IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i9p748-d78146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Opportunities from Lignocellulosic Biomass for a Biorefinery Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Cotana

    (CIRIAF, Interuniversity Research Center on Pollution and Environment “M. Felli”—University of Perugia CRB Section Via G. Duranti, 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

  • Gianluca Cavalaglio

    (CIRIAF, Interuniversity Research Center on Pollution and Environment “M. Felli”—University of Perugia CRB Section Via G. Duranti, 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

  • Valentina Coccia

    (CIRIAF, Interuniversity Research Center on Pollution and Environment “M. Felli”—University of Perugia CRB Section Via G. Duranti, 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

  • Alessandro Petrozzi

    (CIRIAF, Interuniversity Research Center on Pollution and Environment “M. Felli”—University of Perugia CRB Section Via G. Duranti, 63, 06125 Perugia, Italy)

Abstract

This work presents some energy considerations concerning a biorefinery case study that has been carried out by the CRB/CIRIAF of the University of Perugia. The biorefinery is the case study of the BIT3G project, a national funded research project, and it uses the lignocellulosic biomass that is available in the territory as input materials for biochemical purposes, such as cardoon and carthamus . The whole plant is composed of several sections: the cardoon and carthamus seed milling, the oil refinement facilities, and the production section of some high quality biochemicals, i.e., bio-oils and fatty acids. The main goal of the research is to demonstrate energy autonomy of the latter section of the biorefinery, while only recovering energy from the residues resulting from the collection of the biomass. To this aim, this work presents the quantification of the energy requirements to be supplied to the considered biorefinery section, the mass flow, and the energy and chemical characterization of the biomass. Afterwards, some sustainability strategies have been qualitatively investigated in order to identify the best one to be used in this case study; the combined heat and power (CHP) technology. Two scenarios have been defined and presented: the first with 6 MWt thermal input and 1.2 MWe electrical power as an output and the second with 9 MWt thermal input and 1.8 MWe electrical power as an output. The first scenario showed that 11,000 tons of residual biomass could ensure the annual production of about 34,000 MWht, equal to about the 72% of the requirements, and about 9600 MWhe, equal to approximately 60% of the electricity demand. The second scenario showed that 18,000 tons of the residual biomass could ensure the total annual production of about 56,000 MWht, corresponding to more than 100% of the requirements, and about 14,400 MWhe, equal to approximately 90% of the electricity demand. In addition, the CO 2 emissions from the energy valorization section have been quantified and the possibility of re-using the CO 2 flow in order to produce methane is described.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Cotana & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Valentina Coccia & Alessandro Petrozzi, 2016. "Energy Opportunities from Lignocellulosic Biomass for a Biorefinery Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-10, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:9:p:748-:d:78146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/9/748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/9/748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franco Cotana & Antonio Messineo & Alessandro Petrozzi & Valentina Coccia & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Andrea Aquino, 2014. "Comparison of ORC Turbine and Stirling Engine to Produce Electricity from Gasified Poultry Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2016. "Incorporating social benefits in multi-objective optimization of forest-based bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 721-735.
    3. Patuzzi, Francesco & Prando, Dario & Vakalis, Stergios & Rizzo, Andrea Maria & Chiaramonti, David & Tirler, Werner & Mimmo, Tanja & Gasparella, Andrea & Baratieri, Marco, 2016. "Small-scale biomass gasification CHP systems: Comparative performance assessment and monitoring experiences in South Tyrol (Italy)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 285-293.
    4. Costa, Caliane Bastos Borba & Potrich, Erich & Cruz, Antonio José Gonçalves, 2016. "Multiobjective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery involving process and environmental aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB), pages 1142-1152.
    5. Kudakasseril Kurian, Jiby & Raveendran Nair, Gopu & Hussain, Abid & Vijaya Raghavan, G.S., 2013. "Feedstocks, logistics and pre-treatment processes for sustainable lignocellulosic biorefineries: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 205-219.
    6. Fatih Demirbas, M., 2009. "Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(Supplemen), pages 151-161, November.
    7. Díaz, Guzmán & Moreno, Blanca, 2016. "Valuation under uncertain energy prices and load demands of micro-CHP plants supplemented by optimally switched thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 553-569.
    8. Comodi, Gabriele & Rossi, Mosè, 2016. "Energy versus economic effectiveness in CHP (combined heat and power) applications: Investigation on the critical role of commodities price, taxation and power grid mix efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 124-136.
    9. Baral, Nawa Raj & Wituszynski, David M. & Martin, Jay F. & Shah, Ajay, 2016. "Sustainability assessment of cellulosic biorefinery stillage utilization methods using emergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 13-28.
    10. Gustavsson, Christer & Hulteberg, Christian, 2016. "Co-production of gasification based biofuels in existing combined heat and power plants – Analysis of production capacity and integration potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 830-840.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Manzone & Fabrizio Gioelli & Paolo Balsari, 2017. "Kiwi Clear‐Cut: First Evaluation of Recovered Biomass for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Luigi Pari & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni, 2020. "Herbaceous Oil Crops, a Review on Mechanical Harvesting State of the Art," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Rui Wang & Yanyou Wu & Deke Xing & Hongtao Hang & Xiaolin Xie & Xiuqun Yang & Kaiyan Zhang & Sen Rao, 2017. "Biomass Production of Three Biofuel Energy Plants’ Use of a New Carbon Resource by Carbonic Anhydrase in Simulated Karst Soils: Mechanism and Capacity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Gianluca Cavalaglio & Franco Cotana & Andrea Nicolini & Valentina Coccia & Alessandro Petrozzi & Alessandro Formica & Alessandro Bertini, 2020. "Characterization of Various Biomass Feedstock Suitable for Small-Scale Energy Plants as Preliminary Activity of Biocheaper Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Rukshan Jayathilake & Souman Rudra, 2017. "Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Equivalence Ratio (ER) and Feedstock Particle Size on Birchwood Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Anukam, Anthony & Mamphweli, Sampson & Reddy, Prashant & Meyer, Edson & Okoh, Omobola, 2016. "Pre-processing of sugarcane bagasse for gasification in a downdraft biomass gasifier system: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 775-801.
    3. Aboagye, D. & Banadda, N. & Kiggundu, N. & Kabenge, I., 2017. "Assessment of orange peel waste availability in ghana and potential bio-oil yield using fast pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 814-821.
    4. Bharathiraja, B. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Sudharsanaa, T. & Bharghavi, A. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chakravarthy, M. & Yuvaraj, D., 2017. "Biobutanol – An impending biofuel for future: A review on upstream and downstream processing tecniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 788-807.
    5. Fernand, Francois & Israel, Alvaro & Skjermo, Jorunn & Wichard, Thomas & Timmermans, Klaas R. & Golberg, Alexander, 2017. "Offshore macroalgae biomass for bioenergy production: Environmental aspects, technological achievements and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 35-45.
    6. Sánchez, S. & Lozano, L.J. & Godínez, C. & Juan, D. & Pérez, A. & Hernández, F.J., 2010. "Carob pod as a feedstock for the production of bioethanol in Mediterranean areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3417-3424, November.
    7. McKenna, R. & Bertsch, V. & Mainzer, K. & Fichtner, W., 2018. "Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1092-1110.
    8. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2023. "Optimizing utilization pathways for biomass to chemicals and energy by integrating emergy analysis and particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1448-1459.
    9. Patuzzi, Francesco & Basso, Daniele & Vakalis, Stergios & Antolini, Daniele & Piazzi, Stefano & Benedetti, Vittoria & Cordioli, Eleonora & Baratieri, Marco, 2021. "State-of-the-art of small-scale biomass gasification systems: An extensive and unique monitoring review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Kasivisvanathan, Harresh & Barilea, Ivan Dale U. & Ng, Denny K.S. & Tan, Raymond R., 2013. "Optimal operational adjustment in multi-functional energy systems in response to process inoperability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 492-500.
    11. Akroum-Amrouche, Dahbia & Abdi, Nadia & Lounici, Hakim & Mameri, Nabil, 2011. "Effect of physico-chemical parameters on biohydrogen production and growth characteristics by batch culture of Rhodobacter sphaeroides CIP 60.6," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2130-2135, June.
    12. Leanda C. Garvie & David J. Lee & Biljana Kulišić, 2024. "Towards a Bioeconomy: Supplying Forest Residues for the Australian Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Haroldo Jorge da Silva Ribeiro & Armando Costa Ferreira & Caio Campos Ferreira & Lia Martins Pereira & Marcelo Costa Santos & Lauro Henrique Hamoy Guerreiro & Fernanda Paula da Costa Assunção & Sílvio, 2024. "Depolymerization of PMMA-Based Dental Resin Scraps on Different Production Scales," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-25, March.
    14. de Jong, Sierk & Hoefnagels, Ric & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Pettersson, Karin & Faaij, André & Junginger, Martin, 2017. "Cost optimization of biofuel production – The impact of scale, integration, transport and supply chain configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1055-1070.
    15. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.
    16. Perkins, Greg & Bhaskar, Thallada & Konarova, Muxina, 2018. "Process development status of fast pyrolysis technologies for the manufacture of renewable transport fuels from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 292-315.
    17. Espinoza Pérez, Andrea Teresa & Camargo, Mauricio & Narváez Rincón, Paulo César & Alfaro Marchant, Miguel, 2017. "Key challenges and requirements for sustainable and industrialized biorefinery supply chain design and management: A bibliographic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 350-359.
    18. Theodore Dickerson & Juan Soria, 2013. "Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, January.
    19. Handriyanti Diah Puspitarini & Baptiste François & Marco Baratieri & Casey Brown & Mattia Zaramella & Marco Borga, 2020. "Complementarity between Combined Heat and Power Systems, Solar PV and Hydropower at a District Level: Sensitivity to Climate Characteristics along an Alpine Transect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:9:p:748-:d:78146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.