IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i15p5758-d883278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Energy Conditions in Sustainable Regional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Brygida Klemens

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Opole University of Technology, 45-036 Opole, Poland)

  • Brygida Solga

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Opole University of Technology, 45-036 Opole, Poland)

  • Krystian Heffner

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

  • Piotr Gibas

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Climate change is taking place on a global scale and it is substantially affected by human activity, including increasing greenhouse gas emissions. One of the thematic objectives of EU’s new financial objective is a more environmentally friendly low-emission Europe that promotes clean and fair energy transformation, green investments, and a circular economy, among others. The Polish economy is mainly based on energy production from conventional sources (fossil fuels). Considering that the demand for electricity in Poland is predicted to increase by as much as 50% until 2040, it is necessary to take action aimed at increasing the share of renewable energy sources. The subject of analysis is the Opolskie Voivodeship (a NUTS 2 type region), the capital of which features the biggest Polish coal power plant. In 2014–2019, it was expanded by two units with 1800 MW in total capacity, thereby indicating that investments in energy obtained from conventional sources are still implemented and to a large extent at that (the expansion has been the biggest infrastructural investment in Poland since 1989). The Opolskie region is characterised by substantial excess in acceptable environmental burden (dust pollution, among others). The aim of the paper is to evaluate the key environmental conditions for the Opolskie region’s development in terms of the assumptions of the domestic and EU energy policies. The Opolskie region’s developmental challenges in the environmental area were determined on the basis of selected indicator estimations up to 2030. The research hypothesis assumes that the environmental conditions for the Opolskie region’s development are unfavourable. The methodological part features an analysis of the cause and effect dependencies in the “environment” area, which enabled an assessment of the Opolskie Voivodeship’s current situation as well as an analysis of the dependencies relevant to the region’s development. This was followed by an estimation of selected indicators in the “environment” area until 2030, which allowed for an assessment of their probable levels and thereby a specification of the region’s development conditions. The estimation was conducted using the data available in public statistics, i.e., Statistics Poland’s data. The indicators estimated for 2030 were presented using three forecasting methods: (a) the monotonic trend, (b) the yearly average change rate, and (c) the logarithmic trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Brygida Klemens & Brygida Solga & Krystian Heffner & Piotr Gibas, 2022. "Environmental and Energy Conditions in Sustainable Regional Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5758-:d:883278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5758/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/15/5758/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcela Taušová & Katarína Čulková & Peter Tauš & Lucia Domaracká & Andrea Seňová, 2021. "Evaluation of the Effective Material Use from the View of EU Environmental Policy Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Śnieżyk & Tomasz Pilewicz & Małgorzata Godlewska, 2021. "Bottom-Up Initiatives Undertaken by Local Governments to Support Entrepreneurship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Carmen Elena Stoenoiu, 2022. "Sustainable Development—A Path to a Better Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. David Pearce & Edward B. Barbier & Anil Markandya, 1990. "Sustainable Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 352.
    5. Karmen Margeta & Zvonimir Glasnovic & Nataša Zabukovec Logar & Sanja Tišma & Anamarija Farkaš, 2022. "A Concept for Solving the Sustainability of Cities Worldwide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Stephanie Rodriguez-Besteiro & Juan José Cabello-Eras & Alvaro Bustamante-Sanchez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Macarena Donoso-Gonzalez & Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco & J, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & David Popp, 2010. "Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(1), pages 133-155, January.
    8. Romuald Jończy & Przemysław Śleszyński & Alicja Dolińska & Michał Ptak & Justyna Rokitowska-Malcher & Diana Rokita-Poskart, 2021. "Environmental and Economic Factors of Migration from Urban to Rural Areas: Evidence from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Herlander Mata-Lima & Deborah Wollmann Silva & Deborah Cristina Nardi & Samanta Andrize Klering & Thays Car Feliciano de Oliveira & Fernando Morgado-Dias, 2021. "Waste-to-Energy: An Opportunity to Increase Renewable Energy Share and Reduce Ecological Footprint in Small Island Developing States (SIDS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Fahimul Hoque & Ruhizan M. Yasin & Kamaruzzaman Sopian, 2022. "Revisiting Education for Sustainable Development: Methods to Inspire Secondary School Students toward Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Ayres, Robert U., 2004. "On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economics diverge," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 425-438, April.
    12. Wojciech Drożdż & Oliwia Mróz-Malik & Marcin Kopiczko, 2021. "The Future of the Polish Energy Mix in the Context of Social Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Diana Rokita-Poskart & Łukasz Mach, 2019. "Selected Meso-Economic Consequences of the Changing Number of Students in Academic Towns and Cities (A Case Study of Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Nicole Betz & John D. Coley, 2022. "Human Exceptionalist Thinking about Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Elena Širá & Roman Vavrek & Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2020. "Knowledge Economy Indicators and Their Impact on the Sustainable Competitiveness of the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Ana Mª Estable-Reifs & Homero Pellicer, 2021. "Toward the Renewal of the Sustainable Urban Indicators’ System after a Global Health Crisis. Practical Application in Granada, Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, September.
    17. van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. & Verbruggen, Harmen, 1999. "Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the 'ecological footprint'," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 61-72, April.
    18. Sueli Giorgetta, 2002. "The Right to a Healthy Environment, Human Rights andSustainable Development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 171-192, June.
    19. Krystian Heffner & Brygida Klemens & Brygida Solga, 2019. "Challenges of Regional Development in the Context of Population Ageing. Analysis Based on the Example of Opolskie Voivodeship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Michael C. Carroll & James Ronald Stanfield, 2001. "Sustainable Regional Economic Development," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 469-476, June.
    21. Suo, C. & Li, Y.P. & Mei, H. & Lv, J. & Sun, J. & Nie, S., 2021. "Towards sustainability for China's energy system through developing an energy-climate-water nexus model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    22. Małgorzata Niklewicz-Pijaczyńska & Elżbieta Stańczyk & Anna Gardocka-Jałowiec & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Agata Niemczyk & Katarzyna Szalonka & Magdalena Homa, 2021. "A Strategy for Planned Product Aging in View of Sustainable Development Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    23. Peter Roberts, 2006. "Evaluating regional sustainable development: Approaches, methods and the politics of analysis," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 515-532.
    24. Müller, Matthias Otto & Stämpfli, Adrian & Dold, Ursula & Hammer, Thomas, 2011. "Energy autarky: A conceptual framework for sustainable regional development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 5800-5810, October.
    25. Łukasz Mach & Karina Bedrunka & Ireneusz Dąbrowski & Paweł Frącz, 2021. "The Relationship between ROP Funds and Sustainable Development—A Case Study for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    26. Joanna Boguniewicz-Zabłocka & Ewelina Łukasiewicz & Domenico Guida, 2019. "Analysis of the Sustainable Use of Geothermal Waters and Future Development Possibilities—A Case Study from the Opole Region, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    27. Iga Solecka & Dietmar Bothmer & Arkadiusz Głogowski, 2019. "Recognizing Landscapes for the Purpose of Sustainable Development—Experiences from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    28. Seyedeh Narjes Fallah & Ravinesh Chand Deo & Mohammad Shojafar & Mauro Conti & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2018. "Computational Intelligence Approaches for Energy Load Forecasting in Smart Energy Management Grids: State of the Art, Future Challenges, and Research Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-31, March.
    29. Barbier, Edward B & Markandya, Anil & Pearce, David W, 1990. "Sustainable Agricultural Development and Project Appraisal," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 17(2), pages 181-196.
    30. Ines Würth & Laura Valldecabres & Elliot Simon & Corinna Möhrlen & Bahri Uzunoğlu & Ciaran Gilbert & Gregor Giebel & David Schlipf & Anton Kaifel, 2019. "Minute-Scale Forecasting of Wind Power—Results from the Collaborative Workshop of IEA Wind Task 32 and 36," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-30, February.
    31. Adam Wąs & Vitaliy Krupin & Paweł Kobus & Jan Witajewski-Baltvilks & Robert Jeszke & Krystian Szczepański, 2021. "Towards Climate Neutrality in Poland by 2050: Assessment of Policy Implications in the Farm Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    32. Kahia, Montassar & Ben Aïssa, Mohamed Safouane & Charfeddine, Lanouar, 2016. "Impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth: New evidence from the MENA Net Oil Exporting Countries (NOECs)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 102-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergey Zhironkin & Michal Cehlár, 2022. "Green Economy and Sustainable Development: The Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-8, February.
    2. Clement Bonnet & Samuel Carcanague & Emmanuel Hache & Gondia Seck & Marine Simoën, 2019. "Vers une Géopolitique de l'énergie plus complexe ? Une analyse prospective tridimensionnelle de la transition énergétique," Working Papers hal-02971706, HAL.
    3. Aleksandra Zygmunt, 2020. "Do Human Resources and the Research System Affect Firms’ Innovation Activities? Results from Poland and the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Aurelia Rybak & Aleksandra Rybak & Spas D. Kolev, 2021. "Analysis of the EU-27 Countries Energy Markets Integration in Terms of the Sustainable Development SDG7 Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Emmanuel Hache & Samuel Carcanague & Clément Bonnet & Gondia Sokhna Seck & Marine Simoën, 2019. "Some geopolitical issues of the energy transition," Working Papers hal-03101697, HAL.
    6. Brygida Klemens, 2020. "Economic Development through Clusters-Understanding the Idea of Cooperation in the Opinion of Students: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 558-570.
    7. Karina Bedrunka & Łukasz Mach & Anna Kuczuk & Anna Bohdan, 2021. "Identification and Analysis of Structural Fund Support Mitigating the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the EU—A Case Study of Health Unit Funding," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Debora Scarpato, 2013. "La misurazione della sostenibilit?: alcune esperienze internazionali," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 55-76.
    9. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    10. Tajul Masron & Mduduzi Biyase & Talent Zwane & Thomas Udimal & Frederich Kirsten, 2023. "Ecological footprint and population health outcomes: an analysis of E7 countries," Economics Working Papers edwrg-07-2023, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, revised 2023.
    11. Moritz Bohland & Sebastian Schwenen, 2020. "Technology Policy and Market Structure: Evidence from the Power Sector," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1856, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Zhangsheng Liu & Liuqingqing Yang & Liqin Fan, 2021. "Induced Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation: Evidence from the Increasing-Block Pricing Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Curci, Ylenia & Mongeau Ospina, Christian A., 2016. "Investigating biofuels through network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-72.
    14. Bongsuk Sung & Myoung Shik Choi & Woo-Yong Song, 2019. "Exploring the Effects of Government Policies on Economic Performance: Evidence Using Panel Data for Korean Renewable Energy Technology Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Orsatti, Gianluca & Pezzoni, Michele & Quatraro, Francesco, 2017. "Where Do Green Technologies Come From? Inventor Teams’ Recombinant Capabilities and the Creation of New Knowledge," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201711, University of Turin.
    16. Piotr Gradziuk & Aleksandra Siudek & Anna M. Klepacka & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Anna Trocewicz & Iryna Skorokhod, 2022. "Heat Pump Installation in Public Buildings: Savings and Environmental Benefits in Underserved Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Teixidó-Figueras, J. & Duro, J.A., 2014. "Spatial Polarization of the Ecological Footprint Distribution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 93-106.
    18. Yu-Hong Ai & Di-Yun Peng & Huan-Huan Xiong, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Regulation Intensity on Green Technology Innovation: From the Perspective of Political and Business Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Ren, Shenggang & Hu, Yucai & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Yangjie, 2020. "Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:15:p:5758-:d:883278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.