IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i17p11081-d906478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formation Mechanism of a Coastal Zone Environment Collaborative Governance Relationship: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on fsQCA

Author

Listed:
  • Wanjuan Wang

    (Law School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Hongbo Gong

    (Law School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

The coastal zone is an area where terrestrial and marine ecosystems intersect. This region may be subject to outstanding environmental issues, as influenced by many stakeholders. Based on the framework of collaborative governance, the starting conditions for forming a coastal zone environment collaborative governance relationship are proposed as follows: coastal zone environment, balanced level of power and resources, superior-level government participation, and previous cooperation experience. The coastal environmental governance practices of 14 cities along the continental coastal zone of the East China Sea are selected as cases, in order to test the interactions between and influence mechanisms of the starting conditions. As qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), based on set theory and Boolean algebra, is a popular tool to explain complex collaboration situations in small-N cases; and as fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) allows for fine classification of the membership degree (where the condition can be allocated any number between 0 and 1), we use fsQCA to analyze the collaborative governance relationships. The results of the analysis demonstrate that three combination configurations promote the formation of medium–high intensity collaborative governance relationships: high balance level of power and resources × high previous cooperation experience, high pollution of coastal zone environment × high balance level of power and resources × low superior-level government participation, and high pollution of coastal zone environment × high superior-level government participation × high previous cooperation experience. Based on this conclusion, we determine three types of relationship formation modes: wheel-, echo state network-, and umbrella-shaped modes. Notably, under certain conditions, superior-level government participation is not necessary for the formation of a medium–high intensity collaborative governance relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanjuan Wang & Hongbo Gong, 2022. "Formation Mechanism of a Coastal Zone Environment Collaborative Governance Relationship: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on fsQCA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:11081-:d:906478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/11081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/17/11081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gong, Qiang & Liu, Chong & Wu, Min, 2021. "Does administrative decentralization enhance economic growth? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 945-952.
    2. Rui Mu & Martin de Jong & Joop Koppenjan, 2019. "Assessing and explaining interagency collaboration performance: a comparative case study of local governments in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 581-605, April.
    3. Can Cui & Hongtao Yi, 2020. "What Drives the Performance of Collaboration Networks: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Local Water Governance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Bendor, Jonathan & Mookherjee, Dilip, 1987. "Institutional Structure and the Logic of Ongoing Collective Action," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(1), pages 129-154, March.
    5. Robyn Keast & Myrna Mandell, 2014. "The collaborative push: moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 9-28, February.
    6. Jisun Youm & Richard C. Feiock, 2019. "Interlocal collaboration and local climate protection," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 777-802, November.
    7. Myrna Mandell & Robyn Keast, 2008. "Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganizational relations through networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 715-731.
    8. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Samar Ali, Sadia, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 120-132.
    9. Wai Lam & Elinor Ostrom, 2010. "Analyzing the dynamic complexity of development interventions: lessons from an irrigation experiment in Nepal," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 43(1), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Ross McKitrick, 2006. "The politics of pollution: party regimes and air quality in Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 604-620, May.
    11. H. Igor Ansoff, 1979. "Strategic Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-02971-6.
    12. Yao Liu & Jiannan Wu & Hongtao Yi & Jing Wen, 2021. "Under what conditions do governments collaborate? A qualitative comparative analysis of air pollution control in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 1664-1682, November.
    13. Sattler, Claudia & Schröter, Barbara, 2022. "Collective action across boundaries: Collaborative network initiatives as boundary organizations to improve ecosystem services governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Fan, Wei & Yan, Ling & Chen, Boyang & Ding, Wangwang & Wang, Ping, 2022. "Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Scarff, Gavin & Fitzsimmons, Clare & Gray, Tim, 2015. "The new mode of marine planning in the UK: Aspirations and challenges," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 96-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinzhu Gao & Taitian An & Hongfen Zhang & Kuncheng Zhang & Jiawen Shen & Guangshun He & Xiao Yang & Rui Zhao & Shizheng Tian, 2023. "The Evaluation Method of the Marine Spatial Suitability for Islands from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: A Case Study of the Pingtan Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette Quayle & Johanne Grosvold & Larelle Chapple, 2019. "New modes of managing grand challenges: Cross-sector collaboration and the refugee crisis of the Asia Pacific," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(4), pages 665-686, November.
    2. Liming Suo & Xue Li & Shuai Cao, 2023. "How governance boundaries affect regional collaboration on atmospheric governance—Evidence from China's Yangtze River Delta," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 509-533, July.
    3. Soyoung Kim & Woo-Je Kim & Richard Clark Feiock, 2021. "An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Fanny Salignac & Tracy Wilcox & Axelle Marjolin & Sarah Adams, 2018. "Understanding Collective Impact in Australia: A new approach to interorganizational collaboration," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 91-110, February.
    5. Md. Ahashan Habib & Md. Rezaul Karim & Marzia Dulal & Mohammad Shayekh Munir, 2022. "Impact of Institutional Pressure on Cleaner Production and Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Azam Jean-Paul, 2014. "The Birth of a Democracy: Homegrown Bicameralism in Somaliland," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ahmed Hasanein & Ibrahim Elshaer, 2020. "Influences of Green Human Resources Management on Environmental Performance in Small Lodging Enterprises: The Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Surajit Bag & Shivam Gupta, 2017. "Antecedents of Sustainable Innovation in Supplier Networks: A South African Experience," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(3), pages 231-250, September.
    9. Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2016. "The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: Evidence from the automotive sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 342-355.
    10. Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir & Muhammad Yasir & Asad Javed, 2020. "Nexus of institutional pressures, environmentally friendly business strategies, and environmental performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 706-716, March.
    11. Li, Lei & Luo, Changtuo, 2023. "Does administrative decentralization promote outward foreign direct investment and productivity? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    12. Sangita Choudhary & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Simon Peter Nadeem, 2020. "The adoption of environmentally sustainable supply chain management: Measuring the relative effectiveness of hard dimensions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3104-3122, December.
    13. Wang, Quan-Jing & Wang, Hai-Jie & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2022. "Environmental performance, green finance and green innovation: What's the long-run relationships among variables?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    14. ter Bogt, Henk & Tillema, Sandra, 2016. "Accounting for trust and control: Public sector partnerships in the arts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 5-23.
    15. Graham, Stephanie & Graham, Byron & Holt, Diane, 2018. "The relationship between downstream environmental logistics practices and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 356-365.
    16. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Chung, Leanne & Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung & Li, Pansy Hon Ying, 2016. "The interaction effects of institutional constraints on managerial intentions and sustainable performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 374-383.
    18. Leroy, David, 2023. "An empirical assessment of the institutional performance of community-based water management in a large-scale irrigation system in southern Mexico," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    19. De Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth & Murgai, Rinku, 2002. "Rural development and rural policy," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 31, pages 1593-1658, Elsevier.
    20. Tarek Alaati & Muhammad Nizam & Ary Setyawan & Prabang Setyono, 2016. "Exploratory Study of Leadership Behavior Impact on Environmental Performance of Industrial Companies in Libya," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 119-119, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:11081-:d:906478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.