IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v8y2020i3p44-d385139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Price Criteria for the Evaluation of the Tender Offers in Public Procurement of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Baranovsky

    (Faculty of Banking Technology and Business, University of Banking, 04070 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Nataliia Tkachenko

    (Faculty of Banking Technology and Business, University of Banking, 04070 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Vladimer Glonti

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, 6010 Batumi, Georgia)

  • Valentyna Levchenko

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, 01011 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Kateryna Bogatyrova

    (Faculty of Trade and Marketing, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, 02156 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Zaza Beridze

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, 6010 Batumi, Georgia)

  • Larisa Belinskaja

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Iryna Zelenitsa

    (Faculty of International Trade and Law, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, 02156 Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Traditionally, public procurement has been associated with the measurement of achieving savings. However, recent research shows that the economic impact of public procurement is not limited only to savings, but by measuring the impact of four capitals—natural, human, social, and economic—on sustainable well-being over time. Ukraine is a country with a very low gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, which exacerbates the problem of the impact of public procurement results on the population’s welfare. Ukrainian public procurement legislation allows customers to apply non-price criteria (the share of non-price criteria cannot be more than 70%), which, together, are taken into account in the formula of the quoted price. The studies show that the effect of the use of non-price criteria depends on the relevance of the method of the evaluation of non-price criteria. The most important non-price criteria for Ukrainian customers by product categories and the methods of their evaluation are analyzed according to the Bi.prozorro.org analytics module. Therefore, it is concluded that the quoted price method, which is used in Ukrainian practice, is not relevant in comparison with the method used in the EU. A survey of the government buyers on the practice of applying non-price criteria was conducted, and the areas of their use were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Baranovsky & Nataliia Tkachenko & Vladimer Glonti & Valentyna Levchenko & Kateryna Bogatyrova & Zaza Beridze & Larisa Belinskaja & Iryna Zelenitsa, 2020. "Non-Price Criteria for the Evaluation of the Tender Offers in Public Procurement of Ukraine," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:44-:d:385139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/8/3/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/8/3/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramon Bernal & Leire San-Jose & Jose Luis Retolaza, 2019. "Improvement Actions for a More Social and Sustainable Public Procurement: A Delphi Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Ivashova, Ljudmyla & Ivashov, Mykhailo, 2019. "Ukrainian Realities And The World Experience Of Fighting Corruption In The Field Of Public Procurement," Public Administration and Regional Development, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, issue 4, pages 316-343.
    3. Guzel Kh. Pyrkova* & Gulnara N. Kaigorodova & Alfiya A. Mustafina & Darya P. Alyakina, 2018. "Financial Risks: Methodological Approaches and Management Methods," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 122-127:5.
    4. Gulnara Kaigorodova & Daria Alyakina & Guzel Pyrkova & Alfiya Mustafina, 2018. "Investment Activity of Insurers and the State Economic Growth," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 109-123.
    5. Charles Edquist & Nicholas S Vonortas & Jon M Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Jakob Edler (ed.), 2015. "Public Procurement for Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15642.
    6. Walker, Helen & Brammer, Stephen, 2012. "The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 256-268.
    7. Feihu Hu & Xuan Feng & Hui Cao, 2018. "A Short-Term Decision Model for Electricity Retailers: Electricity Procurement and Time-of-Use Pricing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Gabriel Jobidon & Pierre Lemieux & Robert Beauregard, 2018. "Implementation of Integrated Project Delivery in Quebec’s Procurement for Public Infrastructure: A Comparative and Relational Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, July.
    9. Simona Činčalová & Veronika Hedija, 2020. "Firm Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of Czech Transportation and Storage Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Kelei Xue & Ya Xu & Lipan Feng, 2018. "Managing Procurement for a Firm with Two Ordering Opportunities under Supply Disruption Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-32, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladyslav Sotnyk & Artem Kupchyn & Viktor Trynchuk & Vladimer Glonti & Larisa Belinskaja, 2022. "Fuzzy Logic Decision-Making Model for Technology Foresight," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 139-159.
    2. Igor Britchenko & Oksana Polinkevych & Viktor Trynchuk & Inna Khovrak, 2023. "The Impact of COVID-19 on the Philosophy of Doing Business in a Sustainable Environment," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 100-116.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katriina Alhola & Sven‐ Olof Ryding & Hanna Salmenperä & Niels Juul Busch, 2019. "Exploiting the Potential of Public Procurement: Opportunities for Circular Economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 96-109, February.
    2. Jeongae You & Woosuk Kim & Hyun-Suk Lee & Minjung Kwon, 2021. "Best Content Standards in Sports Career Education for Adolescents: A Delphi Survey of Korean Professional Views," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    4. Edquist , Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia , Jon Mikel, 2015. "The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: The Case of Sweden – not the innovation leader of the EU – updated version," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/27, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    5. Catanzaro, Daniele & Pesenti, Raffaele & Ronco, Roberto, 2023. "Job scheduling under Time-of-Use energy tariffs for sustainable manufacturing: a survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1091-1109.
    6. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    7. Zhang, Yang & Yang, Qingyu & Li, Donghe & An, Dou, 2022. "A reinforcement and imitation learning method for pricing strategy of electricity retailer with customers’ flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    8. Javier Mendoza Jiménez & Montserrat Hernández López & Susana Eva Franco Escobar, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: From Law to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    9. James Adu Peprah & Samuel Brako & Noah Boakye Akosah, 2018. "The Awareness Level of Green Procurement at the District Assemblies in Western Region in Ghana," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 46-58, March.
    10. Taiwen Feng & Hongyan Sheng, 2023. "Identifying the equifinal configurations of prompting green supply chain integration and subsequent performance outcome," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5234-5251, December.
    11. Barbara Orser & Allan Riding & Julie Weeks, 2019. "The efficacy of gender-based federal procurement policies in the United States," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 491-515, August.
    12. Paolo Castelnuovo & Stefano Clo & Massimo Florio, 2021. "Space policy drives innovation through technological procurement: evidence from Italy," Working Papers - Economics wp2021_08.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    13. Castelnovo, Paolo & Florio, Massimo & Forte, Stefano & Rossi, Lucio & Sirtori, Emanuela, 2018. "The economic impact of technological procurement for large-scale research infrastructures: Evidence from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1853-1867.
    14. Paula Cayolla Trindade & Paula Antunes & Paulo Partidário, 2017. "SPP Toolbox: Supporting Sustainable Public Procurement in the Context of Socio-Technical Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, December.
    15. N. Sirotkina G. & НАДЕЖДА Сироткина ГЕННАДЬЕВНА, 2017. "Реализация инновационного потенциала государственных закупок в России // Innovative Potential Implementation of Public Procurement in Russia," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 7(3), pages 59-67.
    16. Tammi, Timo & Saastamoinen, Jani & Reijonen, Helen, 2020. "Public procurement as a vehicle of innovation – What does the inverted-U relationship between competition and innovativeness tell us?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Stefan Kuhlmann & Arie Rip, 2018. "Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 448-454.
    18. Gabriel Jobidon & Pierre Lemieux & Robert Beauregard, 2019. "Comparison of Quebec’s Project Delivery Methods: Relational Contract Law and Differences in Contractual Language," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-75, April.
    19. Laura Treviño-Lozano, 2022. "Framing Social Sustainability in Infrastructure Theory and Practice: A Review of Two Road Projects in Mexico from a Business and Human Rights Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Larraitz Lazkano & Ana Beraza, 2019. "Social Accounting for Sustainability: A Study in the Social Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:44-:d:385139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.