IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3327-d356403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Cigarette Excise Tax Increases on Regular Drinking Behavior: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zili Zhang

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Rong Zheng

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
    World Health Organization Collaborating Center on Tobacco and Economics, 10 Huixin East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: Many studies have shown that increasing taxation on cigarettes does play a role in tobacco control, but few studies have focused on whether increasing cigarette excise taxes significantly affects alcohol consumption. In this article, we aim to examine the effects of China’s 2015 increase in the cigarette excise tax on residents’ regular drinking behavior. (2) Methods: Using survey data from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), we performed a panel logit regression analysis to model the relationship between the cigarette excise tax and regular drinking behavior. The Propensity Score Matching with Difference-in-Differences (PSM-DID) approach was adopted to determine the extent to which the cigarette excise tax affected residents’ drinking behavior. To test whether the cigarette excise tax could change regular drinking behavior by decreasing daily smoking quantity, we used an interaction term model. (3) Results: China’s 2015 increase in the cigarette excise tax had a significant negative effect on the probability of regular alcohol consumption among smokers, and the cigarette excise tax worked by reducing the average daily smoking of smokers. We also found that the regular drinking behavior of male smokers was more deeply affected by the increased cigarette excise tax than females. (4) Conclusions: Our research results not only give a deeper understanding of the impact of the cigarette excise tax, but also provide an important reference with which to guide future decisions concerning excise taxes imposed on cigarettes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zili Zhang & Rong Zheng, 2020. "The Impact of Cigarette Excise Tax Increases on Regular Drinking Behavior: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3327-:d:356403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3327/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3327/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikael Bask & Maria Melkersson, 2004. "Rationally addicted to drinking and smoking?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 373-381.
    2. Fred C. Pampel, 2002. "Cigarette Use and the Narrowing Sex Differential in Mortality," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 77-104, March.
    3. Thorsten Beck & Ross Levine & Alexey Levkov, 2010. "Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1637-1667, October.
    4. Alexandru Avram & Ana-Cristina Nicolescu & Costin Daniel Avram & Roxana Loredana Dan, 2019. "Financial Communication in the Context of Corporate Social Responsibility Growth," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 623-623, August.
    5. David Aristei & Luca Pieroni, 2010. "Habits, Complementarities and Heterogeneity in Alcohol and Tobacco Demand: A Multivariate Dynamic Model," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 72(4), pages 428-457, August.
    6. Erik Nesson, 2017. "Heterogeneity in Smokers' Responses to Tobacco Control Policies," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 206-225, February.
    7. Ferrer, Rebecca A. & Orehek, Edward & Scheier, Michael F. & O'Connell, Mary E., 2018. "Cigarette tax rates, behavioral disengagement, and quit ratios among daily smokers," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 13-21.
    8. Cetin, Tamer, 2017. "The effect of taxation and regulation on cigarette smoking: Fresh evidence from Turkey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1288-1295.
    9. Silles, Mary, 2015. "The causal effect of schooling on smoking behavior," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 102-116.
    10. Gabriel A. Picone & Frank Sloan & Justin G. Trogdon, 2004. "The effect of the tobacco settlement and smoking bans on alcohol consumption," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(10), pages 1063-1080, October.
    11. James J. Heckman & Hidehiko Ichimura & Petra Todd, 1998. "Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 65(2), pages 261-294.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jose Angelo Divino & Philipp Ehrl & Osvaldo Candido & Marcos Aurelio Pereira Valadao, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of a Tobacco Tax Reform on the Industry Price-Setting Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tauchmann, Harald & Göhlmann, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2007. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? – A Structural Model Approach," Ruhr Economic Papers 34, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    2. Koksal, Aycan & Wohlgenant, Michael, 2013. "Pseudo Panel Data Estimation Technique and Rational Addiction Model: An Analysis of Tobacco, Alcohol and Coffee Demands," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150457, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Tauchmann, Harald & Göhlmann, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2006. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach," RWI Discussion Papers 52, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    4. Yue-Jun Zhang & Jing-Yue Liu, 2019. "Does carbon emissions trading affect the financial performance of high energy-consuming firms in China?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(1), pages 91-111, January.
    5. Pierpaolo Pierani & Silvia Tiezzi, 2009. "Addiction and interaction between alcohol and tobacco consumption," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Li, Bo & Han, Yukai & Wang, Chensheng & Sun, Wei, 2022. "Did civilized city policy improve energy efficiency of resource-based cities? Prefecture-level evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Yi Luo & Zhiwei Tang & Peiqi Fan, 2021. "Could Government Data Openness Enhance Urban Innovation Capability? An Evaluation Based on Multistage DID Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Qiang Li & Wenjuan Ruan & Huimin Shi & Erwei Xiang & Feida (Frank) Zhang, 2022. "Corporate environmental information disclosure and bank financing: Moderating effect of formal and informal institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2931-2946, November.
    9. Sara Markowitz & John Tauras, 2009. "Substance use among adolescent students with consideration of budget constraints," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 423-446, December.
    10. Aycan Koksal & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 2016. "How do smoking bans in restaurants affect restaurant and at-home alcohol consumption?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1193-1213, June.
    11. Benjamin Ukert, 2017. "The short- and long-run effects of smoking cessation on alcohol consumption," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 495-519, December.
    12. Gaowen Lei & Sidai Guo & Zihan Yuan, 2022. "Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Circular Economy Promotion Law on the Utilization Rate of Industrial Solid Waste in Resource-Based Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Tauchmann, Harald & Lenz, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2013. "Tobacco and alcohol: complements or substitutes?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 539-566.
    14. Yang, Zhenbing & Chen, Zhuo & Shao, Shuai & Yang, Lili, 2022. "Unintended consequences of additional support on the publications of universities: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Koksal, Aycan & Wohlgenant, Michael, 2013. "Interdependence of Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption: A Natural Experiment Approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150459, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Göhlmann, Silja & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2008. "Smoking in Germany: Stylized Facts, Behavioral Models, and Health Policy," Ruhr Economic Papers 64, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Michael T. Owyang & E. Katarina Vermann, 2012. "Where there’s a smoking ban, there’s still fire," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 94(July), pages 265-286.
    18. Adrian R. Fleissig, 2020. "Impact of Casino Gambling and Lotteries on Demand for Other ‘Sin’ Goods," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 48(3), pages 327-338, September.
    19. Xiaoshu Xu & Airong Yue & Xuechen Meng, 2023. "Increase in Industrial Sulfur Dioxide Pollution Fee and Polluting Firms’ Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Shuai Luo & Xinhua Yang & Qicheng Li, 2022. "The Impact of High-Speed Rail and Central Cities on Enterprise Financing Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3327-:d:356403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.