IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v8y2024i1p6-d1313292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Supply Chains Made Visible through Logistics Security Management

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Emilio Mora Lozano

    (Faculty of Economics, Administratives and Accounting Sciences, Institución Universitaria Americana, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
    School of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 250001, Colombia)

  • Jairo R. Montoya-Torres

    (School of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 250001, Colombia)

Abstract

Background: For several years, two of the major concerns of logistics managers are (i) the visibility of global supply chains and (ii) the uncertainty in deciding which existing logistics security program is the most appropriate according to the security levels for their organization. This last decision is needed to ensure traceability and visibility of the supply chain. The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of the main public and private supply chain security management programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods: A qualitative and quantitative research methodology based on thematic content analysis is followed. The four main existing security programs in Latin America and the Caribbean are systematically compared and a common general framework is developed. Results: The analysis shows a high degree of similarity between the levels of security contained in the selected programs. Conclusions: We found that there is little guidance available for companies interested in managing security risks in their supply chains through these logistics’ security programs. This article contributes to the literature on logistics security programs that is currently gaining momentum in managing security risks in global supply chains and provides academic insights into the choice and/or complementarity of one or more logistics security programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Emilio Mora Lozano & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres, 2024. "Global Supply Chains Made Visible through Logistics Security Management," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-39, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:6-:d:1313292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bagchi, Aniruddha & Paul, Jomon A., 2017. "Espionage and the optimal standard of the Customs-Trade Partnership against Terrorism (C-TPAT) program in maritime security," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 89-107.
    2. Kalaiarasan, Ravi & Olhager, Jan & Agrawal, Tarun Kumar & Wiktorsson, Magnus, 2022. "The ABCDE of supply chain visibility: A systematic literature review and framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Maria G. Burns, 2018. "Participatory Operational & Security Assessment on homeland security risks: an empirical research method for improving security beyond the borders through public/private partnerships," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 85-100, December.
    4. Yu, Min-Chun & Goh, Mark, 2014. "A multi-objective approach to supply chain visibility and risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 125-130.
    5. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    6. Mohammad Ebrahim Nikoofal & Morteza Pourakbar & Mehmet Gumus, 2023. "Securing containerized supply chain through public and private partnership," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2341-2361, July.
    7. Thierry Houe & Eileen Murphy, 2018. "The AEO status as a source of competitive advantage," Post-Print hal-01921801, HAL.
    8. William J. Ritchie & Steven A. Melnyk, 2012. "The impact of emerging institutional norms on adoption timing decisions: evidence from C‐TPAT—A government antiterrorism initiative," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7), pages 860-870, July.
    9. Tong, Xun & Lai, Kee-hung & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Supply chain security certification and operational performance: The role of upstream complexity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    2. Tong, Xun & Lai, Kee-hung & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Supply chain security certification and operational performance: The role of upstream complexity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    3. Kefeng Xu & Yang Dong & Yu Xia, 2014. "‘Too Little’ or ‘Too Late’: The Timing of Supply Chain Demand Collaboration," Working Papers 0203mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    4. Nooraie, S. Vahid & Mellat Parast, Mahour, 2015. "A multi-objective approach to supply chain risk management: Integrating visibility with supply and demand risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 192-200.
    5. Maria Burns, 2019. "Containerized cargo security at the U.S. – Mexico border: how supply chain vulnerabilities impact processing times at land ports of entry," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 57-71, June.
    6. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    7. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.
    8. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.
    9. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    10. Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Alizadeh Ganji & Mohammad Hayati, 2016. "Identifying and Assessing the Risks in the Supply Chain," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 1-74, June.
    11. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    12. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    13. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.
    14. Rika Ampuh Hadiguna, 2012. "Decision support framework for risk assessment of sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 35-54.
    15. Johnson, Mark & Mena, Carlos, 2008. "Supply chain management for servitised products: A multi-industry case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 27-39, July.
    16. Han, Xiaohua & Wu, Haiyan & Yang, Qianxia & Shang, Jennifer, 2016. "Reverse channel selection under remanufacturing risks: Balancing profitability and robustness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 63-72.
    17. Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Alessandro Creazza & Marco Melacini & Fabrizio Dallari, 2022. "Heading for Tomorrow: Resilience Strategies for Post-COVID-19 Grocery Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. He, Yuanqiong & Keung Lai, Kin & Sun, Hongyi & Chen, Yun, 2014. "The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 260-270.
    19. Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal & Heydari, Jafar, 2010. "Supply chain coordination for the joint determination of order quantity and reorder point using credit option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 86-95, July.
    20. Raka, Chatchai & Liangrokapart, Jirapan, 2015. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Case Study in Thailand," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 20, pages 557-580, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:6-:d:1313292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.