IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i6p1394-d1356829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Impact of Clean Coal Technologies on the Share of Coal in Poland’s Energy Mix

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelia Rybak

    (Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Rybak

    (Department of Physical Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Jarosław Joostberens

    (Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Joachim Pielot

    (Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Piotr Toś

    (JSW IT Systems, 44-330 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland)

Abstract

This article presents research results on the share of coal in the energy mix and the impact of clean coal technologies on Poland’s energy mix. Two mathematical models were utilised: the Boltzmann sigmoidal curve and a supervised machine learning model that employs multiple regressions. Eight explanatory variables were incorporated into the model, the influence of which on the explained variable was confirmed by Student’s t -test. The constructed models were verified using ex post errors and the Durbin–Watson and Shapiro–Wilk statistical tests. It was observed that the share of coal in the mix decreased more dynamically after 2015 compared to previous years. Furthermore, a simulation was conducted using the machine learning model, which confirmed the hypothesis on the influence of clean coal technologies on the level of coal share in the Poland energy production structure. As shown by the analysis and simulation, coal could be maintained in the energy mixes of EU countries, and even if the negative aspects of using this fuel were limited—primarily the emission of harmful substances—its share could even increase. It was noted that this share could be higher by 22% assuming a return to the interest in CCT levels from before 2015 and the reduction in CO 2 emissions using membrane techniques proposed by the authors. Clean coal technologies would enable diversification of the energy mix, which is an important aspect of energy security. They would also enable the gradual introduction of renewable energy sources or other energy sources, which would facilitate the transition stage on the way to a sustainable energy mix.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak & Jarosław Joostberens & Joachim Pielot & Piotr Toś, 2024. "Analysis of the Impact of Clean Coal Technologies on the Share of Coal in Poland’s Energy Mix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1394-:d:1356829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1394/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1394/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Agiakloglou & P. Newbold, 1992. "Empirical Evidence On Dickey‐Fuller‐Type Tests," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 471-483, November.
    2. Safi, S. & Zeroual, A. & Hassani, M., 2002. "Prediction of global daily solar radiation using higher order statistics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 647-666.
    3. Blaschke, Wieslaw & Nycz, Ryszard, 2003. "Clean coal-preparation barriers in Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(3-4), pages 343-348, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak & Spas D. Kolev, 2023. "Modeling the Photovoltaic Power Generation in Poland in the Light of PEP2040: An Application of Multiple Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Pedersen, Thomas Quistgaard & Schütte, Erik Christian Montes, 2020. "Testing for explosive bubbles in the presence of autocorrelated innovations," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 207-225.
    3. Alastair Hall, 1995. "Residual Autocovariances And Unit Root Tests Based On Instrumental Variable Estimators From Time Series Regression Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(6), pages 555-569, November.
    4. Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak & Jarosław Joostberens & Spas D. Kolev, 2022. "Cluster Analysis of the EU-27 Countries in Light of the Guiding Principles of the European Green Deal, with Particular Emphasis on Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Müller, Alfred & Reuber, Matthias, 2023. "A copula-based time series model for global horizontal irradiation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 869-883.
    6. Almorox, J. & Benito, M. & Hontoria, C., 2005. "Estimation of monthly Angström–Prescott equation coefficients from measured daily data in Toledo, Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 931-936.
    7. Consuelo Arellano & Sastry G. Pantula, 1995. "Testing For Trend Stationarity Versus Difference Stationarity," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 147-164, March.
    8. Shubham Gupta & Amit Kumar Singh & Sachin Mishra & Pradeep Vishnuram & Nagaraju Dharavat & Narayanamoorthi Rajamanickam & Ch. Naga Sai Kalyan & Kareem M. AboRas & Naveen Kumar Sharma & Mohit Bajaj, 2023. "Estimation of Solar Radiation with Consideration of Terrestrial Losses at a Selected Location—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    9. Li, Yanting & Su, Yan & Shu, Lianjie, 2014. "An ARMAX model for forecasting the power output of a grid connected photovoltaic system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 78-89.
    10. Paschen, Marius, 2016. "Dynamic analysis of the German day-ahead electricity spot market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 118-128.
    11. Jebaraj, S. & Iniyan, S., 2006. "A review of energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 281-311, August.
    12. Antonello Rosato & Rosa Altilio & Rodolfo Araneo & Massimo Panella, 2017. "Prediction in Photovoltaic Power by Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Agiakloglou, Christos & Deligiannakis, Emmanouil, 2020. "Sovereign risk evaluation for European Union countries," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Mohanty, Sthitapragyan & Patra, Prashanta Kumar & Sahoo, Sudhansu Sekhar, 2016. "Prediction and application of solar radiation with soft computing over traditional and conventional approach – A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 778-796.
    15. repec:sek:ibmpro:3004657 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Yin‐Wong Cheung & Kon S. Lai, 1995. "Estimating Finite Sample Critical Values For Unit Root Tests Using Pure Random Walk Processes:A Note," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 493-498, September.
    17. Chen, S.X. & Gooi, H.B. & Wang, M.Q., 2013. "Solar radiation forecast based on fuzzy logic and neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 195-201.
    18. Fernandez-Jimenez, L. Alfredo & Muñoz-Jimenez, Andrés & Falces, Alberto & Mendoza-Villena, Montserrat & Garcia-Garrido, Eduardo & Lara-Santillan, Pedro M. & Zorzano-Alba, Enrique & Zorzano-Santamaria,, 2012. "Short-term power forecasting system for photovoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 311-317.
    19. Hu Yin & Menghan Si & Qian Li & Jinke Zhang & Liming Dai, 2019. "Kick Risk Forecasting and Evaluating During Drilling Based on Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1394-:d:1356829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.