IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i11p4455-d1160936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large-Scale Experimental Simulations of In Situ Coal Gasification in Terms of Process Efficiency and Physicochemical Properties of Process By-Products

Author

Listed:
  • Marian Wiatowski

    (Central Mining Institute, Department of Energy Saving and Air Protection, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Kapusta

    (Central Mining Institute, Department of Energy Saving and Air Protection, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Strugała-Wilczek

    (Central Mining Institute, Department of Energy Saving and Air Protection, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Stańczyk

    (Central Mining Institute, Department of Energy Saving and Air Protection, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland)

  • Alberto Castro-Muñiz

    (Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, INCAR-CSIC, C/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Fabián Suárez-García

    (Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, INCAR-CSIC, C/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Juan Ignacio Paredes

    (Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, INCAR-CSIC, C/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

Abstract

This paper presents a series of surface experiments simulating underground coal gasification (UCG). The main goal of the experiments was to investigate the influence of the gasification medium and the coal rank on the gasification process. Four multi-day trials were carried out using a laboratory gasification facility designed for the large-scale experimental simulations of UCG and located in the Experimental Mine “Barbara”, located at Mikołów, Poland. Two Polish bituminous coals were investigated: coal sourced from “Piast-Ziemowit” mine and coal sourced from “Wesoła” mine. Each of the two coals was gasified in two separate experiments using oxygen-enriched air (OEA) and pure oxygen as the respective gasifying agents. Gasification with oxygen resulted in significantly higher gas quality and higher process efficiency than gasification with OEA. Higher concentrations of hydrogen (23.2% and 25.5%) and carbon monoxide (31.8% and 33.4%) were obtained when oxygen was used as a gasifying reagent, while lower concentrations were obtained in the case of gasification with OEA (7.1% and 9.5% of hydrogen; 6.4% and 19.7% of carbon monoxide). Average gas calorific values were 7.96 MJ/Nm 3 and 9.14 MJ/Nm 3 for the oxygen experiments, compared to 2.25 MJ/Nm 3 and 3.44 MJ/Nm 3 for the OEA experiments (“Piast-Ziemowit” coal and “Wesoła” coal, respectively). The higher coalification degree of “Wesoła” coal (82.01% of carbon) compared to the “Piast-Ziemowit” coal (68.62% of carbon) definitely improves the gas quality and energy efficiency of the process. The rate of water condensate production was higher for the oxygen gasification process (5.01 kg/h and 3.63 kg/h) compared to the OEA gasification process (4.18 kg/h and 2.63 kg/h, respectively), regardless of the type of gasified coal. Additionally, the textural characteristics (porosity development) of the chars remaining after coal gasification experiments were analyzed. A noticeable development of pores larger than 0.7 nm was only observed for the less coalified “Piast-Ziemowit” coal when analyzed under the more reactive atmosphere of oxygen.

Suggested Citation

  • Marian Wiatowski & Krzysztof Kapusta & Aleksandra Strugała-Wilczek & Krzysztof Stańczyk & Alberto Castro-Muñiz & Fabián Suárez-García & Juan Ignacio Paredes, 2023. "Large-Scale Experimental Simulations of In Situ Coal Gasification in Terms of Process Efficiency and Physicochemical Properties of Process By-Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4455-:d:1160936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Y. Klimenko, 2009. "Early Ideas in Underground Coal Gasification and Their Evolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Jiang, Liangliang & Chen, Zhangxin & Farouq Ali, S.M., 2019. "Feasibility of carbon dioxide storage in post-burn underground coal gasification cavities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Karol Kostúr & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdan, 2018. "Some Influences of Underground Coal Gasification on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Lahijani, Pooya & Zainal, Zainal Alimuddin & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2015. "Conversion of the greenhouse gas CO2 to the fuel gas CO via the Boudouard reaction: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 615-632.
    5. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2020. "Synthesis Gas Composition Prediction for Underground Coal Gasification Using a Thermochemical Equilibrium Modeling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuxia Yuan & Wanwan Jiao & Chuangye Wang & Song Wu & Qibin Jiang, 2024. "Simulation of Underground Coal-Gasification Process Using Aspen Plus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milan Durdán & Marta Benková & Marek Laciak & Ján Kačur & Patrik Flegner, 2021. "Regression Models Utilization to the Underground Temperature Determination at Coal Energy Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    4. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Saulov, Dmitry N. & Plumb, Ovid A. & Klimenko, A.Y., 2010. "Flame propagation in a gasification channel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1264-1273.
    6. Yao, Xiwen & Liu, Qinghua & Kang, Zijian & An, Zhixing & Zhou, Haodong & Xu, Kaili, 2023. "Quantitative study on thermal conversion behaviours and gas emission properties of biomass in nitrogen and in CO2/N2 mixtures by TGA/DTG and a fixed-bed tube furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Stefania Lucantonio & Andrea Di Giuliano & Leucio Rossi & Katia Gallucci, 2023. "Green Diesel Production via Deoxygenation Process: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-44, January.
    8. Janusz Zdeb & Natalia Howaniec & Adam Smoliński, 2019. "Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in Coal Gasification—An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Du, Hong & Ma, Xiuyun & Jiang, Miao & Yan, Peifang & Zhang, Z.Conrad, 2021. "Autocatalytic co-upgrading of biochar and pyrolysis gas to syngas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    10. Yang, Xiaoxia & Gu, Shengshen & Kheradmand, Amanj & Kan, Tao & He, Jing & Strezov, Vladimir & Zou, Ruiping & Yu, Aibing & Jiang, Yijiao, 2022. "Tunable syngas production from biomass: Synergistic effect of steam, Ni–CaO catalyst, and biochar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    11. Krzysztof Skrzypkowski & Krzysztof Zagórski & Anna Zagórska, 2021. "Determination of the Extent of the Rock Destruction Zones around a Gasification Channel on the Basis of Strength Tests of Sandstone and Claystone Samples Heated at High Temperatures up to 1200 °C and ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Yuchiao Lu & Hanmin Yang & Andrey V. Karasev & Chuan Wang & Pär G. Jönsson, 2022. "Applications of Hydrochar and Charcoal in the Iron and Steelmaking Industry—Part 1: Characterization of Carbonaceous Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, August.
    13. Cai, Weizi & Zhou, Qian & Xie, Yongmin & Liu, Jiang & Long, Guohui & Cheng, Shuang & Liu, Meilin, 2016. "A direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell operated on a plant derived biofuel with natural catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1232-1241.
    14. Feng, Lele & Zhou, Sibo & Xu, Xiangcen & Qin, Botao, 2022. "Importance evaluation for influencing factors of underground coal gasification through ex-situ experiment and analytic hierarchy process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    15. Gayatri Udaysinh Ingale & Hyun-Min Kwon & Soohwa Jeong & Dongho Park & Whidong Kim & Byeingryeol Bang & Young-Il Lim & Sung Won Kim & Youn-Bae Kang & Jungsoo Mun & Sunwoo Jun & Uendo Lee, 2022. "Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Production Processes: Turquoise Hydrogen vs. Steam Methane Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Md M. Khan & Joseph P. Mmbaga & Ahad S. Shirazi & Japan Trivedi & Qingzia Liu & Rajender Gupta, 2015. "Modelling Underground Coal Gasification—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-66, November.
    17. Ritchie, Justin & Dowlatabadi, Hadi, 2017. "The 1000 GtC coal question: Are cases of vastly expanded future coal combustion still plausible?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 16-31.
    18. Xin, Lin & An, Mingyu & Feng, Mingze & Li, Kaixuan & Cheng, Weimin & Liu, Weitao & Hu, Xiangming & Wang, Zhigang & Han, Limin, 2021. "Study on pyrolysis characteristics of lump coal in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    19. Vikram, Shruti & Rosha, Pali & Kumar, Sandeep & Mahajani, Sanjay, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and parametric optimization of steam-CO2 based biomass gasification system using Aspen PLUS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    20. Lee, Dong-Jun & Jung, Sungyup & Jeong, Kwang-Hwa & Lee, Dong-Hyun & Lee, Sung-Hyoun & Park, Young-Kwon & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2020. "Catalytic pyrolysis of cow manure over a Ni/SiO2 catalyst using CO2 as a reaction medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4455-:d:1160936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.