IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v13y2020i11p280-d444515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Application for the Goal Programming—The Target Decision Rule for Uncertain Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Gaspars-Wieloch

    (Department of Operations Research and Mathematical Economics, Institute of Informatics and Quantitative Economics, Poznan University of Economics and Business, 61-875 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The goal programming (GP) is a well-known approach applied to multi-criteria decision making (M-DM). It has been used in many domains and the literature offers diverse extensions of this procedure. On the other hand, so far, some evident analogies between M-DM under certainty and scenario-based one-criterion decision making under uncertainty (1-DMU) have not been revealed in the literature. These similarities give the possibility to adjust the goal programming to an entirely new domain. The purpose of the paper is to create a novel method for uncertain problems on the basis of the GP ideas. In order to achieve this aim we carefully examine the analogies occurring between the structures of both issues (M-DM and 1-DMU). We also analyze some differences resulting from a different interpretation of the data. By analogy to the goal programming, four hybrids for 1-DMU are formulated. They differ from each other in terms of the type of the decision maker considered (pessimist, optimist, moderate). The new decision rule may be helpful when solving uncertain problems since it is especially designed for neutral criteria, which are not taken into account in existing procedures developed for 1-DMU.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2020. "A New Application for the Goal Programming—The Target Decision Rule for Uncertain Problems," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:280-:d:444515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/11/280/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/11/280/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parinaz Aliasghari & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Mehdi Abapour & Ali Ahmadian & Ali Elkamel, 2020. "Goal Programming Application for Contract Pricing of Electric Vehicle Aggregator in Join Day-Ahead Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Leandro Maciel & Rosangela Ballini & Fernando Gomide, 2018. "Evolving fuzzy modelling for yield curve forecasting," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 290-311.
    3. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper & R. O. Ferguson, 1955. "Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 138-151, January.
    4. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    5. Alexey Evgenievich Cherepovitsyn & Alina Alexandrovna Ilinova, 2018. "Methods and Tools of Scenario Planning in Areas of Natural Resources Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 434-446.
    6. Gilboa,Itzhak, 2009. "Theory of Decision under Uncertainty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521517324.
    7. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Anjali Singh & Anjana Gupta & Aparna Mehra, 2020. "Matrix games with 2-tuple linguistic information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(2), pages 895-910, April.
    9. Catalin Angelo Ioan & Gina Ioan, 2011. "A A method of choice of the best alternative in the multiple solutions case in the Games Theory," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1, pages 5-8, May.
    10. Durbach, Ian N., 2014. "Outranking under uncertainty using scenarios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 98-108.
    11. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:174-180 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Stewart, Theodor J. & French, Simon & Rios, Jesus, 2013. "Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 679-688.
    13. W. Allen Spivey & Hirokuni Tamura, 1970. "Goal programming in econometrics," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 183-192, June.
    14. Hayashi, Takashi, 2008. "Regret aversion and opportunity dependence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 242-268, March.
    15. Vrat, Prem & Kriengkrairut, Charoen, 1986. "A goal programming model for project crashing with piecewise linear time-cost trade-off," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 161-172, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zishuo Huang & Yingfang Liu & Jing Gao & Zhenwei Peng, 2022. "Approach for Village Carbon Emissions Index and Planning Strategies Generation Based on Two-Stage Optimization Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2023. "Scenario planning as a new application area for TOPSIS," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(2), pages 23-34.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2017. "Newsvendor problem under complete uncertainty: a case of innovative products," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(3), pages 561-585, September.
    2. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica, 2016. "A model based on Copula Theory for sustainable and social responsible investments," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 55-76.
    3. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2019. "Project Net Present Value estimation under uncertainty," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 179-197, March.
    4. Itzhak Gilboa & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler, 2019. "What are axiomatizations good for?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 339-359, May.
    5. Tetenov, Aleksey, 2012. "Statistical treatment choice based on asymmetric minimax regret criteria," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 157-165.
    6. Basieva, Irina & Khrennikova, Polina & Pothos, Emmanuel M. & Asano, Masanari & Khrennikov, Andrei, 2018. "Quantum-like model of subjective expected utility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 150-162.
    7. Barnett, William A. & Han, Qing & Zhang, Jianbo, 2021. "Monetary services aggregation under uncertainty: A behavioral economics extension using Choquet expectation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 437-447.
    8. Bond, Craig A. & Iverson, Terrence, 2011. "Modeling Information in Environmental Decision-Making," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17.
    9. Denis Bouyssou & Thierry Marchant, 2011. "Subjective expected utility without preferences," Post-Print hal-02359811, HAL.
    10. Shuying Li & Guoping Tu, 2022. "Probabilistic Linguistic Matrix Game Based on Fuzzy Envelope and Prospect Theory with Its Application," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Eddie Dekel & Barton L. Lipman, 2010. "How (Not) to Do Decision Theory," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 257-282, September.
    12. Santiago I. Sautua, 2016. "Does Uncertainty Cause Inertia In Decision Making? An Experimental Study Of The Role Of Regret Aversion And Indecisiveness," Documentos de Trabajo 14587, Universidad del Rosario.
    13. Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Kokot, Johanna & Vomhof, Markus & Weßling, Jens, 2017. "Health insurance choice and risk preferences under cumulative prospect theory – an experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 374-397.
    14. Ali al-Nowaihi & Sanjit Dhami & Mengxing Wei, 2018. "Quantum Decision Theory and the Ellsberg Paradox," CESifo Working Paper Series 7158, CESifo.
    15. Ali al-Nowaihi & Sanjit Dhami, 2016. "The Ellsberg paradox: A challenge to quantum decision theory?," Discussion Papers in Economics 16/08, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    16. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2018. "The Impact of the Structure of the Payoff Matrix on the Final Decision made Under Uncertainty," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(01), pages 1-27, February.
    17. Herweg, Fabian & Müller, Daniel, 2021. "A comparison of regret theory and salience theory for decisions under risk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Aldo Montesano, 2019. "On some aspects of decision theory under uncertainty: rationality, price-probabilities and the Dutch book argument," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 57-85, July.
    19. Florian Schneider & Martin Schonger, 2015. "An experimental test of the Anscombe-Aumann Monotonicity axiom," ECON - Working Papers 207, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised May 2017.
    20. Aldo Montesano, 2022. "On the economic foundations of decision theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 563-583, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:13:y:2020:i:11:p:280-:d:444515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.