IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i24p4873-d1294105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Models with Negative System Outputs for the Efficiency Evaluation of Government Financial Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey V. Lychev

    (College of Information Technologies and Computer Sciences, National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, 4 Leninsky Avenue, Building 1, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

  • Svetlana V. Ratner

    (College of Information Technologies and Computer Sciences, National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, 4 Leninsky Avenue, Building 1, 119049 Moscow, Russia
    Department of Economic and Mathematical Modelling, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, 117198 Moscow, Russia
    Economic Dynamics and Innovation Management Laboratory, V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya Street, 117997 Moscow, Russia)

  • Vladimir E. Krivonozhko

    (College of Information Technologies and Computer Sciences, National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, 4 Leninsky Avenue, Building 1, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of several possible approaches to applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) in the case where some decision making units (DMUs) in the original sample have negative system outputs. In comparison to the traditional model of Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (CCR) and the CCR model with a scale shift to measure second-stage outputs, the range directional measure (RDM) model produces the most appropriate results. In this paper, an approach is proposed for estimating returns to scale. The study applies a two-stage DEA model with negative second-stage outputs to assess the public support for research, development, and demonstration projects in the energy sector in 23 countries over the period from 2010 to 2018. The assessment of government performance depends on its contribution to the growth of energy efficiency in the national economy and the reduction of its carbon intensity. Intermediate outputs (patents in the energy sector) are included in the analysis as both outputs of the first stage and inputs of the second stage. Taking the similarity between the calculations obtained without stage separation and the system efficiency calculations from the two-stage model as a measure of model adequacy, the RDM model shows the highest similarity scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey V. Lychev & Svetlana V. Ratner & Vladimir E. Krivonozhko, 2023. "Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Models with Negative System Outputs for the Efficiency Evaluation of Government Financial Policies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:4873-:d:1294105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/24/4873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/24/4873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hailemariam, Abebe & Ivanovski, Kris & Dzhumashev, Ratbek, 2022. "Does R&D investment in renewable energy technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    2. Svetlana Ratner & Konstantin Gomonov & Svetlana Revinova, 2023. "Public Funding for Energy Innovation and Decarbonization Goals: A Coherence Challenge," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 40-45, July.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Ruiyue Lin & Zhiping Chen, 2017. "A directional distance based super-efficiency DEA model handling negative data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(11), pages 1312-1322, November.
    5. Ram Pratap Sinha, 2015. "A Dynamic DEA Model for Indian Life Insurance Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(2), pages 258-269, April.
    6. Svetlana V. Ratner & Artem M. Shaposhnikov & Andrey V. Lychev, 2023. "Network DEA and Its Applications (2017–2022): A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Tone, Kaoru & Chang, Tsung-Sheng & Wu, Chen-Hui, 2020. "Handling negative data in slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 926-935.
    8. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Xu, Zhongwen & Chai, Jian & Yao, Liming & Wang, Shouyang & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "Efficiency evaluation for banking systems under uncertainty: A multi-period three-stage DEA model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 68-82.
    9. M C A Silva Portela & E Thanassoulis & G Simpson, 2004. "Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(10), pages 1111-1121, October.
    10. Chiang Kao, 2014. "Efficiency Decomposition in Network Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 55-77, Springer.
    11. Finn Førsund & Lennart Hjalmarsson & Vladimir Krivonozhko & Oleg Utkin, 2007. "Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: direct and indirect approaches," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 45-56, October.
    12. Yuan, Yuxin & Yuan, Xiaodong, 2023. "Does the development of fuel cell electric vehicles be reviving or recessional? Based on the patent analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    14. J A Sharp & W Meng & W Liu, 2007. "A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with ‘natural’ negative outputs and inputs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(12), pages 1672-1677, December.
    15. Svetlana Ratner & Yuri Chepurko & Larisa Drobyshecskaya & Anna Petrovskaya, 2018. "Management of Energy Enterprises: Energy-efficiency Approach in Solar Collectors Industry: The Case of Russia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 237-243.
    16. Kao, Chiang, 2020. "Measuring efficiency in a general production possibility set allowing for negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 980-988.
    17. Scheel, Holger, 2001. "Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 400-410, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Shuguang & Shi, Hai-Liu & Wang, Ying-Ming, 2022. "An integrated slacks-based super-efficiency measure in the presence of nonpositive data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Tavana, Madjid & Izadikhah, Mohammad & Toloo, Mehdi & Roostaee, Razieh, 2021. "A new non-radial directional distance model for data envelopment analysis problems with negative and flexible measures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Amineh Ghazi & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Masoud Sanei, 2020. "Hybrid efficiency measurement and target setting based on identifying defining hyperplanes of the PPS with negative data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 1055-1092, June.
    4. Kao, Chiang, 2020. "Measuring efficiency in a general production possibility set allowing for negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 980-988.
    5. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "Measuring efficiency in a general production possibility set allowing for negative data: An extension and a focus on returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 267-276.
    6. Lin, Ruiyue & Liu, Yue, 2019. "Super-efficiency based on the directional distance function in the presence of negative data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 26-34.
    7. Mohammad Izadikhah & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Razieh Roostaee, 2018. "How to assess sustainability of suppliers in the presence of volume discount and negative data in data envelopment analysis?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 241-267, October.
    8. Youchao Tan & Udaya Shetty & Ali Diabat & T. Pakkala, 2015. "Aggregate directional distance formulation of DEA with integer variables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 741-756, December.
    9. Tone, Kaoru & Chang, Tsung-Sheng & Wu, Chen-Hui, 2020. "Handling negative data in slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 926-935.
    10. Cheng, Gang & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis & Qian, Zhenhua, 2013. "A variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 100-105.
    11. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2021. "Slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency in presence of nonpositive data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Mehdiloozad, Mahmood & Zhu, Joe & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2018. "Identification of congestion in data envelopment analysis under the occurrence of multiple projections: A reliable method capable of dealing with negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 644-654.
    13. Sahoo, Biresh K & Khoveyni, Mohammad & Eslami, Robabeh & Chaudhury, Pradipta, 2016. "Returns to scale and most productive scale size in DEA with negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 545-558.
    14. Ruiyue Lin & Zhiping Chen & Qianhui Hu & Zongxin Li, 2017. "Dynamic network DEA approach with diversification to multi-period performance evaluation of funds," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 821-860, July.
    15. K Kerstens & I Van de Woestyne, 2011. "Negative data in DEA: a simple proportional distance function approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1413-1419, July.
    16. Chiu, Yung-Ho & Lee, Jen-Hui & Lu, Ching-Cheng & Shyu, Ming-Kuang & Luo, Zhengying, 2012. "The technology gap and efficiency measure in WEC countries: Application of the hybrid meta frontier model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 349-357.
    17. Lin, Ruiyue & Liu, Qian, 2021. "Multiplier dynamic data envelopment analysis based on directional distance function: An application to mutual funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1043-1057.
    18. Asmild, Mette & Pastor, Jesús T., 2010. "Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 475-483, December.
    19. Cordero Ferrera, Jose Manuel & Alonso Morán, Edurne & Nuño Solís, Roberto & Orueta, Juan F. & Souto Arce, Regina, 2013. "Efficiency assessment of primary care providers: A conditional nonparametric approach," MPRA Paper 51926, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Ruiyue Lin & Zhiping Chen, 2017. "A directional distance based super-efficiency DEA model handling negative data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(11), pages 1312-1322, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:4873-:d:1294105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.