IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13161-d940768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compliance Checks Decrease Cigarette Sales Rates to Pseudo-Underaged Mystery Shoppers: A Quasi-Experimental Control Group Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kristin Feltmann

    (STAD (Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Johanna Gripenberg

    (STAD (Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Tobias H. Elgán

    (STAD (Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

To control adherence to age limits regarding sales of tobacco products, Swedish authorities can conduct compliance checks. Compliance checks involve prior information to all retailers, mystery shopping, and subsequent feedback to the retailers. This study investigated whether compliance checks can decrease the rates of cigarette sales to underaged adolescents. Test purchases of cigarettes were conducted using pseudo-underaged mystery shoppers, i.e., 18-year-old adolescents with a younger appearance not carrying ID, to measure the refusal rate and rate of ID checks. Test purchases were conducted at 257 retail outlets in 13 municipalities in Stockholm County at baseline 2017 and follow-up 2019, respectively. In between the measurements, six municipalities (intervention area) conducted compliance checks, and seven municipalities were used as a comparison. Comparing baseline and follow-up, rates of refusal (70.4 to 95.8%) and ID checks (80.3 to 95.8%) improved in the intervention area. In the comparison area, refusal rates increased (80.9 to 85.2%), and ID check rates remained stable (at 86.1%). Significant group × time interaction effects reveal that the rates of refusal and ID checks differently changed in the study areas over time. These results indicate that compliance checks are an effective method to decrease cigarette sales to underaged adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristin Feltmann & Johanna Gripenberg & Tobias H. Elgán, 2022. "Compliance Checks Decrease Cigarette Sales Rates to Pseudo-Underaged Mystery Shoppers: A Quasi-Experimental Control Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13161-:d:940768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Health Organization, 2020. "Summary results of the global youth tobacco survey in selected countries of the WHO European Region (2020)," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt6nd8n6vh, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    2. Meier, Armando N. & Odermatt, Reto & Stutzer, Alois, 2021. "Tobacco sales prohibition and teen smoking," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 998-1014.
    3. Forster, J.L. & Murray, D.M. & Wolfson, M. & Blaine, T.M. & Wagenaar, A.C. & Hennrikus, D.J., 1998. "The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(8), pages 1193-1198.
    4. Christian Ben Lakhdar & Xavier Elharrar & K. Gallopel-Morvan & F.-C. Wolff, 2020. "Tobacco sales to underage buyers in France: findings from a mystery shopping study," Post-Print hal-02921361, HAL.
    5. Altman, D.G. & Rasenick-Douss, L. & Foster, V. & Tye, J.B., 1991. "Sustained effects of an educational program to reduce sales of cigarettes to minors," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(7), pages 891-893.
    6. Altman, David G. & Wheelis, Anne Y. & McFarlane, Mary & Lee, Hye-Ryeon & Fortmann, Stephen P., 1999. "The relationship between tobacco access and use among adolescents: a four community study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 759-775, March.
    7. Mariàngels Duch & Elena Gervilla & Montse Juan & Clarisse Guimarães & Maite Kefauver & Tobias H. Elgán & Johanna Gripenberg & Zara Quigg, 2020. "Effectiveness of a Community-Based Intervention to Increase Supermarket Vendors’ Compliance with Age Restrictions for Alcohol Sales in Spain: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Nordstrom, B.L. & Kinnunen, T. & Utman, C.H. & Krall, E.A. & Vokonas, P.S. & Garvey, A.J., 2000. "Predictors of continued smoking over 25 years of follow-up in the normative aging study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(3), pages 404-406.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gautam, Jeny & Glover, Marewa & Scragg, Robert & Bullen, Chris & Gentles, Dudley & Nosa, Vili & McCool, Judith, 2014. "Parental and retail supply of tobacco to minors: Findings from a community-based social supply intervention study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 120-127.
    2. Jason, Leonard A. & Pokorny, Steven B. & Adams, Monica, 2008. "A randomized trial evaluating tobacco possession-use-purchase laws in the USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1700-1707, December.
    3. Jonathan L. Blitstein & David M. Murray & Peter J. Hannan & William R. Shadish, 2005. "Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Future Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 268-286, June.
    4. Savage, Michael, 2017. "Do youth access control policies stop young people smoking? Evidence from Ireland," Papers WP572, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    5. Jonathan L. Blitstein & Peter J. Hannan & David M. Murray & William R. Shadish, 2005. "Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Existing Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 241-267, June.
    6. Kan, Ming-yue & Lau, Maggie, 2010. "Minor access control of Hong Kong under the framework convention on tobacco control," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(2-3), pages 204-210, May.
    7. Leonard A. Jason & Steven B. Pokorny & Monica L. Adams & Annie Topliff & Courtney C. Harris & Yvonne Hunt, 2008. "Effects of Youth Tobacco Access and Possession Policy Interventions on Heavy Adolescent Smokers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Mark Wolfson & Heather Champion & Todd Rogers & Rebecca H. Neiberg & Dianne C. Barker & Jennifer W. Talton & Edward H. Ip & Ralph B. D'Agostino Jr & Maria T. Parries & Doug Easterling, 2011. "Evaluation of Free to Grow: Head Start Partnerships to Promote Substance-Free Communities," Evaluation Review, , vol. 35(2), pages 153-188, April.
    9. Getik, Demid & Meier, Armando N., 2020. "Peer Gender and Mental Health," Working papers 2020/15, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    10. Paweł Koczkodaj & Paloma Cuchi & Agata Ciuba & Elwira Gliwska & Armando Peruga, 2021. "Point of Sale Advertising and Promotion of Cigarettes, Electronic Cigarettes, and Heated Tobacco Products in Warsaw, Poland—A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Ahammer, Alexander & Bauernschuster, Stefan & Halla, Martin & Lachenmaier, Hannah, 2022. "Minimum legal drinking age and the social gradient in binge drinking," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Hana Ross & Frank J. Chaloupka, 2003. "The effect of cigarette prices on youth smoking," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(3), pages 217-230, March.
    13. Chaloupka, Frank J. & Wechsler, Henry, 1997. "Price, tobacco control policies and smoking among young adults," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 359-373, June.
    14. Kristin Feltmann & Johanna Gripenberg & Tobias H. Elgán, 2020. "Compliance to the Alcohol Law: Overserving to Obviously Intoxicated Visitors at Music Festivals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-6, November.
    15. Mohammad Nurul Azam & Mohammad Shahjahan & Mahbuba Yeasmin & Nasar U Ahmed, 2016. "Prevalence of Smokeless Tobacco among Low Socioeconomic Populations: A Cross-Sectional Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    16. David M. Murray & Jonathan L. Blitstein & Peter J. Hannan & William R. Shadish, 2012. "Increasing the Degrees of Freedom in Future Group Randomized Trials," Evaluation Review, , vol. 36(6), pages 430-448, December.
    17. Wakefield, Melanie A PhD & Chaloupka, Frank J. PhD, 1999. "Effectiveness of Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs in Reducing Teenage Smoking: A Review," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt46n6b9mv, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    18. Levy, David T. & Hyland, Andrew & Higbee, Cheryl & Remer, Lillian & Compton, Christine, 2007. "The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California: Results from the California Tobacco Policy Simulation Model," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 167-185, July.
    19. Arthur, Michael W. & Briney, John S. & Hawkins, J. David & Abbott, Robert D. & Brooke-Weiss, Blair L. & Catalano, Richard F., 2007. "Measuring risk and protection in communities using the Communities That Care Youth Survey," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 197-211, May.
    20. Ali Palali & Jan C. Ours, 2019. "The impact of tobacco control policies on smoking initiation in eleven European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(9), pages 1287-1301, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13161-:d:940768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.