IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p6912-d583536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Responsibility and Misleading Advertising of Health Products on the Radio. The Opinion of the Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • María Teresa García-Nieto

    (Department of Theories and Analysis of Communication, Faculty of Information Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Juan Enrique Gonzálvez-Vallés

    (Department of Theories and Analysis of Communication, Faculty of Information Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Mónica Viñarás-Abad

    (Department of Applied Communication Sciences, Faculty of Information Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This research studies the opinion of advertising professionals in agencies, on the responsibility in relation to misleading advertising of health-related products, on the medium of radio. Through a closed survey of these professionals with different types of response, dichotomous, multiple choice and Likert scale, relevant results were obtained regarding compliance and application of the law and social responsibility linked to an advertising that directly affect health. The results show that only 10% of them know the legislation, although almost 90% of those surveyed consider it necessary to have legislative knowledge, and for only half of these, is it important. A large majority assure that the health sector should be one of the most protected sectors in the advertising world and, it should be noted, that the vast majority of the professionals surveyed view the legal restrictions on advertising in the health sector as positive. There is no unanimity as to who is responsible for the message, agency or advertiser. For its part, radio is presented as one of the most serious media and less prone to misleading advertising. To conclude, it can be stated that the professionals of the agencies do not perceive the existence of misleading advertising in the health sector, neither do they consider radio as one of the media where this deception can most occur. However, they coincide in stating that the health sector is one of the most dangerous if the damage that advertising deception can cause to consumers is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • María Teresa García-Nieto & Juan Enrique Gonzálvez-Vallés & Mónica Viñarás-Abad, 2021. "Social Responsibility and Misleading Advertising of Health Products on the Radio. The Opinion of the Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6912-:d:583536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6912/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6912/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Berry & Scot Burton & Elizabeth Howlett, 2017. "It’s only natural: the mediating impact of consumers’ attribute inferences on the relationships between product claims, perceived product healthfulness, and purchase intentions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 698-719, September.
    2. Kelly, B. & Halford, J.C.G. & Boyland, E.J. & Chapman, K. & Bautista-Castaño, I. & Berg, C. & Caroli, M. & Cook, B. & Coutinho, J.G. & Effertz, T. & Grammatikaki, E. & Keller, K. & Leung, R. & Manios,, 2010. "Television food advertising to children: A global perspective," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(9), pages 1730-1736.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andres Silva & Lindsey M. Higgins & Mohamud Hussein, 2015. "An Evaluation of the Effect of Child-Directed Television Food Advertising Regulation in the United Kingdom," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(4), pages 583-600, December.
    2. Tarabashkina, Liudmila & Quester, Pascale & Crouch, Roberta, 2016. "Exploring the moderating effect of children's nutritional knowledge on the relationship between product evaluations and food choice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-152.
    3. Elena Briones Alonso & Lara Cockx & Jo Swinnen, 2017. "Culture and food security," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 591898, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    4. Jingwen Liu & Peng Zou & Yu Ma, 2022. "The Effect of Air Pollution on Food Preferences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 410-423, March.
    5. Angela Chang & Peter J. Schulz & Tony Schirato & Brian J. Hall, 2018. "Implicit Messages Regarding Unhealthy Foodstuffs in Chinese Television Advertisements: Increasing the Risk of Obesity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Gloria Jiménez-Marín & Rodrigo Elías Zambrano & Araceli Galiano-Coronil & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2020. "Food and Beverage Advertising Aimed at Spanish Children Issued through Mobile Devices: A Study from a Social Marketing and Happiness Management Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Jacob Suher & Courtney Szocs & Koert Ittersum, 2021. "When imperfect is preferred: the differential effect of aesthetic imperfections on choice of processed and unprocessed foods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 903-924, September.
    8. Rybak, Garrett & Burton, Scot & Johnson, Alicia M. & Berry, Christopher, 2021. "Promoted claims on food product packaging: Comparing direct and indirect effects of processing and nutrient content claims," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 464-479.
    9. Abhishek Borah & Francesca Bonetti & Angelito Calma & José Martí-Parreño, 2023. "The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science at 50: A historical analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 222-243, January.
    10. Živa Korošec & Igor Pravst, 2016. "Television food advertising to children in Slovenia: analyses using a large 12-month advertising dataset," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(9), pages 1049-1057, December.
    11. Mireia Montaña Blasco & Mònika Jiménez-Morales, 2020. "Soft Drinks and Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Advertising in Spain: Correlation between Nutritional Values and Advertising Discursive Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Steingerdur Olafsdottir & Gabriele Eiben & Hillevi Prell & Sabrina Hense & Lauren Lissner & Staffan Mårild & Lucia Reisch & Christina Berg, 2014. "Young children’s screen habits are associated with consumption of sweetened beverages independently of parental norms," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 67-75, February.
    13. Victoria Villegas-Navas & Maria-Jose Montero-Simo & Rafael A. Araque-Padilla, 2019. "Investigating the Effects of Non-Branded Foods Placed in Cartoons on Children’s Food Choices through Type of Food, Modality and Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Cao, Zixia & Yan, Ruiliang, 2021. "Product nutrition, innovation, advertising, and firm’s financial gains," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 13-22.
    15. Michaela Jackson & Paul Harrison & Boyd Swinburn & Mark Lawrence, 2015. "Marketing ethics in context: the promotion of unhealthy foods and beverages to children," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 17, pages 354-386, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. David Mayer-Foulkes, 2010. "Democratic Economics and Improved Governance: Development Policies for the G20," Working papers DTE 487, CIDE, División de Economía.
    17. Barsyte, Justina & Fennis, Bob M., 2023. "When innovation backfires: Preference for predictability moderates the spillover of functional food ambivalence to the entire parent category," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Ariadne Beatrice Kapetanaki & Wendy J. Wills & Giada Danesi & Neil H. Spencer, 2019. "Socioeconomic Differences and the Potential Role of Tribes in Young People’s Food and Drink Purchasing Outside School at Lunchtime," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Dipayan Biswas & Kaisa Lund & Courtney Szocs, 2019. "Sounds like a healthy retail atmospheric strategy: Effects of ambient music and background noise on food sales," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 37-55, January.
    20. Christopher L. Newman & Scot Burton & J. Craig Andrews & Richard G. Netemeyer & Jeremy Kees, 2018. "Marketers’ use of alternative front-of-package nutrition symbols: An examination of effects on product evaluations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 453-476, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6912-:d:583536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.