IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7090-d668480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO 2 Recycling in the Iron and Steel Industry via Power-to-Gas and Oxy-Fuel Combustion

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Perpiñán

    (Escuela de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad de Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Manuel Bailera

    (Escuela de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad de Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan)

  • Luis M. Romeo

    (Escuela de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad de Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Begoña Peña

    (Escuela de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad de Zaragoza, María de Luna 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Valerie Eveloy

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

The iron and steel industry is the largest energy-consuming sector in the world. It is responsible for emitting 4–5% of the total anthropogenic CO 2 . As an energy-intensive industry, it is essential that the iron and steel sector accomplishes important carbon emission reduction. Carbon capture is one of the most promising alternatives to achieve this aim. Moreover, if carbon utilization via power-to-gas is integrated with carbon capture, there could be a significant increase in the interest of this alternative in the iron and steel sector. This paper presents several simulations to integrate oxy-fuel processes and power-to-gas in a steel plant, and compares gas productions (coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, and blast oxygen furnace gas), energy requirements, and carbon reduction with a base case in order to obtain the technical feasibility of the proposals. Two different power-to-gas technology implementations were selected, together with the oxy blast furnace and the top gas recycling technologies. These integrations are based on three strategies: (i) converting the blast furnace (BF) process into an oxy-fuel process, (ii) recirculating blast furnace gas (BFG) back to the BF itself, and (iii) using a methanation process to generate CH 4 and also introduce it to the BF. Applying these improvements to the steel industry, we achieved reductions in CO 2 emissions of up to 8%, and reductions in coal fuel consumption of 12.8%. On the basis of the results, we are able to conclude that the energy required to achieve the above emission savings could be as low as 4.9 MJ/kg CO 2 for the second implementation. These values highlight the importance of carrying out future research in the implementation of carbon capture and power-to-gas in the industrial sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Perpiñán & Manuel Bailera & Luis M. Romeo & Begoña Peña & Valerie Eveloy, 2021. "CO 2 Recycling in the Iron and Steel Industry via Power-to-Gas and Oxy-Fuel Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7090-:d:668480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7090/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7090/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirschen, Marcus & Risonarta, Victor & Pfeifer, Herbert, 2009. "Energy efficiency and the influence of gas burners to the energy related carbon dioxide emissions of electric arc furnaces in steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1065-1072.
    2. Rosenfeld, Daniel C. & Böhm, Hans & Lindorfer, Johannes & Lehner, Markus, 2020. "Scenario analysis of implementing a power-to-gas and biomass gasification system in an integrated steel plant: A techno-economic and environmental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1511-1524.
    3. Wu, Junnian & Wang, Ruiqi & Pu, Guangying & Qi, Hang, 2016. "Integrated assessment of exergy, energy and carbon dioxide emissions in an iron and steel industrial network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 430-444.
    4. Eveloy, Valerie, 2019. "Hybridization of solid oxide electrolysis-based power-to-methane with oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide utilization for energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 550-571.
    5. He, Kun & Wang, Li, 2017. "A review of energy use and energy-efficient technologies for the iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1022-1039.
    6. Quader, M. Abdul & Ahmed, Shamsuddin & Ghazilla, Raja Ariffin Raja & Ahmed, Shameem & Dahari, Mahidzal, 2015. "A comprehensive review on energy efficient CO2 breakthrough technologies for sustainable green iron and steel manufacturing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 594-614.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gyeong-Min Kim & Jae Hyung Choi & Chung-Hwan Jeon & Dong-Ha Lim, 2022. "Effects of Cofiring Coal and Biomass Fuel on the Pulverized Coal Injection Combustion Zone in Blast Furnaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Perpiñán, Jorge & Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Romeo, Luis M. & Eveloy, Valerie, 2023. "Technical and economic assessment of iron and steelmaking decarbonization via power to gas and amine scrubbing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perpiñán, Jorge & Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Romeo, Luis M. & Eveloy, Valerie, 2023. "Technical and economic assessment of iron and steelmaking decarbonization via power to gas and amine scrubbing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Yuancheng Lin & Honghua Yang & Linwei Ma & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2021. "Low-Carbon Development for the Iron and Steel Industry in China and the World: Status Quo, Future Vision, and Key Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-28, November.
    4. Bhadbhade, Navdeep & Zuberi, M. Jibran S. & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "A bottom-up analysis of energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials for the swiss metals sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 173-186.
    5. Michael Bampaou & Kyriakos Panopoulos & Panos Seferlis & Amaia Sasiain & Stephane Haag & Philipp Wolf-Zoellner & Markus Lehner & Leokadia Rog & Przemyslaw Rompalski & Sebastian Kolb & Nina Kieberger &, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Renewable Hydrogen Integration into Steelworks for the Production of Methanol and Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Sergio García García & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Henar Morán Palacios & Adriano Mones Bayo, 2020. "A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model for the Optimization of Steel Waste Gases in Cogeneration: A Combined Coke Oven and Converter Gas Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Liu, Changxin & Xie, Zhihui & Sun, Fengrui & Chen, Lingen, 2017. "Exergy analysis and optimization of coking process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 694-705.
    8. Cheng, Zhilong & Tan, Zhoutuo & Guo, Zhigang & Yang, Jian & Wang, Qiuwang, 2020. "Recent progress in sustainable and energy-efficient technologies for sinter production in the iron and steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Wang, Peng & Zhao, Shen & Dai, Tao & Peng, Kun & Zhang, Qi & Li, Jiashuo & Chen, Wei-Qiang, 2022. "Regional disparities in steel production and restrictions to progress on global decarbonization: A cross-national analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Shuangping Wu & Anjun Xu, 2021. "Calculation Method of Energy Saving in Process Engineering: A Case Study of Iron and Steel Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Wu, Junnian & Pu, Guangying & Guo, Yan & Lv, Jingwen & Shang, Jiangwei, 2018. "Retrospective and prospective assessment of exergy, life cycle carbon emissions, and water footprint for coking network evolution in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 479-493.
    12. Na, Hongming & Sun, Jingchao & Qiu, Ziyang & He, Jianfei & Yuan, Yuxing & Yan, Tianyi & Du, Tao, 2021. "A novel evaluation method for energy efficiency of process industry — A case study of typical iron and steel manufacturing process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2021. "A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Teresa Annunziata Branca & Barbara Fornai & Valentina Colla & Maria Ilaria Pistelli & Eros Luciano Faraci & Filippo Cirilli & Antonius Johannes Schröder, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis and Energy Efficiency in European Process Industries: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-37, August.
    15. Sun, Minmin & Zhang, Jianliang & Li, Kejiang & Barati, Mansoor & Liu, Zhibin, 2022. "Co-gasification characteristics of coke blended with hydro-char and pyro-char from bamboo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Ye, Lian & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Guangwei & Wang, Chen & Mao, Xiaoming & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Li, Jinhua & Wang, Chuan, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of plastic and biomass hydrochar for blast furnace injection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    17. Jie Yang & Shaowen Lu & Liangyong Wang, 2020. "Fused magnesia manufacturing process: a survey," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 327-350, February.
    18. Fábio de Oliveira Neves & Henrique Ewbank & José Arnaldo Frutuoso Roveda & Andrea Trianni & Fernando Pinhabel Marafão & Sandra Regina Monteiro Masalskiene Roveda, 2022. "Economic and Production-Related Implications for Industrial Energy Efficiency: A Logistic Regression Analysis on Cross-Cutting Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Sun, Jingchao & Na, Hongming & Yan, Tianyi & Che, Zichang & Qiu, Ziyang & Yuan, Yuxing & Li, Yingnan & Du, Tao & Song, Yanli & Fang, Xin, 2022. "Cost-benefit assessment of manufacturing system using comprehensive value flow analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7090-:d:668480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.