IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v302y2022i3p1255-1271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moment and polynomial bounds for ruin-related quantities in risk theory

Author

Listed:
  • He, Yue
  • Kawai, Reiichiro

Abstract

We establish a novel numerical quantification method based upon mathematical programming for the ruin-related quantities on collective risk models with fairly general features, such as reflecting, non-homogeneous and multidimensional dynamics with non-smooth coefficients. Rather than seeking approximations with a great deal of computing effort as in the existing numerical approximation methods, the proposed method aims to instantly provide deterministic upper and lower bounds for such quantities as linear combinations of moments or in the explicit polynomial form, without random number generation or sophisticated numerical algorithms. Given that closed-form solutions are rarely available especially in finite-time problems, the upper and lower bounds have great potential to be useful information that can complement approximate solutions obtained from existing numerical methods. We present numerical results throughout to justify the theoretical developments and convergence results so as to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method with low computational complexity. We also demonstrate further improvements of the bounds by scaling the problem domain, employing piecewise polynomial test functions and the exponential tempering of the polynomial bases.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Yue & Kawai, Reiichiro, 2022. "Moment and polynomial bounds for ruin-related quantities in risk theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1255-1271.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:302:y:2022:i:3:p:1255-1271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722000789
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Cai & Hans Gerber & Hailiang Yang, 2006. "Optimal Dividends In An Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Type Model With Credit And Debit Interest," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 94-108.
    2. Raducan, Anisoara Maria & Vernic, Raluca & Zbaganu, Gheorghita, 2015. "Recursive Calculation Of Ruin Probabilities At Or Before Claim Instants For Non-Identically Distributed Claims," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 421-443, May.
    3. Anna Frolova & Serguei Pergamenshchikov & Yuri Kabanov, 2002. "In the insurance business risky investments are dangerous," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 227-235.
    4. Gatto, Riccardo, 2008. "A saddlepoint approximation to the probability of ruin in the compound Poisson process with diffusion," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(13), pages 1948-1954, September.
    5. Lee, Wing Yan & Li, Xiaolong & Liu, Fangda & Shi, Yifan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2021. "A Fourier-cosine method for finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 256-267.
    6. Cai, Jun & Li, Haijun, 2007. "Dependence properties and bounds for ruin probabilities in multivariate compound risk models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 757-773, April.
    7. Asmussen, Soren & Rolski, Tomasz, 1992. "Computational methods in risk theory: A matrix-algorithmic approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 259-274, January.
    8. Jun-ya Gotoh & Hiroshi Konno, 2002. "Bounding Option Prices by Semidefinite Programming: A Cutting Plane Algorithm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 665-678, May.
    9. Dickson, David C. M. & Waters, Howard R., 1999. "Ruin probabilities with compounding assets," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 49-62, September.
    10. Luo, Shangzhen & Taksar, Michael & Tsoi, Allanus, 2008. "On reinsurance and investment for large insurance portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-444, February.
    11. Usabel, Miguel A., 1998. "Applications to risk theory of a Monte Carlo multiple integration method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 71-83, October.
    12. Thorin, Olof & Wikstad, Nils, 1973. "Numerical evaluation of ruin probabilities for a finite period," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 137-153, September.
    13. Bjorn Eriksson & Martijn Pistorius, 2011. "Method Of Moments Approach To Pricing Double Barrier Contracts In Polynomial Jump-Diffusion Models," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(07), pages 1139-1158.
    14. Biard, Romain & Lefèvre, Claude & Loisel, Stéphane, 2008. "Impact of correlation crises in risk theory: Asymptotics of finite-time ruin probabilities for heavy-tailed claim amounts when some independence and stationarity assumptions are relaxed," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 412-421, December.
    15. Chen, Shumin & Li, Zhongfei & Li, Kemian, 2010. "Optimal investment-reinsurance policy for an insurance company with VaR constraint," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 144-153, October.
    16. S. David Promislow & Virginia Young, 2005. "Minimizing the Probability of Ruin When Claims Follow Brownian Motion with Drift," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 110-128.
    17. Jostein Paulsen, 2008. "Ruin models with investment income," Papers 0806.4125, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2008.
    18. De Vylder, F. & Goovaerts, M. J., 1988. "Recursive calculation of finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, January.
    19. Bai, Lihua & Guo, Junyi, 2008. "Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment with multiple risky assets and no-shorting constraint," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 968-975, June.
    20. Coulibaly, Ibrahim & Lefèvre, Claude, 2008. "On a simple quasi-Monte Carlo approach for classical ultimate ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 935-942, June.
    21. Riccardo Gatto & Benjamin Baumgartner, 2016. "Saddlepoint Approximations to the Probability of Ruin in Finite Time for the Compound Poisson Risk Process Perturbed by Diffusion," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 217-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Yue & Kawai, Reiichiro & Shimizu, Yasutaka & Yamazaki, Kazutoshi, 2023. "The Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function: A review from practical perspectives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-28.
    2. Yue He & Reiichiro Kawai & Yasutaka Shimizu & Kazutoshi Yamazaki, 2022. "The Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function: A review from practical perspectives," Papers 2203.10680, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Landriault, David & Li, Bin & Li, Danping & Li, Dongchen, 2016. "A pair of optimal reinsurance–investment strategies in the two-sided exit framework," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 284-294.
    2. Gu, Ailing & Guo, Xianping & Li, Zhongfei & Zeng, Yan, 2012. "Optimal control of excess-of-loss reinsurance and investment for insurers under a CEV model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 674-684.
    3. Yi, Bo & Li, Zhongfei & Viens, Frederi G. & Zeng, Yan, 2013. "Robust optimal control for an insurer with reinsurance and investment under Heston’s stochastic volatility model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 601-614.
    4. Pun, Chi Seng & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2015. "Robust investment–reinsurance optimization with multiscale stochastic volatility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 245-256.
    5. Peng, Xingchun & Hu, Yijun, 2013. "Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment under partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 416-428.
    6. Qicai Li & Mengdi Gu & Zhibing Liang, 2014. "Optimal excess-of-loss reinsurance and investment polices under the CEV model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 273-290, December.
    7. Ya Huang & Xiangqun Yang & Jieming Zhou, 2017. "Robust optimal investment and reinsurance problem for a general insurance company under Heston model," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 85(2), pages 305-326, April.
    8. Liang, Zhibin & Yuen, Kam Chuen & Guo, Junyi, 2011. "Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment in a stock market with Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 207-215, September.
    9. Pun, Chi Seng & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2016. "Robust non-zero-sum stochastic differential reinsurance game," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 169-177.
    10. Xu, Lin & Zhang, Liming & Yao, Dingjun, 2017. "Optimal investment and reinsurance for an insurer under Markov-modulated financial market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 7-19.
    11. Liang, Zhibin & Bayraktar, Erhan, 2014. "Optimal reinsurance and investment with unobservable claim size and intensity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 156-166.
    12. Yan, Tingjin & Park, Kyunghyun & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2022. "Irreversible reinsurance: A singular control approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 326-348.
    13. Zilan Liu & Yijun Wang & Ya Huang & Jieming Zhou, 2022. "Optimal Time-Consistent Investment and Premium Control Strategies for Insurers with Constraint under the Heston Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Li, Zhongfei & Zeng, Yan & Lai, Yongzeng, 2012. "Optimal time-consistent investment and reinsurance strategies for insurers under Heston’s SV model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 191-203.
    15. Peng, Xingchun & Chen, Fenge & Hu, Yijun, 2014. "Optimal investment, consumption and proportional reinsurance under model uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 222-234.
    16. Zhang, Xin & Meng, Hui & Zeng, Yan, 2016. "Optimal investment and reinsurance strategies for insurers with generalized mean–variance premium principle and no-short selling," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 125-132.
    17. Zeng, Yan & Li, Zhongfei, 2011. "Optimal time-consistent investment and reinsurance policies for mean-variance insurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 145-154, July.
    18. Shihao Zhu & Jingtao Shi, 2019. "Optimal Reinsurance and Investment Strategies under Mean-Variance Criteria: Partial and Full Information," Papers 1906.08410, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    19. Zhao, Hui & Rong, Ximin & Zhao, Yonggan, 2013. "Optimal excess-of-loss reinsurance and investment problem for an insurer with jump–diffusion risk process under the Heston model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 504-514.
    20. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 425-441, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:302:y:2022:i:3:p:1255-1271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.