IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i3p178-d1360938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slow Work: The Mainstream Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Maria João Silvestre

    (Centre for Administration and Public Policies (CAPP), Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Lisbon University (ISCSP-UL), Rua Almerindo Lessa, 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Sónia P. Gonçalves

    (Centre for Administration and Public Policies (CAPP), Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Lisbon University (ISCSP-UL), Rua Almerindo Lessa, 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Maria João Velez

    (Department of Human Resources and Organizational Behavior, University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

The global acceleration of the pace of life has led to an increase in working hours, time pressure, and intensification of work tasks in organisations, with consequences for the physical and psychological health of workers. This acceleration and its consequences make it especially relevant to consider the principles of the slow movement and how they can be applied to the work context, focusing on the importance of slowing down the current pace of work and its implications for the sustainability of people and organisations. The key purpose of this study is to define the concept of slow work and understand its relationship with individual and organisational factors in order to extract the structuring dimensions, enabling its empirical study and practical application. Using grounded theory methodology, we conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with leaders of organisations from different sectors. Data analysis was performed using the MAXQDA programme. It was concluded that slow work is a way of working that respects the balance between individual rhythms and the objectives of the organisation, in favour of the sustainability of both parties, and that advocates qualitative goals, thinking time, individual recovery, purpose, and the humanisation of work. The main contribution is the conceptualisation of a construct that may be used in future studies, as well as in the development of organisational policies promoting the slow work culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria João Silvestre & Sónia P. Gonçalves & Maria João Velez, 2024. "Slow Work: The Mainstream Concept," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:178-:d:1360938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald Burke, 2009. "Working to Live or Living to Work: Should Individuals and Organizations Care?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 167-172, January.
    2. Blake A. Allan & Cassondra Batz-Barbarich & Haley M. Sterling & Louis Tay, 2019. "Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 500-528, May.
    3. Eliza Farelnik & Agnieszka Stanowicka, 2016. "Smart City, Slow City And Smart Slow City As Development Models Of Modern Cities," OLSZTYN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 359-370, November.
    4. Renate Rau & Antje Triemer, 2004. "Overtime in Relation to Blood Pressure and Mood During Work, Leisure, and Night Time," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 51-73, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Guanglei & Wang, Huaying & Li, Mingze, 2023. "“A Little Thanks Changes My World”: When and why dirty work employees feel meaningfulness at work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Francesco Pace & Giulia Sciotto & Naomi Alexia Randazzo & Vincenza Macaluso, 2022. "Teachers’ Work-Related Well-Being in Times of COVID-19: The Effects of Technostress and Online Teaching," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Cui, Dan & Wei, Xiang & Wu, Dianting & Cui, Nana & Nijkamp, Peter, 2019. "Leisure time and labor productivity: A new economic view rooted from sociological perspective," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-24.
    4. Marcin Janusz & Marcin Kowalczyk, 2022. "How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Stephan, Ute & Tavares, Susana M. & Carvalho, Helena & Ramalho, Joaquim J.S. & Santos, Susana C. & van Veldhoven, Marc, 2020. "Self-employment and eudaimonic well-being: Energized by meaning, enabled by societal legitimacy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).
    6. Wojciech Kozlowski & Kacper Suwar, 2021. "Smart City: Definitions, Dimensions, and Initiatives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 509-520.
    7. Ekaterina Uglanova & Jan Dettmers, 2018. "Sustained Effects of Flexible Working Time Arrangements on Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1727-1748, August.
    8. Ana Junça-Silva & Sónia Silva & António Caetano, 2022. "Job crafting, meaningful work and performance: a moderated mediation approach of presenteeism," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Chama CHIPETA & Thomas HABANABAKIZE & Mulatu Fekadu ZERIHUN, 2024. "The Non-Agricultural Labour Productivity Effects of Working Time: South Africa’s Case," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, February.
    10. Nikolova, Milena & Cnossen, Femke, 2020. "What makes work meaningful and why economists should care about it," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Zhou, Qin & Sacramento, Claudia & Martinaityte, Ieva, 2023. "Work meaningfulness and performance among healthcare professionals: The role of professional respect and participative management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Ramona Ciolac & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Andrea Feher & Sorin Stanciu, 2022. "Smart Tourist Village—An Entrepreneurial Necessity for Maramures Rural Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Jasmin Wiefek & Kathrin Heinitz, 2021. "The Common Good Balance Sheet and Employees’ Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Åsa Bergman Bruhn, 2022. "The Double-Sided Nature of Meaningful Work: Promoting and Challenging Factors within the Swedish Equine Sector," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Weziak-Bialowolska, Dorota & Lee, Matthew T. & Cowden, Richard G. & Bialowolski, Piotr & Chen, Ying & VanderWeele, Tyler J. & McNeely, Eileen, 2023. "Psychological caring climate at work, mental health, well-being, and work-related outcomes: Evidence from a longitudinal study and health insurance data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    16. Justyna Wiktorowicz & Izabela Warwas & Dariusz Turek & Iwa Kuchciak, 2022. "Does generativity matter? A meta-analysis on individual work outcomes," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 977-995, December.
    17. Eliza Farelnik, 2021. "Revitalisation as a tool for the development of slow city (Cittaslow)," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 169-185, December.
    18. Steven A. Brieger & Stefan Anderer & Andreas Fröhlich & Anne Bäro & Timo Meynhardt, 2020. "Too Much of a Good Thing? On the Relationship Between CSR and Employee Work Addiction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 311-329, October.
    19. Xiang Wei & Hailin Qu & Emily Ma, 2016. "How Does Leisure Time Affect Production Efficiency? Evidence from China, Japan, and the US," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 101-122, May.
    20. Simon L. Albrecht & Camille R. Green & Andrew Marty, 2021. "Meaningful Work, Job Resources, and Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:178-:d:1360938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.