IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v8y2020i4p77-d454494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fractional Step Method versus the Radial Basis Functions for Option Pricing with Correlated Stochastic Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Yusho Kagraoka

    (Faculty of Economics, Musashi University, Tokyo 176-8534, Japan)

Abstract

In option pricing models with correlated stochastic processes, an option premium is commonly a solution to a partial differential equation (PDE) with mixed derivatives in more than two space dimensions. Alternating direction implicit (ADI) finite difference methods are popular for solving a PDE with more than two space dimensions; however, it is not straightforward to employ the ADI method for solving a PDE with mixed derivatives. The aim of this study is to find out which numerical method would be appropriate to solve PDEs with mixed derivatives based on the accuracy of the solutions and the computation time. This study applies the fractional step method and the radial basis functions to solve a PDE with a mixed derivative, and investigates the efficiency of these numerical methods. Numerical experiments are conducted by applying these methods to exchange option pricing; exchange options are selected because the exchange option premium has an analytical form. The numerical results show that the both methods calculate premiums with high accuracy in the presence of mixed derivatives. The fractional step method calculates the option premium more accurately and much faster than the radial basis functions. Therefore, from the numerical experiments, this study concludes that the fractional step method is more appropriate than the radial basis functions for solving a PDE with a mixed derivative.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusho Kagraoka, 2020. "The Fractional Step Method versus the Radial Basis Functions for Option Pricing with Correlated Stochastic Processes," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:77-:d:454494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/8/4/77/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/8/4/77/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raymond Brummelhuis & Ron T. L. Chan, 2014. "A Radial Basis Function Scheme for Option Pricing in Exponential Lévy Models," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 238-269, July.
    2. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    3. David Heath & Robert Jarrow & Andrew Morton, 2008. "Bond Pricing And The Term Structure Of Interest Rates: A New Methodology For Contingent Claims Valuation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financial Derivatives Pricing Selected Works of Robert Jarrow, chapter 13, pages 277-305, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Ballestra, Luca Vincenzo & Pacelli, Graziella, 2013. "Pricing European and American options with two stochastic factors: A highly efficient radial basis function approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 1142-1167.
    5. Ron Tat Lung Chan, 2016. "Adaptive Radial Basis Function Methods for Pricing Options Under Jump-Diffusion Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 623-643, April.
    6. Kaushik I. Amin & Robert A. Jarrow, 1992. "Pricing Options On Risky Assets In A Stochastic Interest Rate Economy1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(4), pages 217-237, October.
    7. Reza Mollapourasl & Ali Fereshtian & Michèle Vanmaele, 2019. "Radial Basis Functions with Partition of Unity Method for American Options with Stochastic Volatility," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 259-287, January.
    8. Margrabe, William, 1978. "The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 177-186, March.
    9. Ron Chan & Simon Hubbert, 2014. "Options pricing under the one-dimensional jump-diffusion model using the radial basis function interpolation scheme," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 161-189, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    2. Matteo Gardini & Piergiacomo Sabino & Emanuela Sasso, 2020. "Correlating L\'evy processes with Self-Decomposability: Applications to Energy Markets," Papers 2004.04048, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    3. M. Khasi & J. Rashidinia, 2024. "A Bilinear Pseudo-spectral Method for Solving Two-asset European and American Pricing Options," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(2), pages 893-918, February.
    4. Mondher Bellalah, 2009. "Derivatives, Risk Management & Value," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 7175, January.
    5. Carl Chiarella & Xue-Zhong He & Christina Sklibosios Nikitopoulos, 2015. "Derivative Security Pricing," Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-662-45906-5, July-Dece.
    6. Ravi Kashyap, 2022. "Options as Silver Bullets: Valuation of Term Loans, Inventory Management, Emissions Trading and Insurance Risk Mitigation using Option Theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1175-1215, August.
    7. Naoto Kunitomo & Yong‐Jin Kim, 2007. "Effects Of Stochastic Interest Rates And Volatility On Contingent Claims," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 58(1), pages 71-106, March.
    8. John Crosby, 2008. "Pricing a class of exotic commodity options in a multi-factor jump-diffusion model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(5), pages 471-483.
    9. Anna Maria Gambaro & Nicola Secomandi, 2021. "A Discussion of Non‐Gaussian Price Processes for Energy and Commodity Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 47-67, January.
    10. Naoto Kunitomo & Yong-Jin Kim, 2000. "Effects of Stochastic Interest Rates and Volatility on Contingent Claims," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-67, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    11. Gourieroux, C. & Monfort, A. & Sufana, R., 2010. "International money and stock market contingent claims," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1727-1751, December.
    12. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    13. Naoto Kunitomo & Yong-Jin Kim, 2001. "Effects of Stochastic Interest Rates and Volatility on Contingent Claims (Revised Version)," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-129, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    14. Chan, Tat Lung (Ron), 2019. "Efficient computation of european option prices and their sensitivities with the complex fourier series method," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    15. Sanjay K. Nawalkha & Xiaoyang Zhuo, 2022. "A Theory of Equivalent Expectation Measures for Contingent Claim Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(5), pages 2853-2906, October.
    16. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    17. Kozpınar, Sinem & Uzunca, Murat & Karasözen, Bülent, 2020. "Pricing European and American options under Heston model using discontinuous Galerkin finite elements," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 568-587.
    18. Chiarella, Carl & Kang, Boda & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Tô, Thuy-Duong, 2013. "Humps in the volatility structure of the crude oil futures market: New evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 989-1000.
    19. René Garcia & Richard Luger & Eric Renault, 2000. "Asymmetric Smiles, Leverage Effects and Structural Parameters," Working Papers 2000-57, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    20. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:8:y:2020:i:4:p:77-:d:454494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.