IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v9y2012i7p2362-2377d18655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Perception and Occupational Accidents: A Study of Gas Station Workers in Southern Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz

    (School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil)

  • Laurelize Pereira Rocha

    (School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil)

  • Clarice Alves Bonow

    (School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil)

  • Mara Regina Santos Da Silva

    (School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil)

  • Joana Cezar Vaz

    (School of Chemistry and Food, Oil Refinery Riograndense, 96202-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil)

  • Letícia Silveira Cardoso

    (School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil)

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify the perceptions of gas station workers about physical, chemical, biological and physiological risk factors to which they are exposed in their work environment; identify types of occupational accidents involving gas station workers and; report the development of a socioenvironmental intervention as a tool for risk communication to gas station workers. A quantitative study was performed with 221 gas station workers in southern Brazil between October and December 2010. Data collection was performed between October to December 2010 via structured interviews. The data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0. The participants identified the following risk types: chemical (93.7%), physical (88.2%), physiological (64.3%) and biological (62.4%). In this sample, 94.1% of gas station workers reported occupational accidents, and 74.2% reported fuel contact with the eyes ( p

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz & Laurelize Pereira Rocha & Clarice Alves Bonow & Mara Regina Santos Da Silva & Joana Cezar Vaz & Letícia Silveira Cardoso, 2012. "Risk Perception and Occupational Accidents: A Study of Gas Station Workers in Southern Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:7:p:2362-2377:d:18655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/7/2362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/7/2362/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Barnett & Glynis M. Breakwell, 2001. "Risk Perception and Experience: Hazard Personality Profiles and Individual Differences," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 171-178, February.
    2. Thomas Leoni, 2010. "What drives the perception of health and safety risks in the workplace? Evidence from European labour markets," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 37(2), pages 165-195, May.
    3. Hayes, Michael V., 1992. "On the epistemology of risk: Language, logic and social science," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 401-407, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Mohsin & Hengbin Yin & Weilun Huang & Shijun Zhang & Luyao Zhang & Ana Mehak, 2022. "Evaluation of Occupational Health Risk Management and Performance in China: A Case Study of Gas Station Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Chen, Yinuo & Tian, Zhigang & He, Rui & Wang, Yifei & Xie, Shuyi, 2023. "Discovery of potential risks for the gas transmission station using monitoring data and the OOBN method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz & Daiani Modernel Xavier & Clarice Alves Bonow & Joana Cezar Vaz & Letícia Silveira Cardoso & Cynthia Fontella Sant’Anna & Valdecir Zavarese da Costa & Carlos Henrique Cardona N, 2022. "Occupational Well-Being of Multidisciplinary PHC Teams: Barriers/Facilitators and Negotiations to Improve Working Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Clarice Alves Bonow & Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz & Marlise Capa Verde de Almeida & Laurelize Pereira Rocha & Anelise Miritz Borges & Diéssica Roggia Piexak & Joana Cezar Vaz, 2013. "Risk Perception and Risk Communication for Training Women Apprentice Welders: A Challenge for Public Health Nursing," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-11, October.
    3. Sisira S. Withanachchi & Ilia Kunchulia & Giorgi Ghambashidze & Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2018. "Farmers’ Perception of Water Quality and Risks in the Mashavera River Basin, Georgia: Analyzing the Vulnerability of the Social-Ecological System through Community Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Loredana Antronico & Roberto Coscarelli & Francesco De Pascale & Giovanni Gull?, 2018. "La comunicazione del rischio e la percezione pubblica dei disastri: il caso studio della frana di Maierato (Calabria, Italia)," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 9-29.
    5. Nicolás C. Bronfman & Luis Abdón Cifuentes & Michael L. deKay & Henry H. Willis, 2007. "Accounting for Variation in the Explanatory Power of the Psychometric Paradigm: The Effects of Aggregation and Focus," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 527-554, June.
    6. Henry H. Willis & Michael L. DeKay & Baruch Fischhoff & M. Granger Morgan, 2005. "Aggregate, Disaggregate, and Hybrid Analyses of Ecological Risk Perceptions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 405-428, April.
    7. Kevin Fox Gotham & Richard Campanella & Katie Lauve‐Moon & Bradford Powers, 2018. "Hazard Experience, Geophysical Vulnerability, and Flood Risk Perceptions in a Postdisaster City, the Case of New Orleans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 345-356, February.
    8. Donna Brown & Jonathan Wadsworth, 2022. "Accidents will happen: (de)regulation of health and safety legislation, workplace accidents and self employment," CEP Discussion Papers dp1855, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    9. Mei‐Chih Meg Tseng & Yi‐Ping Lin & Fu‐Chang Hu & Tsun‐Jen Cheng, 2013. "Risks Perception of Electromagnetic Fields in Taiwan: The Influence of Psychopathology and the Degree of Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2002-2012, November.
    10. Christine Mayrhuber & Gerhard Rünstler & Thomas Url & Werner Eichhorst & Michael J. Kendzia & Maarten Gerard & Connie Nielsen, 2011. "Pension Systems in the EU. Contingent Liabilities and Assets in the Public and Private Sector," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 43938, April.
    11. Sachse, Katharina & Jungermann, Helmut & Belting, Julia M., 2012. "Investment risk – The perspective of individual investors," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 437-447.
    12. Angelo Panno & Annalisa Theodorou & Giuseppe Alessio Carbone & Evelina De Longis & Chiara Massullo & Gianluca Cepale & Giuseppe Carrus & Claudio Imperatori & Giovanni Sanesi, 2021. "Go Greener, Less Risk: Access to Nature Is Associated with Lower Risk Taking in Different Domains during the COVID-19 Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Claudia Freivogel & Vivianne H. M. Visschers, 2020. "Understanding the Underlying Psychosocial Determinants of Safe Food Handling among Consumers to Mitigate the Transmission Risk of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Md Mostafizur Rahman & Irtifa Alam Nabila & Mohammed Sadman Sakib & Nusrat Jahan Silvia & Muhammad Abdullahil Galib & Ifta Alam Shobuj & Lamia Hasan & Musabber Ali Chisty & Farzana Rahman & Abu Reza M, 2022. "Status and Individual View toward Lightning among University Students of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Marion de Vries & Liesbeth Claassen & Marcel Mennen & Aura Timen & Margreet J. M. te Wierik & Danielle R. M. Timmermans, 2019. "Public Perceptions of Contentious Risk: The Case of Rubber Granulate in the Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Wim Kellens & Ruud Zaalberg & Tijs Neutens & Wouter Vanneuville & Philippe De Maeyer, 2011. "An Analysis of the Public Perception of Flood Risk on the Belgian Coast," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(7), pages 1055-1068, July.
    17. Ling Tian & Peng Yao & Shi-jie Jiang, 2014. "Perception of earthquake risk: a study of the earthquake insurance pilot area in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1595-1611, December.
    18. Agathe Backer‐Grøndahl & Aslak Fyhri & Pål Ulleberg & Astrid Helene Amundsen, 2009. "Accidents and Unpleasant Incidents: Worry in Transport and Prediction of Travel Behavior," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9), pages 1217-1226, September.
    19. Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz & Clarice Alves Bonow & Joana Cezar Vaz, 2015. "Risk Communication Concerning Welding Fumes for the Primary Preventive Care of Welding Apprentices in Southern Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Gudrun Biffl & Anna Faustmann & Doris Gabriel & Thomas Leoni & Christine Mayrhuber & Eva Rückert, 2012. "Psychische Belastungen der Arbeit und ihre Folgen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 44034, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:7:p:2362-2377:d:18655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.