IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7555-d1279270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Emission Reduction Mechanism of High-Tiered Carbon Tax under Green and Low Carbon Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Min Fu

    (Research Institute of Carbon Neutralization Development, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Wensong Wu

    (Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Industrial Carbon System Analysis, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Lixin Tian

    (Research Institute of Carbon Neutralization Development, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Key Laboratory for NSLSCS, Ministry of Education, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Zaili Zhen

    (Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Industrial Carbon System Analysis, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Key Laboratory for NSLSCS, Ministry of Education, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Jing Ye

    (Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Industrial Carbon System Analysis, School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

Abstract

This article studies the emission reduction mechanism of high-tiered carbon taxes under green and low-carbon behavior in single and two-stage supply chains. First, based on the Cournot game model, it explores the impact of high-tiered carbon tax policies on supply chain carbon reduction decisions in the green exchange market. By analyzing the effects of implementing a high-tiered carbon tax policy, the basic characteristics of its implementation are identified, and the advantages of a high-tiered carbon tax compared to a unified carbon tax are summarized. Second, it establishes a carbon reduction technology investment cost-sharing model and a carbon tax cost-sharing model under the high-tiered carbon tax policy. It analyzes and studies the impact of high-tiered carbon tax policies on balancing the relationship between members of the two-level supply chain through optimal decision-making of the two-level supply chain under two cost-sharing strategies, revealing the emission reduction mechanism of the two-level supply chain under high-tiered carbon tax policies. The results indicate that there are extreme points in the emission reduction rates of producers in the green exchange market under both the high-tiered carbon tax policy and the unified carbon tax policy. It shows that the two cost-sharing strategies can effectively alleviate the cost burden for producers, increase their marginal profits, and promote further improvement in emission reduction. It explores the emission reduction mechanism of high-tiered carbon taxes and future research should delve into the emission reduction mechanism of high-tiered carbon taxes in different carbon emission departments and regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Fu & Wensong Wu & Lixin Tian & Zaili Zhen & Jing Ye, 2023. "Analysis of Emission Reduction Mechanism of High-Tiered Carbon Tax under Green and Low Carbon Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7555-:d:1279270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Zugang (Leo) & Anderson, Trisha D. & Cruz, Jose M., 2012. "Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 602-613.
    2. Kotchen, Matthew J., 2005. "Impure public goods and the comparative statics of environmentally friendly consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 281-300, March.
    3. Gary H. Chao & Seyed M. R. Iravani & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1138, July.
    4. Jianhong He & Yaling Lei & Xiao Fu, 2019. "Do Consumer’s Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Ni, Debing & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Xiaowo, 2010. "Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from wholesale price contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1269-1279, December.
    6. Ghosh, Debabrata & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 319-329.
    7. Florian Landis & Sebastian Rausch & Mirjam Kosch, 2018. "Differentiated Carbon Prices and the Economic Cost of Decarbonization," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 483-516, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Han, Xiaoya & Khouja, Moutaz & Liu, Xin, 2023. "A dynamic model considering consumer green awareness and environmental subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    4. Yong Liu & Bing-ting Quan & Jiao Li & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2018. "A Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Cost Sharing of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    5. He, Yi & Wang, Hang & Guo, Qiang & Xu, Qingyun, 2019. "Coordination through cooperative advertising in a two-period consumer electronics supply chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 179-188.
    6. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Ouardighi, Fouad El & Sim, Jeong Eun & Kim, Bowon, 2016. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 982-996.
    8. Hui Li & Chuanxu Wang & Meng Shang & Wei Ou, 2017. "Pricing, Carbon Emission Reduction, Low-Carbon Promotion and Returning Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Jianhong He & Yaling Lei & Xiao Fu, 2019. "Do Consumer’s Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    11. Yong Liu & Wenwen Ren & Qian Xu & Zhi-yang Liu, 2022. "Decision analysis of supply chains considering corporate social responsibility and government subsidy under different channel power structures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1841-1869, August.
    12. Xiong Gao & Yuhong Wang, 2019. "Study on Benefit Coordination of Supply Chain Network Based on Green Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Longfei He & Baiyun Yuan & Junsong Bian & Kin Keung Lai, 2023. "Differential game theoretic analysis of the dynamic emission abatement in low-carbon supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 355-393, May.
    14. Shengliang Zong & Chunyang Shen & Siping Su, 2022. "Decision Making in Green Supply Chain with Manufacturers’ Misreporting Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Regulatory versus consumer pressure and retailer responsibility for upstream pollution in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Ren, Da & Guo, Rui & Lan, Yanfei & Shang, Changjing, 2021. "Shareholding strategies for selling green products on online platforms in a two-echelon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Shan Chen & Xu Wang & Lin Ni & Yingbo Wu, 2017. "Pricing Policies in Green Supply Chains with Vertical and Horizontal Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Xia, Senmao & Ling, Yantao & de Main, Leanne & Lim, Ming K. & Li, Gendao & Zhang, Peter & Cao, Mengqiu, 2022. "Creating a low carbon economy through green supply chain management: investigation of willingness-to-pay for green products from a consumer’s perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116895, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2015. "A bilevel programming model for corporate social responsibility collaboration in sustainable supply chain management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 84-95.
    20. Yantao Ling & Jing Xu, 2021. "Price and greenness competition between duopoly firms considering consumer premium payments," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3853-3880, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7555-:d:1279270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.