295, March.
    6. Dehghan, Hamed & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Nahavandi, Nasim, 2021. "A system dynamics model to analyze future electricity supply and demand in Iran under alternative pricing policies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Xiaowei Yang & Shumin Yan & Jiang He & Junjie Dong, 2022. "Review and Prospects of Enterprise Human Resource Management Effectiveness: Bibliometric Analysis Based on Chinese-Language and English-Language Journals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Alexander Budzier & Bent Flyvbjerg & Andi Garavaglia & Andreas Leed, 2019. "Quantitative Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis of Nuclear Waste Storage," Papers 1901.11123, arXiv.org.
    10. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-ming, 2012. "Prediction of China's coal production-environmental pollution based on a hybrid genetic algorithm-system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 521-529.
    12. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic D., 2019. "On de-bunking ‘fake news’ in a post truth era: Why does the Planning Fallacy explanation for cost overruns fall short?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 397-408.
    13. Love, Peter E.D. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic & Welde, Morten & Odeck, James, 2017. "Light rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-39.
    14. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier, 2018. "Report for the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry," Papers 1805.12106, arXiv.org.
    15. Karen Lucas & Ian Philips & Ersilia Verlinghieri, 2022. "A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 271-291, February.
    16. Yinhe Bu & Xingping Zhang, 2021. "On the Way to Integrate Increasing Shares of Variable Renewables in China: Experience from Flexibility Modification and Deep Peak Regulation Ancillary Service Market Based on MILP-UC Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Shutian Zhou & Guofang Zhai & Yijun Shi, 2018. "What Drives the Rise of Metro Developments in China? Evidence from Nantong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    18. James D. A. Millington & Hang Xiong & Steve Peterson & Jeremy Woods, 2017. "Integrating Modelling Approaches for Understanding Telecoupling: Global Food Trade and Local Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Jingru Li & Jinxiao Ji & Jian Zuo & Yi Tan, 2023. "Is Policy the Necessary or Sufficient Driving Force of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry Development? Experience from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Torres, Juan Pablo & Barrera, Jose Ignacio & Kunc, Martin & Charters, Steve, 2021. "The dynamics of wine tourism adoption in Chile," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 474-485.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1708-:d:148658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.