IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p691-d134634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurship Education: An Experimental Study with Information and Communication Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Yenchun Jim Wu

    (Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 10645, Taiwan
    College of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei 10671, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Hung Yuan

    (Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 10645, Taiwan)

  • Chia-I Pan

    (Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan)

Abstract

Entrepreneurship has been regarded as a new science in the promotion of economic development, which has led to rapid development in entrepreneurship education. The growing number of students enrolled in entrepreneurship programs creates unprecedented challenges on educators. Although multiple teaching and learning activities are adopted in entrepreneurship education, these are mainly carried out using traditional classroom lectures, case studies and group discussions. Nowadays, information & communication technology (ICT) is used to enhance the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods and competency training. PowToon is a web-based ICT tool that hat allows teachers and students to quickly and easily create animated presentations. Using quasi-experimental design and qualitative method, this study is to examine whether PowToon is an effective tool for business plan presentation. The study find that the animated presentations attracted more investment than the groups that did not prepare animated videos. It reflects that developed videos which helps entrepreneurial team to better deliver their business ideas to investors in a well-thought out way. In addition, the results of the study show that individuals who generate a business idea did not necessarily significantly influence their investment decisions. Our findings challenge the concept on self-biases evaluations of the economic potential of their own business ideas. Finally, the students were very willing to adopt new ways of delivering their business ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yenchun Jim Wu & Chih-Hung Yuan & Chia-I Pan, 2018. "Entrepreneurship Education: An Experimental Study with Information and Communication Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:691-:d:134634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/691/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/691/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irfan Hameed & Muhammad Babar Khan & Atif Shahab & Imran Hameed & Faisal Qadeer, 2016. "Science, Technology and Innovation through Entrepreneurship Education in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Mara Wijnker & Han Van Kasteren & Henny Romijn, 2015. "Fostering Sustainable Energy Entrepreneurship among Students: The Business Oriented Technological System Analysis (BOTSA) Program at Eindhoven University of Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Colin Clark, 2008. "The impact of entrepreneurs' oral ‘pitch’ presentation skills on business angels' initial screening investment decisions," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 257-279, April.
    4. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    5. Hameed, Irfan & Babar Khan, Muhammad & Shahab, Atif & Hameed, Imran & Qadeer, Faisal, 2016. "Science, Technology and Innovation through Entrepreneurship Education in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)," MPRA Paper 91772, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Donald F. Kuratko, 2005. "The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends, and Challenges," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(5), pages 577-597, September.
    7. Marian Buil & Juan Pedro Aznar & Jorge Galiana & Alba Rocafort-Marco, 2016. "An Explanatory Study of MBA Students with Regards to Sustainability and Ethics Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Garry Bruton & Susanna Khavul & Donald Siegel & Mike Wright, 2015. "New Financial Alternatives in Seeding Entrepreneurship: Microfinance, Crowdfunding, and Peer–to–Peer Innovations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(1), pages 9-26, January.
    9. Mateos Romero, Lucía & Murillo Huertas, Inés P. & Salinas Jiménez, Mª del Mar, 2017. "Wage effects of cognitive skills and educational mismatch in Europe," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 909-927.
    10. Soheil Hooshangi & George Loewenstein, 2018. "The Impact of Idea Generation and Potential Appropriation on Entrepreneurship: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 64-82, January.
    11. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Vijay Raghavan & Ernesto Damiani, 2017. "Big Data and Data Analytics Research: From Metaphors to Value Space for Collective Wisdom in Human Decision Making and Smart Machines," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Alberto Martínez-González & Carmen Dolores Álvarez-Albelo & Javier Mendoza-Jiménez & Urszula Kobylinska, 2022. "Predicting the Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Starting Up a New Company: A Regional Study Using PLS-SEM and Data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Alecxandrina Deaconu & Elena Mădălina Dedu & Ramona Ștefania Igreț & Cătălina Radu, 2018. "The Use of Information and Communications Technology in Vocational Education and Training—Premise of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Guangji Tong & Zhiwei Yin, 2022. "Adaptive Trading System of Assets for International Cooperation in Agricultural Finance Based on Neural Network," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1557-1576, April.
    4. Chih-Hung Yuan & Dajiang Wang & Chuanyu Mao & Feixia Wu, 2020. "An Empirical Comparison of Graduate Entrepreneurs and Graduate Employees Based on Graduate Entrepreneurship Education and Career Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Taofeng Liu & Dominika Wilczyńska & Mariusz Lipowski & Zijian Zhao, 2021. "Optimization of a Sports Activity Development Model Using Artificial Intelligence under New Curriculum Reform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Nurin Asyikin Ahmad & Mohamad Sattar Rasul & Norasmah Othman & Nur Atiqah Jalaludin, 2022. "Generating Entrepreneurial Ideas for Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Liwen Chen & Tung-Liang Chen & Chieh-Ju Lin & Hsu-Kuan (Jonathan) Liu, 2018. "Preschool Teachers’ Perception of the Application of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Antonio Bernal-Guerrero & Antonio Ramón Cárdenas-Gutiérrez & Elisabet Montoro-Fernández, 2020. "Basic business knowledge scale for secondary education students. Development and validation with Spanish teenagers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Foteini Grivokostopoulou & Konstantinos Kovas & Isidoros Perikos, 2019. "Examining the Impact of a Gamified Entrepreneurship Education Framework in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jialiang & Li, Yaokuang & Calic, Goran & Shevchenko, Anton, 2020. "How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 6-18.
    2. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    3. Berns, John P. & Jia, Yankun & Gondo, Maria, 2022. "Crowdfunding success in sustainability-oriented projects: An exploratory examination of the crowdfunding of 3D printers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Appio, Francesco Paolo & Leone, Daniele & Platania, Federico & Schiavone, Francesco, 2020. "Why are rewards not delivered on time in rewards-based crowdfunding campaigns? An empirical exploration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Biljana Ratković Njegovan & Maja Vukadinović & Iva Šiđanin & Sonja Bunčić & Milica Njegovan, 2022. "Optimistic Belief in One’s Own Capableness as a Factor of Entrepreneurial Sustainability: The Assessments of Self-Efficacy from the Perspective of Serbian Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Chan, C.S. Richard & Parhankangas, Annaleena & Sahaym, Arvin & Oo, Pyayt, 2020. "Bellwether and the herd? Unpacking the u-shaped relationship between prior funding and subsequent contributions in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    7. Johannes Wallmeroth & Peter Wirtz & Alexander Peter Groh, 2017. "Institutional Seed Financing, Angel Financing, and Crowdfunding of Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Literature Review," Working Papers hal-01527999, HAL.
    8. Allison, Thomas H. & Davis, Blakley C. & Webb, Justin W. & Short, Jeremy C., 2017. "Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 707-725.
    9. Zunino, Diego & van Praag, Mirjam C. & Dushnitsky, Gary, 2017. "Badge of Honor or Scarlet Letter? Unpacking Investors' Judgment of Entrepreneurs' Past Failure," IZA Discussion Papers 11017, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Etienne Schraven & Elco van Burg & Marco van Gelderen & Enno Masurel, 2020. "Predictions of Crowdfunding Campaign Success: The Influence of First Impressions on Accuracy and Positivity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Hadar Gafni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs Périlleux, 2021. "Business or Basic Needs? The Impact of Loan Purpose on Social Crowdfunding Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 777-793, November.
    12. Matthew Josefy & Thomas J. Dean & Lumina S. Albert & Markus A. Fitza, 2017. "The Role of Community in Crowdfunding Success: Evidence on Cultural Attributes in Funding Campaigns to “Save the Local Theaterâ€," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(2), pages 161-182, March.
    13. Saul Estrin & Susanna Khavul & Mike Wright, 2022. "Soft and hard information in equity crowdfunding: network effects in the digitalization of entrepreneurial finance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1761-1781, April.
    14. Estrin, Saul & Gozman, Daniel & Khavul, Susanna, 2017. "Equity crowdfunding and early stage entrepreneurial finance: damaging or disruptive?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86590, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Alexander C. Lewis & Arkangel M. Cordero & Rachael Xiong, 2021. "Too Red for Crowdfunding: The Legitimation and Adoption of Crowdfunding Across Political Cultures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(3), pages 471-504, May.
    16. Friedemann Polzin & Helen Toxopeus & Erik Stam, 2018. "The wisdom of the crowd in funding: information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 251-273, February.
    17. Mahmood, Ammara & Luffarelli, Jonathan & Mukesh, Mudra, 2019. "What's in a logo? The impact of complex visual cues in equity crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 41-62.
    18. Bergmann, Ariel & Burton, Bruce & Klaes, Matthias, 2021. "European perceptions on crowdfunding for renewables: Positivity and pragmatism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    19. Chien-Chi Chu & Ya-Fang Cheng & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Kun-Hwa Lu, 2019. "Open Innovation in Crowdfunding Context: Diversity, Knowledge, and Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    20. Sardar Muhammad Usman & Farasat Ali Shah Bukhari & Muhammad Usman & Daniel Badulescu & Muhammad Safdar Sial, 2019. "Does the Role of Media and Founder’s Past Success Mitigate the Problem of Information Asymmetry? Evidence from a UK Crowdfunding Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:691-:d:134634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.