IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p2979-d796976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic Optimization of Low-Temperature Cycles for the Power Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Kindra

    (Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Nikolay Rogalev

    (Department of Thermal Power Plants, National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey Rogalev

    (Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Vladimir Naumov

    (Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Sabanova

    (Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”, 111250 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The fuel price increase and severe environmental regulations determine energy-saving importance. Useful utilization of low-potential heat sources with 300–400 °С temperature becomes topical. The application of low-temperature power production facilities operating low-boiling heat carriers could be a solution to this problem. A comparative parametric study of a number of heat carriers resulted in a choice of the most promising fluids that are not expensive, have low toxicity and flammability, low ozone depletion and low global warming potential. These heat carriers are considered for application in simple power production cycles with and without regeneration. The main parameters were optimized at the initial temperatures of 323.15–623.15 K. The cycle without regeneration has a maximal net efficiency of 29.34% using the water at an initial temperature of 623.15 K. The regenerative cycle at a temperature below 490 K has its maximal efficiency using a water heat carrier, and at a higher temperature above 490 K with R236ea. The cycle with R236ea at 623.15 K has an electrical net efficiency of 33.30%. Using a water heat carrier, the maximal efficiency can be reached at pressures below 5 MPa for both cycles. Among the organic heat carriers, the minimal optimal initial pressure of a simple cycle is reached with the R236ea heat carrier below 45 MPa without regeneration and below 15 MPa with regeneration. Therefore when utilizing the latent heat with temperatures above 500 K R134a, R236ea and R124 are the most promising organic fluids. Such conditions could be obtained using different industrial sources with water condensation at elevated pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Kindra & Nikolay Rogalev & Andrey Rogalev & Vladimir Naumov & Ekaterina Sabanova, 2022. "Thermodynamic Optimization of Low-Temperature Cycles for the Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:2979-:d:796976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/2979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/2979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saleh, Bahaa & Koglbauer, Gerald & Wendland, Martin & Fischer, Johann, 2007. "Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1210-1221.
    2. Nikolay Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Ivan Komarov & Sergey Osipov & Olga Zlyvko & Dmitrii Lvov, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Low-Grade Heat Utilization Methods for Thermal Power Plants with Back-Pressure Steam Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    4. Andrey Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Ivan Komarov & Sergey Osipov & Olga Zlyvko, 2021. "Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Goswami, Rohtash & Das, Ranjan, 2020. "Waste heat recovery from a biomass heat engine for thermoelectric power generation using two-phase thermosyphons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1280-1291.
    6. Andrey Rogalev & Nikolay Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Olga Zlyvko & Andrey Vegera, 2021. "A Study of Low-Potential Heat Utilization Methods for Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Andrey Rogalev & Nikolay Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Ivan Komarov & Olga Zlyvko, 2021. "Research and Development of the Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles with CO 2 Recirculation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    2. Luo, Xianglong & Wang, Yupeng & Liang, Junwei & Qi, Ji & Su, Wen & Yang, Zhi & Chen, Jianyong & Wang, Chao & Chen, Ying, 2019. "Improved correlations for working fluid properties prediction and their application in performance evaluation of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 122-137.
    3. Larsen, Ulrik & Pierobon, Leonardo & Haglind, Fredrik & Gabrielii, Cecilia, 2013. "Design and optimisation of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in marine applications using the principles of natural selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 803-812.
    4. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    5. Roberto Pili & Hartmut Spliethoff & Christoph Wieland, 2017. "Dynamic Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle—Detailed Model of a Kettle Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Subiantoro, Alison & Ooi, Kim Tiow, 2014. "Comparison and performance analysis of the novel revolving vane expander design variants in low and medium pressure applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 747-757.
    7. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    8. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    9. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    10. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    11. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    12. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    13. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Schampheleire, S. & De Paepe, M., 2013. "Part load based thermo-economic optimization of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applied to a combined heat and power (CHP) system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 871-881.
    14. Domingues, António & Santos, Helder & Costa, Mário, 2013. "Analysis of vehicle exhaust waste heat recovery potential using a Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 71-85.
    15. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    16. Miroslav Variny, 2022. "Comment on Rogalev et al. Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia. Energies 2021, 14 , 7136," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-5, February.
    17. Juan A. White & Santiago Velasco, 2019. "Approximating the Temperature–Entropy Saturation Curve of ORC Working Fluids From the Ideal Gas Isobaric Heat Capacity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Zhao, Y. & Fan, B.Y. & Wu, Y.T. & Mu, Q.H., 2012. "Performance analysis of a novel system combining a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with a gasoline engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 385-395.
    19. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    20. Liu, Chao & He, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2013. "The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 144-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:2979-:d:796976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.