IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v6y2018i1p20-d135300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Exponential Estimate of the Ultimate Ruin Probability for the Non-Homogeneous Renewal Risk Model

Author

Listed:
  • Edita Kizinevič

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University, Naugarduko 24, LT-03225 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Jonas Šiaulys

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University, Naugarduko 24, LT-03225 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

In this work, the non-homogeneous risk model is considered. In such a model, claims and inter-arrival times are independent but possibly non-identically distributed. The easily verifiable conditions are found such that the ultimate ruin probability of the model satisfies the exponential estimate exp { − ϱ u } for all values of the initial surplus u ⩾ 0 . Algorithms to estimate the positive constant ϱ are also presented. In fact, these algorithms are the main contribution of this work. Sharpness of the derived inequalities is illustrated by several numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Edita Kizinevič & Jonas Šiaulys, 2018. "The Exponential Estimate of the Ultimate Ruin Probability for the Non-Homogeneous Renewal Risk Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:20-:d:135300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/6/1/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/6/1/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing-Fang Huang & Ting Zhang & Yang Yang & Tao Jiang, 2017. "Ruin Probabilities in a Dependent Discrete-Time Risk Model With Gamma-Like Tailed Insurance Risks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Raducan, Anisoara Maria & Vernic, Raluca & Zbaganu, Gheorghita, 2015. "Recursive Calculation Of Ruin Probabilities At Or Before Claim Instants For Non-Identically Distributed Claims," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 421-443, May.
    3. Corina Constantinescu & Suhang Dai & Weihong Ni & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2016. "Ruin Probabilities with Dependence on the Number of Claims within a Fixed Time Window," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Dickson,David C. M., 2005. "Insurance Risk and Ruin," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521846400.
    5. Fu, Ke-Ang & Ng, Cheuk Yin Andrew, 2017. "Uniform asymptotics for the ruin probabilities of a two-dimensional renewal risk model with dependent claims and risky investments," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 227-235.
    6. Kaiyong Wang & Yuebao Wang & Qingwu Gao, 2013. "Uniform Asymptotics for the Finite-Time Ruin Probability of a Dependent Risk Model with a Constant Interest Rate," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 109-124, March.
    7. Shen, Xinmei & Xu, Menghao & Mills, Ebenezer Fiifi Emire Atta, 2016. "Precise large deviation results for sums of sub-exponential claims in a size-dependent renewal risk model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 6-13.
    8. Bernackaitė, Emilija & Šiaulys, Jonas, 2015. "The exponential moment tail of inhomogeneous renewal process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 9-15.
    9. Sgibnev, M. S., 1997. "Submultiplicative moments of the supremum of a random walk with negative drift," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 377-383, April.
    10. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2008. "On Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Classical Risk Models," Post-Print hal-00168958, HAL.
    11. Chen, Yiqing & Ng, Kai W., 2007. "The ruin probability of the renewal model with constant interest force and negatively dependent heavy-tailed claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 415-423, May.
    12. Krzysztof Burnecki & Mario Nicoló Giuricich, 2017. "Stable Weak Approximation at Work in Index-Linked Catastrophe Bond Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Xijun Liu & Qingwu Gao, 2016. "Uniformly asymptotic behavior for the tail probability of discounted aggregate claims in the time-dependent risk model with upper tail asymptotically independent claims," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(18), pages 5341-5354, September.
    14. Embrechts, P. & Veraverbeke, N., 1982. "Estimates for the probability of ruin with special emphasis on the possibility of large claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 55-72, January.
    15. Thorin, Olof, 1974. "Some Comments on the Sparre Andersen Model in the Risk Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 104-125, September.
    16. De Vylder, F. & Goovaerts, M. J., 1988. "Recursive calculation of finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olena Ragulina & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Upper Bounds and Explicit Formulas for the Ruin Probability in the Risk Model with Stochastic Premiums and a Multi-Layer Dividend Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-35, October.
    2. Tautvydas Kuras & Jonas Sprindys & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Martingale Approach to Derive Lundberg-Type Inequalities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Andrius Grigutis & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Ultimate Time Survival Probability in Three-Risk Discrete Time Risk Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrius Grigutis & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Ultimate Time Survival Probability in Three-Risk Discrete Time Risk Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Julien Trufin & Stéphane Loisel, 2013. "Ultimate ruin probability in discrete time with Bühlmann credibility premium adjustments," Post-Print hal-00426790, HAL.
    3. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 425-441, September.
    4. Tautvydas Kuras & Jonas Sprindys & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Martingale Approach to Derive Lundberg-Type Inequalities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Dutang, C. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2013. "On an asymptotic rule A+B/u for ultimate ruin probabilities under dependence by mixing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 774-785.
    6. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00746251 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jiang, Tao & Wang, Yuebao & Chen, Yang & Xu, Hui, 2015. "Uniform asymptotic estimate for finite-time ruin probabilities of a time-dependent bidimensional renewal model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 45-53.
    8. Gao, Qingwu & Liu, Xijun, 2013. "Uniform asymptotics for the finite-time ruin probability with upper tail asymptotically independent claims and constant force of interest," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(6), pages 1527-1538.
    9. Jostein Paulsen, 2008. "Ruin models with investment income," Papers 0806.4125, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2008.
    10. Irmina Czarna & Zbigniew Palmowski, 2009. "De Finetti's dividend problem and impulse control for a two-dimensional insurance risk process," Papers 0906.2100, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2011.
    11. Wang, Zijia & Landriault, David & Li, Shu, 2021. "An insurance risk process with a generalized income process: A solvency analysis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 133-146.
    12. Gao, Qingwu & Lin, Jia’nan & Liu, Xijun, 2023. "Large deviations of aggregate amount of claims in compound risk model with arbitrary dependence between claim sizes and waiting times," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. He, Yue & Kawai, Reiichiro, 2022. "Moment and polynomial bounds for ruin-related quantities in risk theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1255-1271.
    14. Ka-Meng Siu & Ka-Hou Chan & Sio-Kei Im, 2023. "A Study of Assessment of Casinos’ Risk of Ruin in Casino Games with Poisson Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Stéphane Loisel & Claude Lefèvre, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Post-Print hal-00201377, HAL.
    16. Leipus, Remigijus & Siaulys, Jonas, 2007. "Asymptotic behaviour of the finite-time ruin probability under subexponential claim sizes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 498-508, May.
    17. Li Qin & Susan M. Pitts, 2012. "Nonparametric Estimation of the Finite-Time Survival Probability with Zero Initial Capital in the Classical Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 919-936, December.
    18. Romain Biard & Stéphane Loisel & Claudio Macci & Noel Veraverbeke, 2010. "Asymptotic behavior of the finite-time expected time-integrated negative part of some risk processes and optimal reserve allocation," Post-Print hal-00372525, HAL.
    19. Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu, 2022. "Multiple-Trigger Catastrophe Bond Pricing Model and Its Simulation Using Numerical Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Remigijus Leipus & Jonas Šiaulys, 2009. "Asymptotic behaviour of the finite‐time ruin probability in renewal risk models," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 309-321, May.
    21. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2022. "Dynamic conditional mean risk sharing in the compound Poisson surplus model," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2022034, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:20-:d:135300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.