IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13561-d947563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Amy K. Otto

    (University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
    Co-first authors.)

  • Dana Ketcher

    (University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
    Co-first authors.)

  • Maija Reblin

    (College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Alexandra L. Terrill

    (Department of Occupational & Recreational Therapies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

Abstract

Objective: Positive psychology approaches (PPAs) to interventions focus on developing positive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Benefits of these interventions may be compounded when delivered to interdependent dyads. However, dyadic interventions involving PPAs are relatively new in the cancer context. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the available research evidence for use of dyadic PPA-based interventions in cancer and identify gaps in this literature. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of intervention studies that included PPAs delivered to both members of an adult dyad including a cancer patient and support person (e.g., family caregiver, intimate partner). Results: Forty-eight studies, including 39 primary analyses and 28 unique interventions, were included. Most often (53.8%), the support person in the dyad was broadly defined as a “caregiver”; the most frequent specifically-defined role was spouse (41.0%). PPAs (e.g., meaning making) were often paired with other intervention components (e.g., education). Outcomes were mostly individual well-being or dyadic coping/adjustment. Conclusions: Wide variability exists in PPA type/function and their targeted outcomes. More work is needed to refine the definition/terminology and understand specific mechanisms of positive psychology approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy K. Otto & Dana Ketcher & Maija Reblin & Alexandra L. Terrill, 2022. "Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13561-:d:947563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafael del-Pino-Casado & Antonio Frías-Osuna & Pedro A Palomino-Moral & María Ruzafa-Martínez & Antonio J Ramos-Morcillo, 2018. "Social support and subjective burden in caregivers of adults and older adults: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longobardo, Luz María Peña & Rodríguez-Sánchez, Beatriz & Oliva, Juan, 2023. "Does becoming an informal caregiver make your health worse? A longitudinal analysis across Europe," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    2. Doris Y. P. Leung & Helen Y. L. Chan & Patrick K. C. Chiu & Raymond S. K. Lo & Larry L. Y. Lee, 2020. "Source of Social Support and Caregiving Self-Efficacy on Caregiver Burden and Patient’s Quality of Life: A Path Analysis on Patients with Palliative Care Needs and Their Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Maija Reblin & Djin L. Tay & Eli Iacob & Kristin G. Cloyes & Megan C. Thomas Hebdon & Lee Ellington, 2023. "Hospice Caregivers’ Perception of Family and Non-Family Social Support and Stress over Time: Associations with Reports of General Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-9, March.
    4. Rafael del-Pino-Casado & Marta Rodríguez Cardosa & Catalina López-Martínez & Vasiliki Orgeta, 2019. "The association between subjective caregiver burden and depressive symptoms in carers of older relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Rosario Fernández-Peña & José Luis Molina & Oliver Valero, 2020. "Satisfaction with Social Support Received from Social Relationships in Cases of Chronic Pain: The Influence of Personal Network Characteristics in Terms of Structure, Composition and Functional Conten," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. María Nieves Rodríguez-Madrid & María del Río-Lozano & Rosario Fernández-Peña & María del Mar García-Calvente, 2021. "Changes in Caregiver Personal Support Networks: Gender Differences and Effects on Health (CUIDAR-SE Study)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Yossie Susanti Eka Putri & I Gusti Ngurah Edi Putra & Annida Falahaini & Ice Yulia Wardani, 2022. "Factors Associated with Caregiver Burden in Caregivers of Older Patients with Dementia in Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Laura Muñoz-Bermejo & José Carmelo Adsuar & Salvador Postigo-Mota & Inés Casado-Verdejo & Claudia Mara de Melo-Tavares & Miguel Ángel Garcia-Gordillo & Jorge Pérez-Gómez & Jorge Carlos-Vivas, 2020. "Relationship of Perceived Social Support with Mental Health in Older Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Vânia Lídia Soares & Sara Lemos & Maria do Céu Barbieri-Figueiredo & Maria Carminda Soares Morais & Carlos Sequeira, 2023. "Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Tatjana Rajovic & Natasa Todorovic & Milutin Vracevic & Nina Rajovic & Andrija Pavlovic & Vedrana Pavlovic & Igor Grbic & Rosa Sapic & Slavica Krsmanovic & Marijana Vukmirovic & Tamara Stanisavljevic , 2021. "From Burden to Depressive Symptoms in Informal Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Path Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Emma Armstrong-Carter & A. T. Panter & Bryant Hutson & Elizabeth A. Olson, 2022. "A university-wide survey of caregiving students in the US: Individual differences and associations with emotional and academic adjustment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Leticia García-Mochón & Luz María Peña-Longobardo & María del Río-Lozano & Juan Oliva-Moreno & Isabel Larrañaga-Padilla & María del Mar García-Calvente, 2019. "Determinants of Burden and Satisfaction in Informal Caregivers: Two Sides of the Same Coin? The CUIDAR-SE Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13561-:d:947563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.