IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i3p145-d774475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intended Use of IPO Proceeds and Survival of Listed Companies in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Sarah Alyasa-Gan

    (Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Puncak Alam, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Norliza Che-Yahya

    (Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Puncak Alam, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

In the context of Malaysian companies’ survival, the potential role of intended use of proceeds as an influential factor remains unfamiliar. This study examines the link between the intended use of IPO proceeds and the survival of 423 Malaysian listed companies over the period of 2000–2014. This study distinguishes the use of IPO proceeds into three segregations: growth opportunities, debt repayment, and working capital. Employing the Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) survival model, the overall evidence shows a statistically significant effect of the intended use of IPO proceeds for growth opportunities and debt repayment on companies’ post-IPO survival. Furthermore, company survival was found to be consistently improved when they allocated less than 50% of their IPO proceeds, regardless of the purposes (growth, repay debt or general). These results highlight the importance of the intended use of IPO proceeds on the survival of newly listed companies, and provide insights for policymakers on the management of IPO proceeds for long-term survival.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Sarah Alyasa-Gan & Norliza Che-Yahya, 2022. "Intended Use of IPO Proceeds and Survival of Listed Companies in Malaysia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:145-:d:774475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/3/145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/3/145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garima Baluja & Balwinder Singh, 2016. "The survival analysis of initial public offerings in India," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 13(1), pages 23-41, May.
    2. Espenlaub, Susanne & Goyal, Abhinav & Mohamed, Abdulkadir, 2016. "Impact of legal institutions on IPO survival: A global perspective," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 98-112.
    3. Susanne Espenlaub & Arif Khurshed & Abdulkadir Mohamed, 2012. "IPO Survival in a Reputational Market," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3-4), pages 427-463, April.
    4. Kim, Woojin & Weisbach, Michael S., 2008. "Motivations for public equity offers: An international perspective," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 281-307, February.
    5. Helbing, Pia & Lucey, Brian M. & Vigne, Samuel A., 2019. "The determinants of IPO withdrawal – Evidence from Europe," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 415-436.
    6. Rahman, Siti Suhaila Abdul & Che-Yahya, Norliza, 2019. "Initial and long-term performance of IPOs. Does growth opportunity of issuing firm matter?," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 15(2).
    7. Andre Paul Lamberto & Subhrendu Rath, 2010. "The Survival Of Initial Public Offerings In Australia," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 133-147.
    8. Fan, Pengda, 2019. "Debt retirement at IPO and firm growth," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Zhang, Dongyang & Zheng, Wenping & Ning, Lutao, 2018. "Does innovation facilitate firm survival? Evidence from Chinese high-tech firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 458-468.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip Sinnadurai, 2022. "“Empirical Corporate Finance: Opportunities and Challenges”—Editorial Synthesis of the Special Issue," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-8, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iftikhar Ahmad & Izlin Ismail & Shahrin Saaid Shaharuddin, 2021. "Predictive Role of Ex Ante Strategic Firm Characteristics for Sustainable Initial Public Offering (IPO) Survival," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Duong, Huu Nhan & Goyal, Abhinav & Kallinterakis, Vasileios & Veeraraghavan, Madhu, 2021. "Market manipulation rules and IPO underpricing," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Didier, Tatiana & Levine, Ross & Llovet Montanes, Ruth & Schmukler, Sergio L., 2021. "Capital market financing and firm growth," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Shima Amini & Sofia Johan & Eilnaz Kashefi Pour & Abdulkadir Mohamed, 2023. "Employee Welfare, Social Capital, and IPO Firm Survival," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2174-2204, November.
    5. Espenlaub, Susanne & Goyal, Abhinav & Mohamed, Abdulkadir, 2020. "The impact of shareholders and creditors rights on IPO performance: An international study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    6. Reiff, Annika & Tykvová, Tereza, 2021. "IPO withdrawals: Are corporate governance and VC characteristics the guiding light in the rough sea of volatile markets?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Yuji Honjo & Koki Kurihara, 2023. "Graduation of initial public offering firms from junior stock markets: evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 813-841, February.
    8. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Arleta A. A. Majoch & Xiao Y. Zhou, 2021. "Does an Asset Owner’s Institutional Setting Influence Its Decision to Sign the Principles for Responsible Investment?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 389-414, January.
    9. Wolfgang Bessler & Johannes Beyenbach & Marc Steffen Rapp & Marco Vendrasco, 2023. "Why do firms down-list or exit from securities markets?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1175-1211, May.
    10. Wasim Ahmad & Ranko Jelic, 2014. "Lockup Agreements and Survival of UK IPOs," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5-6), pages 717-742, June.
    11. Anup Banerjee & Mattias Nordqvist & Karin Hellerstedt, 2020. "The role of the board chair—A literature review and suggestions for future research," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 372-405, November.
    12. Ferdinand Thies & Sören Wallbach & Michael Wessel & Markus Besler & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Initial coin offerings and the cryptocurrency hype - the moderating role of exogenous and endogenous signals," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1691-1705, September.
    13. Paul B. McGuinness, 2024. "Research note: An investigation of the relation between pre-IPO dividends and vendor sales," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 889-910, April.
    14. Z. Jun Lin & Shengqiang Liu & Fangcheng Sun, 2017. "The Impact of Financing Constraints and Agency Costs on Corporate R&D Investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 3-42, March.
    15. Calomiris, Charles W. & Larrain, Mauricio & Schmukler, Sergio L., 2021. "Capital inflows, equity issuance activity, and corporate investment," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    16. Fan, Pengda, 2019. "Debt retirement at IPO and firm growth," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-16.
    17. Yang, Bao & Chou, Hsin-I. & Zhao, Jing, 2020. "Innovation or dividend payout: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 180-203.
    18. DeAngelo, Harry & DeAngelo, Linda & Stulz, René M., 2010. "Seasoned equity offerings, market timing, and the corporate lifecycle," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 275-295, March.
    19. Takahashi, Hidenori & Yamada, Kazuo, 2015. "IPOs, growth, and the impact of relaxing listing requirements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 505-519.
    20. Kashefi Pour, Eilnaz & Lasfer, Meziane, 2013. "Why do companies delist voluntarily from the stock market?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 4850-4860.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:145-:d:774475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.