IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i24p4714-d1000676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Multi-Objective Multi-Robot Task Allocation by Lin–Kernighan–Helsgaun Guided Evolutionary Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenqiang Zhang

    (Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

  • Sile Ma

    (Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
    School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Xiangyuan Jiang

    (Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)

Abstract

Multi-robot task allocation (MRTA) and route planning are crucial for a large-scale multi-robot system. In this paper, the problem is formulated to minimize the total energy consumption and overall task completion time simultaneously, with some constraints taken into consideration. To represent a solution, a novel one-chromosome representation technique is proposed, which eases the consequent genetic operations and the construction of the cost matrix. Lin–Kernighan–Helsgaun (LKH), a highly efficient sub-tour planner, is employed to generate prophet generation beforehand as well as guide the evolutionary direction during the proceeding of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, aiming to promote convergence of the Pareto front. Numerical experiments on the benchmark show the LKH guidance mechanism is effective for two famous multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, namely multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA), of which LKH-guided NSGA exhibits the best performance on three predefined indicators, namely C-metric, HV, and Spacing, respectively. The generalization experiment on a multiple depots MRTA problem with constraints further demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach for practical decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenqiang Zhang & Sile Ma & Xiangyuan Jiang, 2022. "Research on Multi-Objective Multi-Robot Task Allocation by Lin–Kernighan–Helsgaun Guided Evolutionary Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4714-:d:1000676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4714/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4714/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beume, Nicola & Naujoks, Boris & Emmerich, Michael, 2007. "SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1653-1669, September.
    2. Abdul Karim Feroz & Hangjung Zo & Ananth Chiravuri, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Bektas, Tolga, 2006. "The multiple traveling salesman problem: an overview of formulations and solution procedures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 209-219, June.
    4. Carter, Arthur E. & Ragsdale, Cliff T., 2006. "A new approach to solving the multiple traveling salesperson problem using genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 246-257, November.
    5. Helsgaun, Keld, 2000. "An effective implementation of the Lin-Kernighan traveling salesman heuristic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 106-130, October.
    6. André Hanelt & René Bohnsack & David Marz & Cláudia Antunes Marante, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1159-1197, July.
    7. H. P. Benson, 1998. "Further Analysis of an Outcome Set-Based Algorithm for Multiple-Objective Linear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Yuan, Shuai & Skinner, Bradley & Huang, Shoudong & Liu, Dikai, 2013. "A new crossover approach for solving the multiple travelling salesmen problem using genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 72-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haluk Yapicioglu, 2018. "Multiperiod Multi Traveling Salesmen Problem Considering Time Window Constraints with an Application to a Real World Case," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 773-801, December.
    2. Sonela Stillo & Gentisa Furxhi, 2016. "The Retention of the Employees as Long as Possible in the Organization, Through Finding the Right Factors of Motivation. Albania as a Case of Study," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    3. He, Pengfei & Hao, Jin-Kao, 2023. "Memetic search for the minmax multiple traveling salesman problem with single and multiple depots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1055-1070.
    4. José Alejandro Cornejo-Acosta & Jesús García-Díaz & Julio César Pérez-Sansalvador & Carlos Segura, 2023. "Compact Integer Programs for Depot-Free Multiple Traveling Salesperson Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Yuan, Shuai & Skinner, Bradley & Huang, Shoudong & Liu, Dikai, 2013. "A new crossover approach for solving the multiple travelling salesmen problem using genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 72-82.
    6. Daniel Beverungen & Thomas Hess & Antonia Köster & Christiane Lehrer, 2022. "From private digital platforms to public data spaces: implications for the digital transformation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 493-501, June.
    7. Tamás Kalmár-Nagy & Giovanni Giardini & Bendegúz Dezső Bak, 2017. "The Multiagent Planning Problem," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, February.
    8. Wenjing Zu & Guoda Gu & Sihan Lei, 2022. "Does Digital Transformation in Manufacturing Affect Trade Imbalances? Evidence from US–China Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Culley, D.M. & Funke, S.W. & Kramer, S.C. & Piggott, M.D., 2016. "Integration of cost modelling within the micro-siting design optimisation of tidal turbine arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 215-227.
    10. Mishra, Deepa Bhatt & Haider, Imran & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Sakib, Md. Nazmus & Malik, Nishtha & Rana, Nripendra P., 2023. "“Better together”: Right blend of business strategy and digital transformation strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    11. Jose Carlos Molina & Ignacio Eguia & Jesus Racero, 2018. "An optimization approach for designing routes in metrological control services: a case study," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 924-952, December.
    12. Hyun Seop Uhm & Young Hoon Lee, 2022. "Vehicle routing problem under safe separation distance for multiple unmanned aerial vehicle operation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5107-5136, November.
    13. repec:hal:journl:hal-03650216 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Long Xue & Qianyu Zhang & Xuemang Zhang & Chengyu Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Anurag Agarwal, 2009. "Theoretical insights into the augmented-neural-network approach for combinatorial optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 101-117, April.
    17. Liagkouras, Konstantinos & Metaxiotis, Konstantinos, 2021. "Improving multi-objective algorithms performance by emulating behaviors from the human social analogue in candidate solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1019-1036.
    18. Papanagnou, Christos & Seiler, Andreas & Spanaki, Konstantina & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Bourlakis, Michael, 2022. "Data-driven digital transformation for emergency situations: The case of the UK retail sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    19. Markus Menz & Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & David J. Collis & Nicolai J. Foss & Robert E. Hoskisson & John E. Prescott, 2021. "Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1695-1720, November.
    20. A. Scholz & G. Wäscher, 2017. "Order Batching and Picker Routing in manual order picking systems: the benefits of integrated routing," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(2), pages 491-520, June.
    21. Hossein Rahnama & Kerstin Johansen & Lisa Larsson & Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck, 2022. "Collaboration in Value Constellations for Sustainable Production: The Perspective of Small Technology Solution Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4714-:d:1000676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.