IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3696-d175727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation-Based Decision Support Tools in the Early Design Stages of a Green Building—A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Han

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Qiong Huang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Anxiao Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Qi Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

Early simulation work in the decision-making stage faces several challenges, including, for example, rapid changes of design, input variable uncertainties, and the lack of design information, although early design work represents a large percentage of energy saving potential. The availability of simulation tools for early design stages can help the architect analyze more alternatives. In this study, the existing simulation tools were explored and classified into three categories: simulation plugins based on the design software, geometry user interfaces for a simulation engine, and self-governing simulation tools. Each category’s typical tools were illustrated with their use, and a uniform standard comparison was conducted to screen tools that are available in the early design stages. The future trends of simulation tools are discussed in the second part: building databases based on existing knowledge, uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, and optimization. Time-consuming simulation is a problem in the use of simulation tools in early design stages. Advanced techniques were developed in this part for fast computing, i.e., cloud computing, parallel computing, meta-models, and more statistical methods. This paper illustrates the practical application of particular simulation tools in the early design stage, presents their limitations, and discusses decision-support tools for specific building design activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Han & Qiong Huang & Anxiao Zhang & Qi Zhang, 2018. "Simulation-Based Decision Support Tools in the Early Design Stages of a Green Building—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3696-:d:175727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Méndez Echenagucia, Tomás & Capozzoli, Alfonso & Cascone, Ylenia & Sassone, Mario, 2015. "The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 577-591.
    2. Geyer, Philipp & Schlüter, Arno, 2014. "Automated metamodel generation for Design Space Exploration and decision-making – A novel method supporting performance-oriented building design and retrofitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 537-556.
    3. Heiselberg, Per & Brohus, Henrik & Hesselholt, Allan & Rasmussen, Henrik & Seinre, Erkki & Thomas, Sara, 2009. "Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 2030-2036.
    4. Bustamante, Waldo & Uribe, Daniel & Vera, Sergio & Molina, Germán, 2017. "An integrated thermal and lighting simulation tool to support the design process of complex fenestration systems for office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 36-48.
    5. Østergård, Torben & Jensen, Rasmus L. & Maagaard, Steffen E., 2016. "Building simulations supporting decision making in early design – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 187-201.
    6. Petersen, Steffen & Svendsen, Svend, 2011. "Method for simulating predictive control of building systems operation in the early stages of building design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4597-4606.
    7. Tian, Wei, 2013. "A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 411-419.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghada Elshafei & Dušan Katunský & Martina Zeleňáková & Abdelazim Negm, 2022. "Opportunities for Using Analytical Hierarchy Process in Green Building Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Zhou, Kai & Leng, Jia-Wei, 2023. "State-of-the-art research of performance-driven architectural design for low-carbon urban underground space: Systematic review and proposed design strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Mohamed H. Elnabawi, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of Energy Efficiency Building Codes for Residential Buildings in the GCC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Wahhaj Ahmed & Muhammad Asif & Farajallah Alrashed, 2019. "Application of Building Performance Simulation to Design Energy-Efficient Homes: Case Study from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Marcus Sandberg & Jani Mukkavaara & Farshid Shadram & Thomas Olofsson, 2019. "Multidisciplinary Optimization of Life-Cycle Energy and Cost Using a BIM-Based Master Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Kurdi, Yumna & Alkhatatbeh, Baraa J. & Asadi, Somayeh & Jebelli, Houtan, 2022. "A decision-making design framework for the integration of PV systems in the urban energy planning process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 288-304.
    7. Ramy Mahmoud & John M. Kamara & Neil Burford, 2020. "Opportunities and Limitations of Building Energy Performance Simulation Tools in the Early Stages of Building Design in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    8. Razmi, Afshin & Rahbar, Morteza & Bemanian, Mohammadreza, 2022. "PCA-ANN integrated NSGA-III framework for dormitory building design optimization: Energy efficiency, daylight, and thermal comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Singh, Manav Mahan & Singaravel, Sundaravelpandian & Geyer, Philipp, 2021. "Machine learning for early stage building energy prediction: Increment and enrichment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    10. Younghun Choi & Takuro Kobashi & Yoshiki Yamagata & Akito Murayama, 2021. "Assessment of waterfront office redevelopment plan on optimal building energy demand and rooftop photovoltaics for urban decarbonization," Papers 2108.09029, arXiv.org.
    11. Shaoxiong Li & Le Liu & Changhai Peng, 2020. "A Review of Performance-Oriented Architectural Design and Optimization in the Context of Sustainability: Dividends and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-36, February.
    12. Ghada Elshafei & Silvia Vilcekova & Martina Zelenakova & Abdelazim M. Negm, 2021. "Towards an Adaptation of Efficient Passive Design for Thermal Comfort Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Nutkiewicz, Alex & Mastrucci, Alessio & Rao, Narasimha D. & Jain, Rishee K., 2022. "Cool roofs can mitigate cooling energy demand for informal settlement dwellers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdo Abdullah Ahmed Gassar & Choongwan Koo & Tae Wan Kim & Seung Hyun Cha, 2021. "Performance Optimization Studies on Heating, Cooling and Lighting Energy Systems of Buildings during the Design Stage: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-47, September.
    2. Jusselme, Thomas & Rey, Emmanuel & Andersen, Marilyne, 2018. "An integrative approach for embodied energy: Towards an LCA-based data-driven design method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 123-132.
    3. Ciardiello, Adriana & Rosso, Federica & Dell'Olmo, Jacopo & Ciancio, Virgilio & Ferrero, Marco & Salata, Ferdinando, 2020. "Multi-objective approach to the optimization of shape and envelope in building energy design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Waqas Ahmed Mahar & Griet Verbeeck & Sigrid Reiter & Shady Attia, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis of Passive Design Strategies for Residential Buildings in Cold Semi-Arid Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Østergård, Torben & Jensen, Rasmus L. & Maagaard, Steffen E., 2016. "Building simulations supporting decision making in early design – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 187-201.
    6. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    7. Taveres-Cachat, Ellika & Lobaccaro, Gabriele & Goia, Francesco & Chaudhary, Gaurav, 2019. "A methodology to improve the performance of PV integrated shading devices using multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 731-744.
    8. Østergård, Torben & Jensen, Rasmus Lund & Maagaard, Steffen Enersen, 2018. "A comparison of six metamodeling techniques applied to building performance simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 89-103.
    9. Singh, Manav Mahan & Singaravel, Sundaravelpandian & Geyer, Philipp, 2021. "Machine learning for early stage building energy prediction: Increment and enrichment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    10. Lu, Yuehong & Wang, Shengwei & Yan, Chengchu & Shan, Kui, 2015. "Impacts of renewable energy system design inputs on the performance robustness of net zero energy buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1595-1606.
    11. Roberto Robledo-Fava & Mónica C. Hernández-Luna & Pedro Fernández-de-Córdoba & Humberto Michinel & Sonia Zaragoza & A Castillo-Guzman & Romeo Selvas-Aguilar, 2019. "Analysis of the Influence Subjective Human Parameters in the Calculation of Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption of Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Ramos Ruiz, Germán & Fernández Bandera, Carlos & Gómez-Acebo Temes, Tomás & Sánchez-Ostiz Gutierrez, Ana, 2016. "Genetic algorithm for building envelope calibration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 691-705.
    13. Eduardo Vázquez-López & Federico Garzia & Roberta Pernetti & Jaime Solís-Guzmán & Madelyn Marrero, 2020. "Assessment Model of End-of-Life Costs and Waste Quantification in Selective Demolitions: Case Studies of Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Gao, Hao & Koch, Christian & Wu, Yupeng, 2019. "Building information modelling based building energy modelling: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 320-343.
    15. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 37-68.
    16. Ma, Zhenjun & Xia, Lei & Gong, Xuemei & Kokogiannakis, Georgios & Wang, Shugang & Zhou, Xinlei, 2020. "Recent advances and development in optimal design and control of ground source heat pump systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Sean Hay Kim & Jungmin Nam, 2020. "Can Both the Economic Value and Energy Performance of Small- and Mid-Sized Buildings Be Satisfied? Development of a Design Expert System in the Context of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-29, June.
    18. Shilei Lu & Zichen Wang & Tianshuai Zhang, 2020. "Quantitative Analysis and Multi-Index Evaluation of the Green Building Envelope Performance in the Cold Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, January.
    19. Singh, Ramkishore & Lazarus, I.J. & Kishore, V.V.N., 2016. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of energy and visual performances of office building with external venetian blind shading in hot-dry climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 155-170.
    20. Zuo, Jian & Pullen, Stephen & Rameezdeen, Raufdeen & Bennetts, Helen & Wang, Yuan & Mao, Guozhu & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Duan, Huabo, 2017. "Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 358-368.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3696-:d:175727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.