IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i23p8819-d981026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers as Lower Carbon Footprint Alternatives to Portland Cement for Well Cementing Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Horan

    (Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Moneeb Genedy

    (Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Maria Juenger

    (Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Eric van Oort

    (Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

Abstract

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is currently the preferred material for the creation of barriers in wells during their construction and abandonment globally. OPC, however, is a very carbon-intensive material with some inherent technical weaknesses. These include a low casing-to-cement bond strength which may allow for the formation of micro-annuli, which in turn can become a conduit for greenhouse gas transport (primarily of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas) to surface. Alkali-activated materials (AAMs), also known as geopolymers, have a much lower manufacturing carbon footprint than OPC and can be a good alternative to OPC for primary and remedial well cementing applications. This paper reports on a comprehensive study into the use of Class F fly ash-based geopolymers for a large variety of downhole well conditions, ranging from lower-temperature surface and intermediate casing cementing conditions to much higher temperature conditions (up to 204 °C (400 °F)) that can be encountered in high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) wells and geothermal wells. The rheological and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash with six different sodium and potassium-based hydroxide and silicate activators were measured and compared to OPC. The results show that geopolymer formulation properties can be tuned to a variety of downhole cementing conditions. With the application of a suitable alkaline activator, geopolymers exhibit good compressive and tensile strength and an outstanding casing-to-cement bond strength of up to 8.8 MPa (1283 psi), which is more than an order of magnitude higher than OPC. This has important implications for preventing the creation of micro-annuli as a result of casing-to-cement interface debonding, thereby preventing the potential leakage of methane to the atmosphere on future wells that use geopolymers rather than OPC for barrier creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Horan & Moneeb Genedy & Maria Juenger & Eric van Oort, 2022. "Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers as Lower Carbon Footprint Alternatives to Portland Cement for Well Cementing Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8819-:d:981026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/8819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kang, Mary & Mauzerall, Denise L. & Ma, Daniel Z. & Celia, Michael A., 2019. "Reducing methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells: Strategies and costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 594-601.
    2. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2016. "Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 850-866.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    2. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & Parkinson, Brett & Hellgardt, Klaus & Shah, Nilay & Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Uncovering the true cost of hydrogen production routes using life cycle monetisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    3. Yoon, Kwangsuk & Lee, Sang Soo & Ok, Yong Sik & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Song, Hocheol, 2019. "Enhancement of syngas for H2 production via catalytic pyrolysis of orange peel using CO2 and bauxite residue," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    4. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła & Radosław Tarkowski, 2022. "Prospects for the Implementation of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Felix T. Haase & Arno Bergmann & Travis E. Jones & Janis Timoshenko & Antonia Herzog & Hyo Sang Jeon & Clara Rettenmaier & Beatriz Roldan Cuenya, 2022. "Size effects and active state formation of cobalt oxide nanoparticles during the oxygen evolution reaction," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 765-773, August.
    6. Mostafa Ahmed & Mohamed Abdelrahem & Ibrahim Harbi & Ralph Kennel, 2020. "An Adaptive Model-Based MPPT Technique with Drift-Avoidance for Grid-Connected PV Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Qolipour, Mojtaba & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Tousi, Omid Mohseni, 2017. "Techno-economic feasibility of a photovoltaic-wind power plant construction for electric and hydrogen production: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 113-123.
    8. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Pastor-Pérez, Laura & Zhang, Zhien & Reina, T.R., 2020. "Stepping towards a low-carbon economy. Formic acid from biogas as case of study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Boreum & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Projected cost analysis of hybrid methanol production from tri-reforming of methane integrated with various water electrolysis systems: Technical and economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Farboud Khatami & Erfan Goharian, 2022. "Beyond Profitable Shifts to Green Energies, towards Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Teixeira, Fátima C. & Teixeira, António P.S. & Rangel, C.M., 2022. "New proton conductive membranes of indazole- and condensed pyrazolebisphosphonic acid-Nafion membranes for PEMFC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1187-1196.
    13. Olabi, A.G. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2021. "Fuel cell application in the automotive industry and future perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Jahangiri, Mehdi & Rezaei, Mostafa & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Goojani, Afsaneh Raiesi & Saghaei, Hamed & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin, 2022. "Prioritization of solar electricity and hydrogen co-production stations considering PV losses and different types of solar trackers: A TOPSIS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 889-903.
    15. Zaffar Ahmed Shaikh & Polina Datsyuk & Laura M. Baitenova & Larisa Belinskaja & Natalia Ivolgina & Gulmira Rysmakhanova & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2022. "Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Renewable Energy Firm’s Profitability and Capitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Zhu, Min & Chen, Shiyi & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Hu, Jun & Sun, Zhao & Ma, Shiwei & Xiang, Wenguo, 2018. "Effects of supports on reduction activity and carbon deposition of iron oxide for methane chemical looping hydrogen generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 912-921.
    17. Malik, Ritu & Tomer, Vijay K., 2021. "State-of-the-art review of morphological advancements in graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN) for sustainable hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Lee, Boreum & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of H2 energy storage system based on renewable energy certificate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 91-98.
    19. Min Wang & Xiaobin Dong & Youchun Zhai, 2021. "Optimal Configuration of the Integrated Charging Station for PV and Hydrogen Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, October.
    20. Ye, Yang & Yue, Yi & Lu, Jianfeng & Ding, Jing & Wang, Weilong & Yan, Jinyue, 2021. "Enhanced hydrogen storage of a LaNi5 based reactor by using phase change materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 734-743.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:8819-:d:981026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.