IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i2p51-d319790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconstruction of China’s Farmland Rights System Based on the ‘Trifurcation of Land Rights’ Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Linlin Li

    (Department of Land Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Rong Tan

    (Department of Land Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Cifang Wu

    (Department of Land Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, 310058, China
    Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

With the aim of improving farmland use efficiency without damaging the social function of farmland, Chinese policymakers have proposed the ‘trifurcation of land rights’ reform. When it comes to realization of the law, however, neither the Ownership Model nor the Bundle of Sticks Model can adequately explain this reform. The tree concept of property, which provides a new perspective in delineating property rights based on the function served by specific properties, is thus adopted. We find that this tree concept of property helps to better understand and realize the trifurcated rights on farmland in China. Also, a balance between the social and economic functions of farmland can be reached through reconstruction of the property rights involved, a process which comprises three steps: identification of the nature of the newly-established rights; configuration of the rights and duties of relevant entities; and state intervention in the enforcement of relevant rights with the aim of realizing certain social values. Finally, this paper argues that success of this trifurcated structure requires a systematic design of the Chinese Civil Code. In particular, it requests further improvements in legal rules on farmland lease.

Suggested Citation

  • Linlin Li & Rong Tan & Cifang Wu, 2020. "Reconstruction of China’s Farmland Rights System Based on the ‘Trifurcation of Land Rights’ Reform," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:51-:d:319790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Yuting & Huang, Xianjin & Bao, Helen X.H. & Ju, Xiang & Zhong, Taiyang & Chen, Zhigang & Zhou, Yan, 2018. "Rural land rights reform and agro-environmental sustainability: Empirical evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 73-87.
    2. Ciaian, Pavel, & Kancs, d’Artis & Swinnen, Jo & Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, 2012. "Key Issues and Developments in Farmland Sales Markets in the EU Member States and Candidate Countries," Factor Markets Working Papers 114, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    3. Lin, Justin Yifu, 1990. "Collectivization and China's Agricultural Crisis in 1959-1961," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(6), pages 1228-1252, December.
    4. Li, Ang & Wu, Jianguo & Zhang, Xueyao & Xue, Jianguo & Liu, Zhifeng & Han, Xingguo & Huang, Jianhui, 2018. "China’s new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation: Evidence from Inner Mongolia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 170-182.
    5. Maëlys de La Rupelle & Deng Quheng & Li Shi & Thomas Vendryes, 2009. "Land rights insecurity and temporary migration in rural China," PSE Working Papers halshs-00575041, HAL.
    6. Ciaian, Pavel, & Kancs, d’Artis & Swinnen, Jo & Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, 2012. "Rental Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in EU Member States and Candidate Countries," Factor Markets Working Papers 117, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    7. Jean-Philippe Platteau, 2002. "The Gradual Erosion of the Social Security Function of Customary Land Tenure Arrangements in Lineage-Based Societies," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-26, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Kung James, Kaising, 1995. "Equal Entitlement versus Tenure Security under a Regime of Collective Property Rights: Peasants' Preference for Institutions in Post-reform Chinese Agriculture," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 82-111, August.
    9. Shouying Liu & Ruimin Wang & Guang Shi, 2018. "Historical Transformation of China's Agriculture: Productivity Changes and Other Key Features," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 26(1), pages 42-65, January.
    10. Ciaian, Pavel, & Kancs, d’Artis & Swinnen, Jo & Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, 2012. "Key Issues and Developments in Farmland Rental Markets in EU Member States and Candidate Countries," Factor Markets Working Papers 115, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    11. Daniel W. Bromley, 1978. "Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Environmental Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 43-60, March.
    12. Yansui Liu & Yuanzhi Guo & Yang Zhou, 2018. "Poverty alleviation in rural China: policy changes, future challenges and policy implications," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 241-259, May.
    13. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank F. K. Byamugisha, 2021. "Experiences and Development Impacts of Securing Land Rights at Scale in Developing Countries: Case Studies of China and Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander März & Nadja Klein & Thomas Kneib & Oliver Musshoff, 2016. "Analysing farmland rental rates using Bayesian geoadditive quantile regression," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 663-698.
    2. Geoghegan, Cathal & Kinsella, Anne & O’Donoghue, Cathal, 2015. "Policy Drivers of Land Mobility in Irish Agriculture," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212658, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Bradfield, Tracy & Butler, Robert & Dillon, Emma J. & Hennessy, Thia, 2020. "The factors influencing the profitability of leased land on dairy farms in Ireland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Leonhardt, Heidi & Braito, Michael & Penker, Marianne, 2019. "Why do farmers care about rented land?," FORLand Working Papers 14 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    5. Hüttel, S. & Wildermann, L., 2015. "Price formation in agricultural land markets – how do different acquiring parties and sellers matter?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    6. Da Fang & Yan Guo, 2021. "Induced Agricultural Production Organizations under the Transition of Rural Land Market: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66.
    8. Letort, Élodie & Temesgen, Chalachew, 2014. "Influence of environmental policies on farmland prices in the Bretagne region of France," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 95(1).
    9. Stefan Seifert & Christoph Kahle & Silke Hüttel, 2021. "Price Dispersion in Farmland Markets: What Is the Role of Asymmetric Information?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1545-1568, August.
    10. Ma, Shuang & Mu, Ren, 2020. "Forced off the farm? Farmers’ labor allocation response to land requisition in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Jing Zhang & Colin Brown, 2018. "Spatial Variation and Factors Impacting Grassland Circulation Price in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Li, Shi & Vendryes, Thomas, 2018. "Real estate activity, democracy and land rights in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-79.
    13. Leonhardt, Heidi & Penker, Marianne & Salhofer, Klaus, 2019. "Do farmers care about rented land? A multi-method study on land tenure and soil conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 228-239.
    14. Qin, Ming & Lin, Wensheng & Li, Jing & Yu, Zhou & Wachenheim, Cheryl, 2020. "Impact of land registration and certification on land rental by Chinese farmers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. DRABIK, Dušan & RAJČÁNIOVÁ, Miroslava, 2014. "Agricultural Land Market In Slovakia Under The New Land Acquisition Law," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 17(2), pages 1-4, October.
    16. Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke, 2015. "The term structure of land lease rates," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 201664, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Lu Cai & Chaoqing Chai & Bangbang Zhang & Feng Yang & Wei Wang & Chengdong Zhang, 2022. "The Theoretical Approach and Practice of Farmland Rights System Reform from Decentralization to Centralization Promoting Agricultural Modernization: Evidence from Yuyang District in Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Rutkauskas Virgilijus & Gudauskaitė Laura, 2018. "Explaining the Changes of Agriculture Land Prices in Lithuania," Ekonomika (Economics), Sciendo, vol. 97(1), pages 63-75, January.
    19. Zhao, Xiaoxue, 2020. "Land and labor allocation under communal tenure: Theory and evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Thareau, Bertille & Billaud, Jean-Paul, 2021. "Farmers’ land strategies in peri-urban areas: the case of Angevin conurbation," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 102(1), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:51-:d:319790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.