IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p327-d713461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

OTT Streaming Distribution Strategies for Dance Performances in the Post-COVID-19 Age: A Modified Importance-Performance Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Kim

    (College of Sports and Dance, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea)

  • Eunhye Kim

    (Global Research Institute for Arts and Culture Education, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea)

  • Aeryung Hong

    (Global Research Institute for Arts and Culture Education, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore strategies for distributing online content of dance post COVID-19 in Korea. And specially to discuss the distribution strategies of online performances through videoization of dance performances and OTT (over-the-top) streaming: (1) Methods: For this purpose, a survey was conducted on the distribution strategy of dance online contents for a total of 100 practitioners such as dance field, video contents, and art management. A total 91 sample were used except for defective questionnaires, and Vavra (1997)’s modified important performance analysis was conducted; (2) Results: The results of the matrix through the modified IPA analysis are as follows: first, the first quadrant included ‘quality of dance performance’, ‘platform for OTT streaming’, and ‘promotion for potential audience development’. This means that both explicit and intrinsic importance are high, and it is an important execution factor that has a positive effect on the satisfaction of the online contents of dance only if it is met. Second, the second quadrant included ‘brand awareness of choreographer or dance company’, ‘creative composition and choreography’, and ‘fee and price criteria’. This is a case of low explicit importance but high intrinsic importance, and these factors are attractive attributes that affect the satisfaction of dance online contents, although consumers do not expect it to be important. Third, the third quadrant included ‘new formats and curation’, ‘convergence technology (AR, VR, 3D, etc.) for the field sense’, and ‘online audience service (communication, membership, etc.)’. This means that both explicit and intrinsic importance are low, and if these factors are met, it can have a positive effect on the satisfaction of viewing of dance online contents. However, it does not have a negative effect even if it is not met. Fourth, in the fourth quadrant, ‘production and editing competency’, ‘quality of videos and sounds’, ‘copyright of performance creation’, and ‘fandom and audience management’ was included. This is an essential attribute in the distribution strategy of dance online contents because it has high explicit importance and low intrinsic importance, and it can have a negative impact on satisfaction when these factors are not met.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Kim & Eunhye Kim & Aeryung Hong, 2021. "OTT Streaming Distribution Strategies for Dance Performances in the Post-COVID-19 Age: A Modified Importance-Performance Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:327-:d:713461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Sungwook & Kwon, Youngsun, 2019. "Research on the Relationship between the Growth of OTT Service Market and the Change in the Structure of the Pay-TV Market," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205203, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Chun-Liang Chen, 2021. "Cultural product innovation strategies adopted by the performing arts industry," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1139-1171, July.
    3. Elisa Salvador & Jean-Paul Simon & Pierre-Jean Benghozi, 2019. "Facing disruption: the cinema value chain in the digital age," Post-Print hal-02300929, HAL.
    4. Hasan Bakhshi & David Throsby, 2014. "Digital complements or substitutes? A quasi-field experiment from the Royal National Theatre," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(1), pages 1-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marvao, Catarina & Borowiecki, Karol, 2015. "Dance Participation and Attendance in Denmark," SITE Working Paper Series 33, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics.
    2. Jang, Moonkyoung & Baek, Hyunmi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2021. "Movie characteristics as determinants of download-to-own performance in the Korean video-on-demand market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7).
    3. Patrizia Lattarulo & Marco Mariani & Laura Razzolini, 2017. "Nudging museums attendance: a field experiment with high school teens," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(3), pages 259-277, August.
    4. Karol J. Borowiecki & Trilce Navarrete, 2017. "Digitization of heritage collections as indicator of innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 227-246, April.
    5. Pablo De la Vega & Sara Suarez-Fernández & David Boto-García & Juan Prieto-Rodríguez, 2020. "Playing a play: online and live performing arts consumers profiles and the role of supply constraints," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(3), pages 425-450, September.
    6. Alexander Cuntz & Paul J. Heald & Matthias Sahli, 2023. "Digitization and Availability of Artworks in Online Museum Collections," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 75, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    7. Emilio Giardina & Isidoro Mazza & Giacomo Pignataro & Ilde Rizzo, 2016. "Voluntary Provision of Public Goods and Technology," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 22(3), pages 321-332, August.
    8. Elena Borin & Fabio Donato, 2023. "Financial Sustainability of Digitizing Cultural Heritage: The International Platform Europeana," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Victoria Ateca-Amestoy & Concetta Castiglione, 2023. "Live and digital engagement with the visual arts," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 47(4), pages 643-692, December.
    10. Geng Chen & Pei Tang, 2021. "Similar but special: an econometric analysis of live performing arts attendance in mainland China," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 459-490, September.
    11. Christian Peukert, 2019. "The next wave of digital technological change and the cultural industries," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(2), pages 189-210, June.
    12. Nam, Jinyoung & Ro, Dan & Jung, Yoonhyuk, 2023. "Netflix's presence: Investigating content producers' understanding of Netflix in the Korean media industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
    13. Jörg Henseler & Manuela Guerreiro & Nelson de Matos, 2021. "The interplay of marketing and design," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1129-1137, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:327-:d:713461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.