IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i3p648-d1329228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Reliability and Optimizing Input Parameters of the NWP-CFD Downscaling Method for Generating Onshore Wind Energy Resource Maps of South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jeonghyeon Kim

    (Mechanical & Automotive Engineering Department, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hyungoo Moon

    (Mechanical & Automotive Engineering Department, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jin-Yong Kim

    (Renewable Energy Big Data Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea)

  • Keon Hoon Kim

    (Renewable Energy Big Data Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyun-Goo Kim

    (Korea Institute of Energy Research, Wind Energy Research Center, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea)

  • Sung Goon Park

    (Mechanical & Automotive Engineering Department, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The numerical weather prediction (NWP) method is one of the popular wind resource forecasting methods, but it has the limitation that it does not consider the influence of local topography. The NWP-CFD downscaling considers topographic features and surface roughness by performing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with the meteorological data obtained by the NWP method as a boundary condition. The NWP-CFD downscaling is expected to be suitable for wind resource forecasting in Korea, but it lacks a quantitative evaluation of its reliability. In this study, we compare the actual measured data, the NWP-based data, and the NWP-CFD-based data quantitatively and analyze the three main input parameters used for the calculation of NWP-CFD (minimum vertical grid size Δ z min , the difference angle Δ dir , and the forest model activation reference length l 0 ). Compared to the actual measurement data, the NWP-based data overestimate wind resources by more than 35%, while the NWP-CFD-based data show an error of about 8.5%. The Δ z min and Δ dir have little effect on the results, but the l 0 has a large effect on the simulation results, and it is necessary to adjust the values appropriately corresponding to the characteristics of an area.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeonghyeon Kim & Hyungoo Moon & Jin-Yong Kim & Keon Hoon Kim & Hyun-Goo Kim & Sung Goon Park, 2024. "Assessing the Reliability and Optimizing Input Parameters of the NWP-CFD Downscaling Method for Generating Onshore Wind Energy Resource Maps of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:648-:d:1329228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/3/648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Gualtieri, 2021. "Reliability of ERA5 Reanalysis Data for Wind Resource Assessment: A Comparison against Tall Towers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gangopadhyay, A. & Seshadri, A.K. & Sparks, N.J. & Toumi, R., 2022. "The role of wind-solar hybrid plants in mitigating renewable energy-droughts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 926-937.
    2. James M. Wilczak & Elena Akish & Antonietta Capotondi & Gilbert P. Compo, 2024. "Evaluation and Bias Correction of the ERA5 Reanalysis over the United States for Wind and Solar Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, March.
    3. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Yang, Jaemo & Sengupta, Manajit & Xie, Yu & Shin, Hyeyum Hailey, 2023. "Developing a 20-year high-resolution wind data set for Puerto Rico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    5. Luis Arribas & Yolanda Lechón & Alberto Perula & Javier Domínguez & Manuel Ferres & Jorge Navarro & Luis F. Zarzalejo & Carolina García Barquero & Ignacio Cruz, 2021. "Review of Data and Data Sources for the Assessment of the Potential of Utility-Scale Hybrid Wind–Solar PV Power Plants Deployment, under a Microgrid Scope," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    6. de Aquino Ferreira, Saulo Custodio & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & Maçaira, Paula Medina, 2022. "Validation of the representativeness of wind speed time series obtained from reanalysis data for Brazilian territory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. Gangopadhyay, Anasuya & Seshadri, Ashwin K. & Patil, Balachandra, 2024. "Wind-solar-storage trade-offs in a decarbonizing electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    8. Gil Ruiz, Samuel Andrés & Cañón Barriga, Julio Eduardo & Martínez, J. Alejandro, 2022. "Assessment and validation of wind power potential at convection-permitting resolution for the Caribbean region of Colombia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    9. Rogeau, Antoine & Vieubled, Julien & de Coatpont, Matthieu & Affonso Nobrega, Pedro & Erbs, Guillaume & Girard, Robin, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation and resource assessment of hydrogen production through offshore wind farms: A European perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2023. "Introducing a new wind speed complementarity model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. Hamza S. Abdalla Lagili & Aşkın Kiraz & Youssef Kassem & Hüseyin Gökçekuş, 2023. "Wind and Solar Energy for Sustainable Energy Production for Family Farms in Coastal Agricultural Regions of Libya Using Measured and Multiple Satellite Datasets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-53, September.
    12. Yang, Xinrong & Jiang, Xin & Liang, Shijing & Qin, Yingzuo & Ye, Fan & Ye, Bin & Xu, Jiayu & He, Xinyue & Wu, Jie & Dong, Tianyun & Cai, Xitian & Xu, Rongrong & Zeng, Zhenzhong, 2024. "Spatiotemporal variation of power law exponent on the use of wind energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    13. P Patel, Ravi & Nagababu, Garlapati & Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh & V V Arun Kumar, Surisetty & M, Seemanth, 2022. "Combined wind and wave resource assessment and energy extraction along the Indian coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 931-945.
    14. Shafiqur Rehman & Kashif Irshad & Nasiru I. Ibrahim & Ali AlShaikhi & Mohamed A. Mohandes, 2023. "Offshore Wind Power Resource Assessment in the Gulf of North Suez," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:648-:d:1329228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.