IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i6p294-d1165890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Financial Market Outcomes Affect Gambling?

Author

Listed:
  • Cyrus A. Ramezani

    (Finance Department, Orfalea College of Business, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA)

  • James J. Ahern

    (Agribusiness Department, CAFES, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA)

Abstract

A large literature in behavioral finance explores how gambling sentiments influences trading in stocks. This paper considers the reverse phenomena; the impact of financial market outcomes on aggregate gambling expenditures. We expect the wealth effect of higher realized stock returns will increase gambling (entertainment good). Similarly, we expect rising volatility will attract gamblers to equity markets seeking thrill and skewed payouts. Utilizing novel horse wagering data (1934–2020), we study the impact of these forces on gambling expenditures. Using corporate bond spreads as a proxy for business cycles, we find that, in addition to financial market outcomes, price of wagering, incomes, and availability of competing betting products are important drivers of gambling. We also find that, ceteris paribus, gambling rises during recessions. Our findings will be of interest to policy makers and the finance industry, particularly as day trading, sports betting, online casinos, and other gambling gains broad public acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Cyrus A. Ramezani & James J. Ahern, 2023. "How Do Financial Market Outcomes Affect Gambling?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:294-:d:1165890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/6/294/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/6/294/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaffee, Dwight M., 1975. "Cyclical variations in the risk structure of interest rates," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 309-325, July.
    2. Malcolm Baker & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2007. "Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 129-152, Spring.
    3. Alok Kumar, 2009. "Who Gambles in the Stock Market?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1889-1933, August.
    4. Marco Di Maggio & Amir Kermani & Kaveh Majlesi, 2020. "Stock Market Returns and Consumption," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(6), pages 3175-3219, December.
    5. Gruen, Arthur, 1976. "An Inquiry into the Economics of Race-Track Gambling," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(1), pages 169-177, February.
    6. Greene, William, 2010. "Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 291-296, May.
    7. Chen, Yao & Kumar, Alok & Zhang, Chendi, 2021. "Searching for Gambles: Gambling Sentiment and Stock Market Outcomes," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(6), pages 2010-2038, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barberis, Nicholas & Xiong, Wei, 2012. "Realization utility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 251-271.
    2. Lin, Chaonan & Chen, Hong-Yi & Ko, Kuan-Cheng & Yang, Nien-Tzu, 2021. "Time-dependent lottery preference and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 272-294.
    3. Choi, Paul Moon Sub & Choi, Joung Hwa, 2018. "Is individual trading priced in stocks?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 76-92.
    4. Chen, Haozhi & Zhang, Yue, 2023. "Research on the effect of firm-specific investor sentiment on the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly: Evidence from the Chinese market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Alankar, Ashwin & Blausten, Peter & Scholes, Myron S., 2013. "The Cost of Constraints: Risk Management, Agency Theory and Asset Prices," Research Papers 2135, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    6. An, Suwei, 2023. "Essays on incentive contracts, M&As, and firm risk," Other publications TiSEM dd97d2f5-1c9d-47c5-ba62-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Polk, Christopher & Lou, Dong & Huang, Shiyang, 2016. "The Booms and Busts of Beta Arbitrage," CEPR Discussion Papers 11531, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Montone, Maurizio & van den Assem, Martijn J. & Zwinkels, Remco C.J., 2023. "Company name fluency and stock returns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Chiah, Mardy & Zhong, Angel, 2020. "Trading from home: The impact of COVID-19 on trading volume around the world," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    10. Mei-Chen Lin, 2020. "When analysts encounter lottery-like stocks: lottery-like stocks and analyst stock recommendations," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 327-353, July.
    11. Lou, Dong & Polk, Christopher & Huang, Shiyang, 2014. "The booms and busts of beta arbitrage," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119019, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Kwon, Kyung Yoon & Min, Byoung-Kyu & Sun, Chenfei, 2022. "Enhancing the profitability of lottery strategies," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 166-184.
    13. T. Clifton Green & Byoung-Hyoun Hwang, 2012. "Initial Public Offerings as Lotteries: Skewness Preference and First-Day Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 432-444, February.
    14. Lu, Jing & Ho, Keng-Yu & Ho, Po-Hsin & Ko, Kuan-Cheng, 2023. "CEO overconfidence, lottery preference and the cross-section of stock returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Nguyen, Hung T. & Pham, Mia Hang, 2021. "Air pollution and behavioral biases: Evidence from stock market anomalies," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    16. Fong, Wai Mun & Toh, Benjamin, 2014. "Investor sentiment and the MAX effect," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 190-201.
    17. Chelley-Steeley, Patricia L. & Lambertides, Neophytos, 2022. "Trading activity around chapter 11 filing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Chi Liao, 2023. "Risk‐taking begets risk‐taking: Evidence from casino openings and investor portfolios," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(1), pages 143-165, February.
    19. Liu, Xiaoqun & Zhang, Yuchen & Tian, Mengqiao & Chao, Youcong, 2023. "Financial distress and jump tail risk: Evidence from China's listed companies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 316-336.
    20. Xue, Lixing & Chen, Chong & Wang, Na & Zhang, Lirong, 2023. "Gambling culture and corporate financialization: Evidence from China's welfare lottery sales," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:294-:d:1165890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.