IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p5007-d295937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Consumer’s Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case

Author

Listed:
  • Jianhong He

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China)

  • Yaling Lei

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China)

  • Xiao Fu

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China)

Abstract

Today, complex consumer purchase decisions affect company revolution, especially that dealing with environmental (green) innovation. Consumer preferences and pricing could interact in influencing green innovation. This situation is especially vital in industries that are characterized with many safety concerns that urge collaborative development between consumers and companies, such as the food industry. The aim of this paper is to explore the influence of the change in consumer preference characteristics on the green innovation efforts of the food supply chain, introducing the green preference of consumers and the reference price effect. A differential game model of green innovation in the food supply chain is constructed in this paper and solved. It was found that the change in consumer preference characteristics is an important factor to motivate supply chain members to make green innovation efforts. With the enhancement of consumer preference characteristics, the Pareto improvement effect of cost-sharing contracts on the profits of supply chain enterprises is clearer. Further, manufacturers can stimulate suppliers’ green innovation efforts through cost-sharing contracts. When the marginal profit ratio of food supply chain members reaches a certain threshold, the incentive effect of this cost-sharing contract is more significant, and it is more likely to realize the optimal profit of the food supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianhong He & Yaling Lei & Xiao Fu, 2019. "Do Consumer’s Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5007-:d:295937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5007/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5007/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Ramanathan, Usha & Bentley, Yongmei, 2018. "The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance – A novel use of DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 131-138.
    2. Carvalho, Helena & Govindan, Kannan & Azevedo, Susana G. & Cruz-Machado, Virgílio, 2017. "Modelling green and lean supply chains: An eco-efficiency perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 75-87.
    3. Guowei Liu & Suresh P. Sethi & Jianxiong Zhang, 2016. "Myopic vs. far-sighted behaviours in a revenue-sharing supply chain with reference quality effects," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1334-1357, March.
    4. Zissis, Dimitris & Ioannou, George & Burnetas, Apostolos, 2015. "Supply chain coordination under discrete information asymmetries and quantity discounts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 21-29.
    5. Kammerer, Daniel, 2009. "The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation.: Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2285-2295, June.
    6. Klaiman, Kimberly & Ortega, David L. & Garnache, Cloé, 2016. "Consumer preferences and demand for packaging material and recyclability," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Taboubi, Sihem, 2015. "Price coordination in distribution channels: A dynamic perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 401-414.
    8. Liu, Zugang (Leo) & Anderson, Trisha D. & Cruz, Jose M., 2012. "Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 602-613.
    9. Rosa Dangelico & Devashish Pujari, 2010. "Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 471-486, September.
    10. El Ouardighi, Fouad, 2014. "Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: A two-stage game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 260-268.
    11. Radnejad, Amir Bahman & Vredenburg, Harrie & Woiceshyn, Jaana, 2017. "Meta-organizing for open innovation under environmental and social pressures in the oil industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 66, pages 14-27.
    12. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    13. Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2017. "Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 228-250.
    14. Hsieh, Tsu-Pang & Dye, Chung-Yuan, 2017. "Optimal dynamic pricing for deteriorating items with reference price effects when inventories stimulate demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 136-150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuemei Fan & Ziyue Nan & Yuanhang Ma & Yingdan Zhang & Fei Han, 2021. "Research on the Spatio-Temporal Impacts of Environmental Factors on the Fresh Agricultural Product Supply Chain and the Spatial Differentiation Issue—An Empirical Research on 31 Chinese Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Hongyu Long & Hongyong Liu & Xingwei Li & Longjun Chen, 2020. "An Evolutionary Game Theory Study for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Considering Green Development Performance under the Chinese Government’s Reward–Penalty Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Ping Yu & Linhui Zeng, 2024. "The Impact of Consumer Environmental Preferences on the Green Technological Innovation of Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Genhasi Ge & Daoping Wang & Mesumbe Bianca Epede, 2022. "Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Dooho Lee, 2020. "Who Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretical Analysis of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Different Power Structures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Min Fu & Wensong Wu & Lixin Tian & Zaili Zhen & Jing Ye, 2023. "Analysis of Emission Reduction Mechanism of High-Tiered Carbon Tax under Green and Low Carbon Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rezayat, Mohammad Reza & Yaghoubi, Saeed & Fander, Atieh, 2021. "The impact of government intervention in competitive electronic closed-loop supply chain to support internal industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Zhichao Zhang & Qing Zhang & Zhi Liu & Xiaoxue Zheng, 2018. "Static and Dynamic Pricing Strategies in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Reference Quality Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, January.
    3. Ren, Da & Guo, Rui & Lan, Yanfei & Shang, Changjing, 2021. "Shareholding strategies for selling green products on online platforms in a two-echelon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Xinmin Liu & Kangkang Lin & Lei Wang & Lili Ding, 2020. "Pricing Decisions for a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Presence of Potential Strategic Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Qiao Zhang & Jianxiong Zhang & Wansheng Tang, 2017. "Coordinating a supply chain with green innovation in a dynamic setting," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 133-162, June.
    6. Jiguang Wang & Jianhong Chang & Yucai Wu, 2020. "The Optimal Production Decision of Competing Supply Chains When Considering Green Degree: A Game-Theoretic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Ni, Jian & Zhao, Jun & Chu, Lap Keung, 2021. "Supply contracting and process innovation in a dynamic supply chain with information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 552-562.
    8. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    9. Zhaofu Hong & Hao Wang & Yeming Gong, 2019. "Green product design considering functional-product reference," Post-Print hal-02312293, HAL.
    10. Chen, Wenbo, 2018. "Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharingAuthor-Name: Yang, Huixiao," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-191.
    11. Ji, Jingna & Li, Tao & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Gema Albort-Morant & Jörg Henseler & Antonio Leal-Millán & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrión, 2017. "Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Mihaela PÃCESILÃ & Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU, 2017. "Systematic Literature Review On Eco-Innovation Determinants," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(3), pages 30-44, September.
    15. Qiong Yao & Suzhen Zeng & Shibin Sheng & Shiyuan Gong, 2021. "Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 573-602, June.
    16. Jang-Hwan Jo & Tae Woo Roh & Seonghoon Kim & Yeo-Chang Youn & Mi Sun Park & Ki Joo Han & Eun Kyung Jang, 2015. "Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Ouardighi, Fouad El & Sim, Jeong Eun & Kim, Bowon, 2016. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 982-996.
    18. Hui Li & Chuanxu Wang & Meng Shang & Wei Ou, 2017. "Pricing, Carbon Emission Reduction, Low-Carbon Promotion and Returning Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    20. Păcesilă, Mihaela & Ciocoiu, Carmen Nadia, 2017. "Eco-Innovation and its Determinants: A Review of the Emerging Literature," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2017), Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 7-9 September 2017, pages 134-144, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5007-:d:295937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.