IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p406-d202266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loneliness of Older Adults: Social Network and the Living Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid Kemperman

    (Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Pauline van den Berg

    (Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Minou Weijs-Perrée

    (Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Kevin Uijtdewillegen

    (Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The social participation and integration of older adults are important aspects of healthy aging. However, in general, older adults have smaller social networks than their younger counterparts due to changes in their life cycle stage, such as retirement or age-related losses, along with a declining health and increasing mobility limitations. Consequently, with increasing age, an increasing proportion of older people experience feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Previous studies that have analyzed the relationships between loneliness, social networks, and the living environment have often been based on bivariate relationships or included only a limited number of variables. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze multiple relationships in a more comprehensive framework. Data were collected using a survey among 182 adults aged 65 years and over in the Netherlands. A Bayesian belief network (BBN) modeling approach was used that derives all direct and indirect relationships between the variables. The results showed that feelings of loneliness are directly related to satisfaction with one’s social network and neighborhood attachment and are indirectly related to perceived safety and satisfaction with local amenities and services. This knowledge is relevant to urban planners and policy makers who focus on creating livable and healthy social neighborhoods for the aging population.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid Kemperman & Pauline van den Berg & Minou Weijs-Perrée & Kevin Uijtdewillegen, 2019. "Loneliness of Older Adults: Social Network and the Living Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:406-:d:202266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lauritzen, Steffen L., 1995. "The EM algorithm for graphical association models with missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 191-201, February.
    2. Bowling, Ann & Stafford, Mai, 2007. "How do objective and subjective assessments of neighbourhood influence social and physical functioning in older age? Findings from a British survey of ageing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 2533-2549, June.
    3. Minou Weijs-Perrée & Pauline Van den Berg & Theo Arentze & Astrid Kemperman, 2017. "Social networks, social satisfaction and place attachment in the neighborhood," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 133-151.
    4. Eric Bonsang & Arthur Soest, 2012. "Satisfaction with Job and Income Among Older Individuals Across European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 227-254, January.
    5. Suurmeijer, T.P.B.M. & Doeglas, D.M. & Moum, T. & Briancon, S. & Krol, B. & Sanderman, R. & Guillemin, F. & Bjelle, A. & Van den Heuvel, W.J.A., 1994. "The Groningen Activity Restriction Scale for measuring disability: Its utility in international comparisons," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(8), pages 1270-1273.
    6. Metz, D. H., 2000. "Mobility of older people and their quality of life," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 149-152, April.
    7. Weijs-Perrée, Minou & van den Berg, Pauline & Arentze, Theo & Kemperman, Astrid, 2015. "Factors influencing social satisfaction and loneliness: a path analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 24-31.
    8. Delmelle, Elizabeth C. & Haslauer, Eva & Prinz, Thomas, 2013. "Social satisfaction, commuting and neighborhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 110-116.
    9. Spinney, Jamie E.L. & Scott, Darren M. & Newbold, K. Bruce, 2009. "Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: A time-use perspective of elderly Canadians," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, January.
    10. Tim Schwanen & Donggen Wang, 2014. "Well-Being, Context, and Everyday Activities in Space and Time," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(4), pages 833-851, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasiliki Tzouvara & Pinar Kupdere, 2022. "Examining Differences, Relationships, and Predictors for Loneliness in an Adult Population: The Roles of Personal Characteristics, Place of Residence, Leisure Activities, Mental Health, and Social Out," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Deepti Adlakha & Mina Chandra & Murali Krishna & Lee Smith & Mark A. Tully, 2021. "Designing Age-Friendly Communities: Exploring Qualitative Perspectives on Urban Green Spaces and Ageing in Two Indian Megacities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Tanja Brüchert & Paula Quentin & Sabine Baumgart & Gabriele Bolte, 2021. "Barriers, Facilitating Factors, and Intersectoral Collaboration for Promoting Active Mobility for Healthy Aging—A Qualitative Study within Local Government in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Cheung, Hiu Ying & Fu, Yu Qi & Yang, Zan, 2023. "Older People’s Choice of the Community-based Care: A Welfare Pluralism Perspective," Working Paper Series 23/7, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    6. Francesca C. Ezeokonkwo & Kathleen L. Sekula & Jeffrey E. Stokes & Laurie A. Theeke & Rick Zoucha & Meredith Troutman-Jordan & Dinesh Sharma, 2023. "Relationships between Interpersonal Goals and Loneliness in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Mateja Lorber & Sergej Kmetec & Adam Davey & Nataša Mlinar Reljić & Zvonka Fekonja & Barbara Kegl, 2023. "Associations between Sleep Quality, Frailty, and Quality of Life among Older Adults in Community and Nursing Home Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Lisanne Bergefurt & Astrid Kemperman & Pauline van den Berg & Aloys Borgers & Peter van der Waerden & Gert Oosterhuis & Marco Hommel, 2019. "Loneliness and Life Satisfaction Explained by Public-Space Use and Mobility Patterns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Simone A. Tomaz & Pete Coffee & Gemma C. Ryde & Bridgitte Swales & Kacey C. Neely & Jenni Connelly & Andrew Kirkland & Louise McCabe & Karen Watchman & Federico Andreis & Jack G. Martin & Ilaria Pina , 2021. "Loneliness, Wellbeing, and Social Activity in Scottish Older Adults Resulting from Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Tore Bonsaksen & Mariyana Schoultz & Hilde Thygesen & Mary Ruffolo & Daicia Price & Janni Leung & Amy Østertun Geirdal, 2021. "Loneliness and Its Associated Factors Nine Months after the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-National Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-11, March.
    11. Wenlong Li & Suocheng Dong & Haiying Lin & Yu Li & Zehong Li & Zhuang Jin & Bing Xia, 2022. "Influence of Rural Social Capital and Production Mode on the Subjective Well-Being of Farmers and Herdsmen: Empirical Discovery on Farmers and Herdsmen in Inner Mongolia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Abby C. King & Diane K. King & Ann Banchoff & Smadar Solomonov & Ofir Ben Natan & Jenna Hua & Paul Gardiner & Lisa Goldman Rosas & Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa & Sandra J. Winter & Jylana Sheats & Debo, 2020. "Employing Participatory Citizen Science Methods to Promote Age-Friendly Environments Worldwide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, February.
    13. Lanzhi Wei & Jianou Xu & Caifeng Luo & Rongzhu Lu & Hui Shi, 2022. "Latent Profile Analysis of Self-Supporting Ability among Rural Empty-Nesters in Northwestern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Jinxin Yang & Din Jong, 2021. "Understanding Continuance Intention Determinants to Adopt Online Health Care Community: An Empirical Study of Food Safety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linh Nguyen & Pauline van den Berg & Astrid Kemperman & Masi Mohammadi, 2020. "Where do People Interact in High-Rise Apartment Buildings? Exploring the Influence of Personal and Neighborhood Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Navarrete-Hernandez, Pablo & Christopher Zegras, P., 2023. "Mind the perception gap: The impact of bus rapid transit infrastructure on travelers’ perceptions of affective subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. He, Sylvia Y. & Cheung, Yannie H.Y. & Tao, Sui, 2018. "Travel mobility and social participation among older people in a transit metropolis: A socio-spatial-temporal perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 608-626.
    4. Lisanne Bergefurt & Astrid Kemperman & Pauline van den Berg & Aloys Borgers & Peter van der Waerden & Gert Oosterhuis & Marco Hommel, 2019. "Loneliness and Life Satisfaction Explained by Public-Space Use and Mobility Patterns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Dong, Han & Zhang, Jun & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2019. "Exploring, understanding, and modeling the reciprocal relation between leisure and subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 813-824.
    6. Ranković Plazinić, Biljana & Jović, Jadranka, 2018. "Mobility and transport potential of elderly in differently accessible rural areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 169-180.
    7. Mouratidis, Kostas, 2019. "Built environment and leisure satisfaction: The role of commute time, social interaction, and active travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Deka, Devajyoti, 2014. "The role of household members in transporting adults with disabilities in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 45-57.
    9. Spinney, Jamie E.L. & Newbold, K. Bruce & Scott, Darren M. & Vrkljan, Brenda & Grenier, Amanda, 2020. "The impact of driving status on out-of-home and social activity engagement among older Canadians," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Morris, Eric A., 2015. "Should we all just stay home? Travel, out-of-home activities, and life satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 519-536.
    12. Mitra, Suman & Yao, Mingqi & Ritchie, Stephen G., 2021. "Gender differences in elderly mobility in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 203-226.
    13. Wong, R.C.P. & Szeto, W.Y. & Yang, Linchuan & Li, Y.C. & Wong, S.C., 2018. "Public transport policy measures for improving elderly mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 73-79.
    14. Wong, R.C.P. & Yang, Linchuan & Szeto, W.Y. & Li, Y.C. & Wong, S.C., 2020. "The effects of accessible taxi service and taxi fare subsidy scheme on the elderly's willingness-to-travel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 129-136.
    15. Fuyo (Jenny) Yamamoto & Junyi Zhang, 2017. "The Kindness of Strangers: Exploring Interdependencies and Shared Mobilities of Elderly People in Rural Japan," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 183-195.
    16. Weijs-Perrée, Minou & van den Berg, Pauline & Arentze, Theo & Kemperman, Astrid, 2015. "Factors influencing social satisfaction and loneliness: a path analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 24-31.
    17. Chunyan Yang & Song Shi & Goran Runeson, 2022. "Associations between Community Parks and Social Interactions in Master-Planned Estates in Sydney, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Wood, Lisa & Hine, Julian & Currie, Graham & Giles-Corti, Billie & Turrell, Gavin, 2014. "Patterns of social capital associated with transit oriented development," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 144-155.
    19. Pettersson, Pierre & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk, 2010. "Active ageing in developing countries? – trip generation and tour complexity of older people in Metro Manila," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 613-623.
    20. Jonas De Vos, 2019. "Analysing the effect of trip satisfaction on satisfaction with the leisure activity at the destination of the trip, in relationship with life satisfaction," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 623-645, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:406-:d:202266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.