IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i2p197-d196990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Researching Parental Socialization Styles across Three Cultural Contexts: Scale ESPA29 Bi-Dimensional Validity in Spain, Portugal, and Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel Martínez

    (Department of Psychology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda de los Alfares 44, 16071 Cuenca, Spain)

  • Fernando Garcia

    (Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibanez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • María C. Fuentes

    (Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibanez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Feliciano Veiga

    (Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Oscar F. Garcia

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibanez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Yara Rodrigues

    (Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Edie Cruise

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, D-54296 Trier, Germany)

  • Emilia Serra

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibanez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Recent research that relates parenting with adolescent adjustment has shown the importance of considering the cultural context of the relationship. New results are emerging when considering the classical four-typologies model of parental socialization in some European and South-American countries. Among the instruments used in this emergent research is the Parental Socialization Scale ESPA29. This scale is a bi-dimensional parenting instrument that was specifically developed to measure the four parenting typologies, through the dimensions of acceptance/involvement and strictness/imposition. This study examines the good fit of the orthogonal bi-factor model based on the ESPA29 versus one-dimensional and bi-dimensional oblique alternative models, with three adolescent samples from 12 to 17 years old (53.4% girls), from Spain ( N = 826), Portugal ( N = 752), and Brazil ( N = 628). We applied structural equation models (SEMs) to analyze the fit of the models to the data. The results confirm a better fit to the data for the orthogonal bi-factor model versus one-dimensional and bi-dimensional oblique alternative models across country, adolescent sex, and the three age groups. Additionally, the convergent validity of the scale was proved by showing the relation of the two parenting dimensions with self-concept. The results guarantee the adequacy of the ESPA29 to measure parenting styles.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel Martínez & Fernando Garcia & María C. Fuentes & Feliciano Veiga & Oscar F. Garcia & Yara Rodrigues & Edie Cruise & Emilia Serra, 2019. "Researching Parental Socialization Styles across Three Cultural Contexts: Scale ESPA29 Bi-Dimensional Validity in Spain, Portugal, and Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:197-:d:196990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/2/197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2001. "A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 507-514, December.
    2. Mònica González-Carrasco & Ferran Casas & Ferran Viñas & Sara Malo & M. Eugènia Gras & Lívia Bedin, 2017. "What Leads Subjective Well-Being to Change Throughout Adolescence? An Exploration of Potential Factors," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(1), pages 33-56, March.
    3. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    4. David Moreno-Ruiz & Estefanía Estévez & Teresa I. Jiménez & Sergio Murgui, 2018. "Parenting Style and Reactive and Proactive Adolescent Violence: Evidence from Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paloma Alonso-Stuyck, 2019. "Which Parenting Style Encourages Healthy Lifestyles in Teenage Children? Proposal for a Model of Integrative Parenting Styles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-7, June.
    2. Paloma Alonso-Stuyck, 2020. "Parenting and Healthy Teenage Lifestyles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Miriam Gallarin & Barbara Torres-Gomez & Itziar Alonso-Arbiol, 2021. "Aggressiveness in Adopted and Non-Adopted Teens: The Role of Parenting, Attachment Security, and Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Anna M. Bujnowska & Celestino Rodríguez & Trinidad García & Débora Areces & Nigel V. Marsh, 2019. "Parenting and Future Anxiety: The Impact of Having a Child with Developmental Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. María C. Fuentes & Rafael García-Ros & Francisco Pérez-González & Dolores Sancerni, 2019. "Effects of Parenting Styles on Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Stress in Spanish Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Pilar Ridao & Isabel López-Verdugo & Carmen Reina-Flores, 2021. "Parental Beliefs about Childhood and Adolescence from a Longitudinal Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Loera & Daniela Converso & Sara Viotti, 2014. "Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) among Italian Nurses: How Many Factors Must a Researcher Consider?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Inge Axpe & Arantzazu Rodríguez-Fernández & Eider Goñi & Iratxe Antonio-Agirre, 2019. "Parental Socialization Styles: The Contribution of Paternal and Maternal Affect/Communication and Strictness to Family Socialization Style," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Luisa Corrado & Giuseppe De Michele, 2016. "Mind the Gap: Identifying Latent Objective and Subjective Multi-dimensional Indices of Well-Being," CEIS Research Paper 386, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 24 Jun 2016.
    4. Arantzazu Rodríguez-Fernández & Iker Izar-de-la-Fuente & Naiara Escalante & Lorea Azpiazu, 2021. "Perceived Social Support for a Sustainable Adolescence: A Theoretical Model of Its Sources and Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Antonio Chirumbolo & Antonino Callea & Flavio Urbini, 2021. "The Effect of Job Insecurity and Life Uncertainty on Everyday Consumptions and Broader Life Projects during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Ilona Szőcs & Bodo B. Schlegelmilch & Thomas Rusch & Hamed M. Shamma, 2016. "Linking cause assessment, corporate philanthropy, and corporate reputation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 376-396, May.
    7. Laura Vieten & Anne Marit Wöhrmann & Alexandra Michel, 2022. "Work-Time Control and Exhaustion: Internal Work-to-Home Interference and Internal Home-to-Work Interference as Mediators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Jiwon Lee & Midam An & Yongku Kim & Jung-In Seo, 2021. "Optimal Allocation for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-10, September.
    9. Benjamin G Schultz & Catherine J Stevens & Peter E Keller & Barbara Tillmann, 2013. "A Sequence Identification Measurement Model to Investigate the Implicit Learning of Metrical Temporal Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    10. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    11. Ruth Hancock & Marcello Morciano & Stephen Pudney & Francesca Zantomio, 2015. "Do household surveys give a coherent view of disability benefit targeting?: a multisurvey latent variable analysis for the older population in Great Britain," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 178(4), pages 815-836, October.
    12. Dara M Wald & Susan K Jacobson, 2014. "A Multivariate Model of Stakeholder Preference for Lethal Cat Management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Andreas Wienke & Anne M. Herskind & Kaare Christensen & Axel Skytthe & Anatoli I. Yashin, 2002. "The influence of smoking and BMI on heritability in susceptibility to coronary heart disease," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2002-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    14. Flore Geukens & Annette Spithoven & Margot Bastin & Janne Vanhalst & Marlies Maes, 2022. "Lonely in Different Relationships: Bidirectional Effects between Parent- and Peer-Related Loneliness in Adolescence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Peter Tavel & Bibiana Jozefiakova & Peter Telicak & Jana Furstova & Michal Puza & Natalia Kascakova, 2022. "Psychometric Analysis of the Shortened Version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale on the Slovak Population (SWBS-Sk)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.
    17. Haiyang Lu & Peng Nie & Alfonso Sousa-Poza, 2021. "The Effect of Parental Educational Expectations on Adolescent Subjective Well-Being and the Moderating Role of Perceived Academic Pressure: Longitudinal Evidence for China," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(1), pages 117-137, February.
    18. Berry, Brian J.L. & Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam, 2008. "Are there ENSO signals in the macroeconomy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 625-633, January.
    19. Nicos Nicolaou & Scott Shane, 2019. "Common genetic effects on risk-taking preferences and choices," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 261-279, December.
    20. Stephen Richards, 2010. "Author's response," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(4), pages 920-924, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:197-:d:196990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.