IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v187y2023ics1364032123005567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic evaluation and resource assessment of hydrogen production through offshore wind farms: A European perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Rogeau, Antoine
  • Vieubled, Julien
  • de Coatpont, Matthieu
  • Affonso Nobrega, Pedro
  • Erbs, Guillaume
  • Girard, Robin

Abstract

The demand for hydrogen is expected to increase radically in the coming years, as it is an important lever for decarbonization and offshore wind is a credible option for running electrolyzers. A unified and detailed cost modeling is produced from the sparse literature that considers a variety of configurations (onshore, centralized offshore, and decentralized offshore electrolysis). A resource assessment at European scale is performed by combining the developed cost modeling with a geospatial analysis considering the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH). Geolocated power generation as well as technical and environmental constraints are considered to improve the assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogeau, Antoine & Vieubled, Julien & de Coatpont, Matthieu & Affonso Nobrega, Pedro & Erbs, Guillaume & Girard, Robin, 2023. "Techno-economic evaluation and resource assessment of hydrogen production through offshore wind farms: A European perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123005567
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123005567
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:187:y:2023:i:c:s1364032123005567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.