IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p705-d134802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Duopoly Manufacturers’ Game Model Considering Green Technology Investment under a Cap-and-Trade System

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Zheng

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Gaoxun Zhang

    (School of Science, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China)

  • Weiwei Zhang

    (School of Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

Abstract

This research studied the duopoly manufacturers’ decision-making considering green technology investment and under a cap-and-trade system. It was assumed there were two manufacturers producing products which were substitutable for one another. On the basis of this assumption, the optimal production capacity, price, and green technology investment of the duopoly manufacturers under a cap-and-trade system were obtained. The increase or decrease of the optimal production quantity of the duopoly manufacturers under a cap-and-trade system was decided by their green technology level. The increase of the optimal price as well as the increase or decrease of the maximum expected profits were decided by the initial carbon emission quota granted by the government. Our research indicates that the carbon emission of unit product is inversely proportional to the market share of an enterprise and becomes an important index to measure the core competitiveness of an enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Zheng & Gaoxun Zhang & Weiwei Zhang, 2018. "A Duopoly Manufacturers’ Game Model Considering Green Technology Investment under a Cap-and-Trade System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:705-:d:134802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/705/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/705/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Shouyang, 2011. "Managing carbon footprints in inventory management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 178-185, August.
    2. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.
    3. Zhang, Rong & Liu, Bin & Wang, Wenliang, 2012. "Pricing decisions in a dual channels system with different power structures," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 523-533.
    4. S. Chan Choi, 1991. "Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 271-296.
    5. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 141-168.
    6. Wu, Cheng-Han & Chen, Chieh-Wan & Hsieh, Chung-Chi, 2012. "Competitive pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain with horizontal and vertical competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 265-274.
    7. Du, Shaofu & Zhu, Lili & Liang, Liang & Ma, Fang, 2013. "Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 61-67.
    8. Jingpu Song & Mingming Leng, 2012. "Analysis of the Single-Period Problem under Carbon Emissions Policies," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Tsan-Ming Choi (ed.), Handbook of Newsvendor Problems, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 297-313, Springer.
    9. Kut C. So, 2000. "Price and Time Competition for Service Delivery," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 392-409, April.
    10. Wahab, M.I.M. & Mamun, S.M.H. & Ongkunaruk, P., 2011. "EOQ models for a coordinated two-level international supply chain considering imperfect items and environmental impact," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 151-158, November.
    11. Zhang, Bin & Xu, Liang, 2013. "Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 118-127.
    12. Vachon, Stephan & Klassen, Robert D., 2008. "Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 299-315, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Liu & Zhe Wang & Zhao Song & Zaisheng Zhang, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis on behavioral strategies of four participants in green technology innovation system," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 960-977, March.
    2. Ziyue Wang & Juan Zhang & Huiju Zhao, 2020. "The Selection of Green Technology Innovations under Dual-Credit Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Zongxian Wang & Xiao Li & Weihua Liang & Junhai Ma, 2023. "Does a New Electric Vehicle Manufacturer Have the Incentive for Battery Life Investment? A Study Based on the Game Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    2. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    3. Schaefer, Brian & Konur, Dinçer, 2015. "Economic and environmental considerations in a continuous review inventory control system with integrated transportation decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 142-165.
    4. Yao-Yu Wang & Jiasen Sun & Jian-Cai Wang, 2016. "Equilibrium markup pricing strategies for the dominant retailers under supply chain to chain competition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2075-2092, April.
    5. Yi Zheng & Huchang Liao & Xue Yang, 2016. "Stochastic Pricing and Order Model with Transportation Mode Selection for Low-Carbon Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Gao Xiang Lou & Hai Yang Xia & Jie Qiong Zhang & Ti Jun Fan, 2015. "Investment Strategy of Emission-Reduction Technology in a Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Chen, Jing & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 437-451.
    8. Chirantan Mondal & Bibhas C. Giri, 2022. "Retailers’ competition and cooperation in a closed-loop green supply chain under governmental intervention and cap-and-trade policy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 859-894, April.
    9. Ping He & Guowei Dou & Wei Zhang, 2017. "Optimal production planning and cap setting under cap-and-trade regulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(9), pages 1094-1105, September.
    10. Hara, Reiya & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2017. "Premium store brand: Product development collaboration between retailers and national brand manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 128-138.
    11. Yonghong Cheng & Zhongkai Xiong & Qinglin Luo, 2018. "Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Xu, Xiaoping & Zhang, Wei & He, Ping & Xu, Xiaoyan, 2017. "Production and pricing problems in make-to-order supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 248-257.
    13. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing, 2018. "Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 97-108.
    14. Ji, Jingna & Zhang, Zhiyong & Yang, Lei, 2017. "Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 68-84.
    15. Hong, Zhaofu & Chu, Chengbin & Yu, Yugang, 2016. "Dual-mode production planning for manufacturing with emission constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 96-106.
    16. Shih-Pin Chen, 2017. "Effects of fuzzy data on decision making in a competitive supply chain," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1146-1160, October.
    17. García-Alvarado, M.S. & Paquet, M. & Chaabane, A., 2015. "On inventory control of product recovery systems subject to environmental mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 132-144.
    18. Shaojian Qu & Guoqing Jiang & Ying Ji & Guangming Zhang & Nabe Mohamed, 2021. "Newsvendor’s optimal decisions under stochastic demand and cap-and-trade regulation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17764-17787, December.
    19. YuJan Shen & KuanFu Shen & ChihTe Yang, 2019. "A Production Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items with Collaborative Preservation Technology Investment Under Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Ayşegül Toptal & Bilgesu Çetinkaya, 2017. "How supply chain coordination affects the environment: a carbon footprint perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 487-519, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:705-:d:134802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.