IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5483-d627985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value Proposition of Different Methods for Utilisation of Sugarcane Wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Ihsan Hamawand

    (Wide Bay Water, Fraser Coast Regional Council, Urangan 4655, Australia)

  • Wilton da Silva

    (Department of Physics, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande 58429-900, Brazil)

  • Saman Seneweera

    (National Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy 20000, Sri Lanka)

  • Jochen Bundschuh

    (Centre for Crop Health, School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Australia)

Abstract

There are four main waste products produced during the harvesting and milling process of sugarcane: cane trash, molasses, bagasse and mill mud–boiler ash mixture. This study investigates the value proposition of different techniques currently not being adopted by the industry in the utilisation of these wastes. The study addresses the technical challenges and the environmental impact associated with these wastes and comes up with some recommendations based on the recent findings in the literature. All the biomass wastes such as bagasse, trash (tops) and trash (leaves) have shown great potential in generating higher revenue by converting them to renewable energy than burning them (wet or dry). However, the energy content in the products from all the utilisation methods is less than the energy content of the raw product. This study has found that the most profitable and challenging choice is producing ethanol or ethanol/biogas from these wastes. The authors recommend conducting more research in this field in order to help the sugar industry to compete in the international market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ihsan Hamawand & Wilton da Silva & Saman Seneweera & Jochen Bundschuh, 2021. "Value Proposition of Different Methods for Utilisation of Sugarcane Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-31, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5483-:d:627985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kent, Anthony & Mercer, David, 2006. "Australia's mandatory renewable energy target (MRET): an assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1046-1062, June.
    2. Pillai, Indu R. & Banerjee, Rangan, 2009. "Renewable energy in India: Status and potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 970-980.
    3. Qureshi, Muhammad Ejaz & Wegener, Malcolm K. & Mallawaarachchi, Thilak, 2001. "The economics of sugar mill waste management in the Australian Sugar Industry: Mill mud case study," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125868, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Hamawand, Ihsan & Sandell, Gary & Pittaway, Pam & Chakrabarty, Sayan & Yusaf, Talal & Chen, Guangnan & Seneweera, Saman & Al-Lwayzy, Saddam & Bennett, John & Hopf, Joshua, 2016. "Bioenergy from Cotton Industry Wastes: A review and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-448.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seok-Jun Kim & Kwang-Cheol Oh & Sun-Yong Park & Young-Min Ju & La-Hoon Cho & Chung-Geon Lee & Min-Jun Kim & In-Seon Jeong & Dae-Hyun Kim, 2021. "Development and Validation of Mass Reduction Prediction Model and Analysis of Fuel Properties for Agro-Byproduct Torrefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. David Muñoz-Rodríguez & Pilar Aparicio-Martínez & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2022. "Contribution of Agroforestry Biomass Valorisation to Energy and Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-7, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makade, Rahul G. & Chakrabarti, Siddharth & Jamil, Basharat & Sakhale, C.N., 2020. "Estimation of global solar radiation for the tropical wet climatic region of India: A theory of experimentation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2044-2059.
    2. Nigel Martin & John Rice, 2010. "Analysing emission intensive firms as regulatory stakeholders: a role for adaptable business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 64-75, January.
    3. Mulder, Peter & de Groot, Henri L.F., 2013. "Dutch sectoral energy intensity developments in international perspective, 1987–2005," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 501-512.
    4. Mahavar, S. & Rajawat, P. & Marwal, V.K. & Punia, R.C. & Dashora, P., 2013. "Modeling and on-field testing of a Solar Rice Cooker," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 404-412.
    5. Darmani, Anna & Rickne, Annika & Hidalgo, Antonio & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2016. "When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-381.
    6. Khaled, Mohamed & Ibrahim, Mostafa M. & Abdel Hamed, Hesham E. & AbdelGwad, Ahmed F., 2019. "Investigation of a small Horizontal–Axis wind turbine performance with and without winglet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Reddy, B. Sudhakara, 2018. "Economic dynamics and technology diffusion in indian power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 425-435.
    8. Ben Jebli, Mehdi & Ben Youssef, Slim, 2014. "Timing of adoption of clean technologies, transboundary pollution and international trade," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-31.
    9. Martin, Nigel J. & Rice, John L., 2012. "Developing renewable energy supply in Queensland, Australia: A study of the barriers, targets, policies and actions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 119-127.
    10. Singh, Rhythm, 2018. "Energy sufficiency aspirations of India and the role of renewable resources: Scenarios for future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2783-2795.
    11. Gonçalves da Silva, C., 2010. "The fossil energy/climate change crunch: Can we pin our hopes on new energy technologies?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1312-1316.
    12. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    13. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2015. "Improving Australia's renewable energy project policy and planning: A multiple stakeholder analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 128-141.
    14. Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed & Zahedi, Gholamreza, 2012. "Greener energy: Issues and challenges for Pakistan—Solar energy prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2762-2780.
    15. Yasir Alsaedi & Gurudeo Anand Tularam & Victor Wong, 2021. "Impact of the Nature of Energy Management and Responses to Policies Regarding Solar and Wind Pricing: A Qualitative Study of the Australian Electricity Markets," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 191-205.
    16. Indora, Sunil & Kandpal, Tara C., 2018. "Institutional and community solar cooking in India using SK-23 and Scheffler solar cookers: A financial appraisal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 501-511.
    17. Singh, G.K. & Kumar, A. Senthil & Saini, R.P., 2010. "Performance evaluation of series compensated self-excited six-phase induction generator for stand-alone renewable energy generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 288-297.
    18. Solangi, K.H. & Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Rahim, N.A. & Fayaz, H., 2011. "A review on global solar energy policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 2149-2163, May.
    19. Strazzabosco, A. & Kenway, S.J. & Conrad, S.A. & Lant, P.A., 2021. "Renewable electricity generation in the Australian water industry: Lessons learned and challenges for the future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Carla Cristiane Sokulski & Murillo Vetroni Barros & Rodrigo Salvador & Evandro Eduardo Broday & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2022. "Trends in Renewable Electricity Generation in the G20 Countries: An Analysis of the 1990–2020 Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5483-:d:627985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.