IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i6p2926-d516025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Primary Care Networks and Starfield’s 4Cs: A Case for Enhanced Chronic Disease Management

Author

Listed:
  • Chuan De Foo

    (Department of Health Systems and Behavioural Sciences, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    Contributed equally.)

  • Shilpa Surendran

    (Department of Health Systems and Behavioural Sciences, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore
    Contributed equally.)

  • Geronimo Jimenez

    (Centre for Population Health Sciences (CePHaS), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands)

  • John Pastor Ansah

    (Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore)

  • David Bruce Matchar

    (Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
    Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

  • Gerald Choon Huat Koh

    (Department of Health Systems and Behavioural Sciences, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore)

Abstract

The primary care network (PCN) was implemented as a healthcare delivery model which organises private general practitioners (GPs) into groups and furnished with a certain level of resources for chronic disease management. A secondary qualitative analysis was conducted with data from an earlier study exploring facilitators and barriers GPs enrolled in PCN’s face in chronic disease management. The objective of this study is to map features of PCN to Starfield’s “4Cs” framework. The “4Cs” of primary care—comprehensiveness, first contact access, coordination and continuity—offer high-quality design options for chronic disease management. Interview transcripts of GPs (n = 30) from the original study were purposefully selected. Provision of ancillary services, manpower, a chronic disease registry and extended operating hours of GP practices demonstrated PCN’s empowering features that fulfil the “4Cs”. On the contrary, operational challenges such as the lack of an integrated electronic medical record and disproportionate GP payment structures limit PCNs from maximising the “4Cs”. However, the enabling features mentioned above outweighs the shortfalls in all important aspects of delivering optimal chronic disease care. Therefore, even though PCN is in its early stage of development, it has shown to be well poised to steer GPs towards enhanced chronic disease management.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuan De Foo & Shilpa Surendran & Geronimo Jimenez & John Pastor Ansah & David Bruce Matchar & Gerald Choon Huat Koh, 2021. "Primary Care Networks and Starfield’s 4Cs: A Case for Enhanced Chronic Disease Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2926-:d:516025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/2926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armando Arredondo & Raul Aviles, 2015. "Costs and Epidemiological Changes of Chronic Diseases: Implications and Challenges for Health Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Ann S. O'Malley & Eugene C. Rich, 2015. "Measuring Comprehensiveness of Primary Care: Challenges and Opportunities," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 396b4b99dff5449abe549f025, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Ong Ming Lee Deborah & Marcus Yu Lung Chiu & Kai Cao, 2018. "Geographical Accessibility of Community Health Assist Scheme General Practitioners for the Elderly Population in Singapore: A Case Study on the Elderly Living in Housing Development Board Flats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Dusheiko, Mark & Gravelle, Hugh & Martin, Stephen & Rice, Nigel & Smith, Peter C., 2011. "Does better disease management in primary care reduce hospital costs? Evidence from English primary care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 919-932.
    5. Mark Dusheiko & Hugh Gravelle & Stephen Martin & Nigel Rice & Peter C Smith, 2011. "Does Better Disease Management in Primary Care Reduce Hospital Costs?," Working Papers 065cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Teik Hong Chen & Gerald Choon-Huat Koh & Ngan Phoon Fong & Jeremy Fung Yen Lim & Zoe Jane-Lara Hildon, 2023. "Evaluating the Effects of Capacity Building Initiatives and Primary Care Networks in Singapore: Outcome Harvesting of System Changes to Chronic Disease Care Delivery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeung-Hee Kim & Weon-Young Lee & Song Soo Lim & Young Taek Kim & Yeon-Pyo Hong, 2020. "Gender Differences in the Relationship between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Employment: Evidence from the Korea Health Panel Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Jasmin Kantarevic & Boris Kralj, 2013. "Link Between Pay For Performance Incentives And Physician Payment Mechanisms: Evidence From The Diabetes Management Incentive In Ontario," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(12), pages 1417-1439, December.
    3. Timothy Simcoe & Maryaline Catillon & Paul Gertler, 2019. "Who benefits most in disease management programs: Improving target efficiency," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 189-203, February.
    4. Griebenow, Malte, 2023. "Should physicians team up to treat chronic diseases?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Islam, M. Kamrul & Kjerstad, Egil, 2017. "Is incentivizing by subsidizing a better way of managing chronic health conditions?," Working Papers in Economics 12/17, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    6. Clémence Bussière & Nicolas Sirven & Thomas Rapp & Christine Sevilla‐Dedieu, 2020. "Adherence to medical follow‐up recommendations reduces hospital admissions: Evidence from diabetic patients in France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 508-522, April.
    7. Matteo Lippi Bruni & Irene Mammi, 2017. "Spatial effects in hospital expenditures: A district level analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S2), pages 63-77, September.
    8. Mauro Laudicella & Paolo Li Donni, 2022. "The dynamic interdependence in the demand of primary and emergency secondary care: A hidden Markov approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 521-536, April.
    9. David, Guy & Smith-McLallen, Aaron & Ukert, Benjamin, 2019. "The effect of predictive analytics-driven interventions on healthcare utilization," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 68-79.
    10. Jemimah Ride & Panos Kasteridis & Nils Gutacker & Hugh Gravelle & Nigel Rice & Anne Mason & Maria Goddard & Tim Doran & Rowena Jacobs, 2023. "Impact of prevention in primary care on costs in primary and secondary care for people with serious mental illness," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 343-355, February.
    11. Shen, Menghan & He, Wen & Li, Linyan, 2020. "Incentives to use primary care and their impact on healthcare utilization: Evidence using a public health insurance dataset in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    12. Johar, Meliyanni, 2012. "Do doctors charge high income patients more?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 596-599.
    13. Kongstad, L.P. & Mellace, G. & Olsen, K.R., 2016. "Can the use of Electronic Health Records in General Practice reduce hospitalizations for diabetes patients? Evidence from a natural experiment," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 16/25, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    14. Iezzi, Elisa & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina, 2014. "The role of GP's compensation schemes in diabetes care: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 104-120.
    15. Olsen, Kim Rose & Laudicella, Mauro, 2019. "Health care inequality in free access health systems: The impact of non-pecuniary incentives on diabetic patients in Danish general practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 174-183.
    16. Mengping Zhou & Jingyi Liao & Nan Hu & Li Kuang, 2020. "Association between Primary Healthcare and Medical Expenditures in a Context of Hospital-Oriented Healthcare System in China: A National Panel Dataset, 2012–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Waibel, Christian & Wiesen, Daniel, 2021. "An experiment on referrals in health care," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Fiorentini, Gianluca & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina, 2013. "GPs and hospital expenditures. Should we keep expenditure containment programs alive?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 10-20.
    19. Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Mammi, Irene & Ugolini, Cristina, 2016. "Does the extension of primary care practice opening hours reduce the use of emergency services?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 144-155.
    20. Wiebke Schuettig & Leonie Sundmacher, 2022. "The impact of ambulatory care spending, continuity and processes of care on ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(8), pages 1329-1340, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:6:p:2926-:d:516025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.