IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i8p1859-d1375070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Hydrogen-Rich Biofuel Production: Syngas Generation from Wood Chips and Corn Cobs

Author

Listed:
  • Matheus Oliveira

    (FEUP Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

  • Eliseu Monteiro

    (FEUP Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal)

  • Abel Rouboa

    (FEUP Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal
    INEGI—Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, FEUP, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal
    MEAM Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19020, USA)

Abstract

This study investigates gasification using wood chips (WC) and corn cobs (CC) for hydrogen-rich syngas production. A simulation model developed in Aspen Plus was used to evaluate the performance of biomass gasification. The model incorporates a system of Fortran subroutines that automate the definition of input parameters based on the analysis of biomass composition. Furthermore, the model’s equilibrium constants were adjusted based on experimentally measured gas concentrations, increasing the precision of the variations. The numerical results predicted hydrogen yields of 65–120 g/kg biomass, with 60–70% energy efficiency for steam gasification (versus 40–50% for air gasification). The hydrogen concentration ranged from 34% to 40%, with C O (27–11%), C O 2 (9–20%), and C H 4 (<4%). The gasification temperature increased hydrogen production by up to 40% but also increased C O 2 emissions by up to 20%. Higher biomass moisture content promoted hydrogen production by up to 15% but reduced energy efficiency by up to 10% if excessive. Steam gasification with wood chips and corn cobs shows promising potential for hydrogen-rich syngas production, offering benefits such as reduced emissions (up to 30% less C O ) and sustainability by utilizing agricultural residues.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheus Oliveira & Eliseu Monteiro & Abel Rouboa, 2024. "Optimizing Hydrogen-Rich Biofuel Production: Syngas Generation from Wood Chips and Corn Cobs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1859-:d:1375070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/8/1859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svetlana Islamova & Anastasia Tartygasheva & Julia Karaeva & Vladimir Panchenko & Yuriy Litti, 2023. "A Comprehensive Study on the Combustion of Sunflower Husk Pellets by Thermogravimetric and Kinetic Analysis, Kriging Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Umeki, Kentaro & Namioka, Tomoaki & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2012. "Analysis of an updraft biomass gasifier with high temperature steam using a numerical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 38-45.
    3. Marian Wiatowski, 2023. "An Experimental Study on the Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Tar Formed during Ex Situ Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung-Ta Wen & Jau-Huai Lu & Mai-Xuan Phuc, 2021. "Applying Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Composition of Syngas Using Rice Husks: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosting Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    3. Wang, Linzheng & Zhang, Ruizhi & Deng, Ruiqu & Liu, Zeqing & Luo, Yonghao, 2023. "Comprehensive parametric study of fixed-bed co-gasification process through Multiple Thermally Thick Particle (MTTP) model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Michela Costa & Maurizio La Villetta & Daniele Piazzullo & Domenico Cirillo, 2021. "A Phenomenological Model of a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier Flexible to the Feedstock Composition and the Reactor Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Nadia Cerone & Francesco Zimbardi, 2021. "Effects of Oxygen and Steam Equivalence Ratios on Updraft Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Ismail, T.M. & El-Salam, M. Abd, 2015. "Numerical and experimental studies on updraft gasifier HTAG," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 484-497.
    7. Wu, Wei & Wang, Po-Han & Lee, Duu-Jong & Chang, Jo-Shu, 2017. "Global optimization of microalgae-to-biodiesel chains with integrated cogasification combined cycle systems based on greenhouse gas emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 63-82.
    8. Fugang Zhu & Laihong Shen & Pengcheng Xu & Haoran Yuan & Ming Hu & Jingwei Qi & Yong Chen, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of an Improved Updraft Biomass Gasifier Based on Aspen Plus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Zepeng Sun & Yazhuo Wang & Jing Gu & Haoran Yuan & Zejian Liu & Leilei Cheng & Xiang Li & Xian Li, 2023. "CFD Simulation and Experimental Study on a Thermal Energy Storage–Updraft Solid Waste Gasification Device," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-33, June.
    10. Fernando, Niranjan & Narayana, Mahinsasa, 2016. "A comprehensive two dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics model for an updraft biomass gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 698-710.
    11. Chen, Chih-Jung & Hung, Chen-I. & Chen, Wei-Hsin, 2012. "Numerical investigation on performance of coal gasification under various injection patterns in an entrained flow gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 218-228.
    12. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    13. Li, Xian & Kan, Xiang & Sun, Xiangyu & Zhao, Yao & Ge, Tianshu & Dai, Yanjun & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2019. "Performance analysis of a biomass gasification-based CCHP system integrated with variable-effect LiBr-H2O absorption cooling and desiccant dehumidification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 961-979.
    14. Li, Xian & Shen, Ye & Wei, Liping & He, Chao & Lapkin, Alexei A. & Lipiński, Wojciech & Dai, Yanjun & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2020. "Hydrogen production of solar-driven steam gasification of sewage sludge in an indirectly irradiated fluidized-bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    15. Dou, Yuling & Liu, Haiqiang & Liu, Bin & Zhang, Yu & Liu, Yongqiang & Cheng, Xiaozhang & Tao, Changfa, 2021. "Effects of carbon dioxide addition to fuel on flame radiation fraction in propane diffusion flames," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    16. Rutberg, Philip G. & Kuznetsov, Vadim A. & Serba, Evgeny O. & Popov, Sergey D. & Surov, Alexander V. & Nakonechny, Ghennady V. & Nikonov, Alexey V., 2013. "Novel three-phase steam–air plasma torch for gasification of high-caloric waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 505-514.
    17. Lu, Ding & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Ismail, Tamer M. & Abd El-Salam, M., 2018. "Assessment of the carbonized woody briquette gasification in an updraft fixed bed gasifier using the Euler-Euler model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 70-86.
    18. Ferreiro, A.I. & Segurado, R. & Costa, M., 2020. "Modelling soot formation during biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Stanisław Gil & Wojciech Bialik & Piotr Mocek & Miroslav Rimár & Ján Kizek & Nikolas Polivka, 2023. "Investigation of the Kinetics of Pressure Coal Char Hydrogasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Font Palma, Carolina, 2013. "Modelling of tar formation and evolution for biomass gasification: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 129-141.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:1859-:d:1375070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.