IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i5p1051-d325474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kinetic Characterization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Apple Pomace as Feedstock for a Sugar-Based Biorefinery

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Procentese

    (Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Maria Elena Russo

    (Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Ilaria Di Somma

    (Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Antonio Marzocchella

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

Abstract

The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose from biomass feedstock in the sugar-based biorefinery chain is penalized by enzyme cost and difficulty to approach the theoretical maximum cellulose conversion degree. As a consequence, the process is currently investigated to identify the best operating conditions with reference to each biomass feedstock. The present work reports an investigation regarding the enzymatic hydrolysis of apple pomace (AP). AP is an agro-food waste largely available in Europe that might be exploited as a sugar source for biorefinery purposes. A biomass pre-treatment step was required before the enzymatic hydrolysis to make available polysaccharides chains to the biocatalyst. The AP samples were pre-treated through alkaline (NaOH), acid (HCl), and enzymatic (laccase) delignification processes to investigate the effect of lignin content and polysaccharides composition on enzymatic hydrolysis. Enzymatic hydrolysis tests were carried out using a commercial cocktail (Cellic ® CTec2) of cellulolytic enzymes. The effect of mixing speed and biomass concentration on the experimental overall glucose production rate was assessed. The characterization of the glucose production rate by the assessment of pseudo-homogeneous kinetic models was proposed. Data were analysed to assess kinetic parameters of pseudo-mechanistic models able to describe the glucose production rate during AP enzymatic hydrolysis. In particular, pseudo-homogeneous Michaelis and Menten, as well as Chrastil’s models were used. The effect of lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis rate was evaluated. Chrastil’s model provided the best description of the glucose production rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Procentese & Maria Elena Russo & Ilaria Di Somma & Antonio Marzocchella, 2020. "Kinetic Characterization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Apple Pomace as Feedstock for a Sugar-Based Biorefinery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1051-:d:325474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parajuli, Ranjan & Dalgaard, Tommy & Jørgensen, Uffe & Adamsen, Anders Peter S. & Knudsen, Marie Trydeman & Birkved, Morten & Gylling, Morten & Schjørring, Jan Kofod, 2015. "Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: a review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 244-263.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Urbanowska & Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz & Christian Aragon-Briceño & Mateusz Wnukowski & Artur Pożarlik & Lukasz Niedzwiecki & Marcin Baranowski & Michał Czerep & Przemysław Seruga & Hali, 2021. "Cascade Membrane System for Separation of Water and Organics from Liquid By-Products of HTC of the Agricultural Digestate—Evaluation of Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Deslin Nadar & Kubendren Naicker & David Lokhat, 2020. "Ultrasonically-Assisted Dissolution of Sugarcane Bagasse during Dilute Acid Pretreatment: Experiments and Kinetic Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yazan, Devrim Murat & Mandras, Giovanni & Garau, Giorgio, 2017. "Environmental and economic sustainability of integrated production in bio-refineries: The thistle case in Sardinia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 349-360.
    2. Carneiro, Maria Luisa N.M. & Pradelle, Florian & Braga, Sergio L. & Gomes, Marcos Sebastião P. & Martins, Ana Rosa F.A. & Turkovics, Franck & Pradelle, Renata N.C., 2017. "Potential of biofuels from algae: Comparison with fossil fuels, ethanol and biodiesel in Europe and Brazil through life cycle assessment (LCA)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 632-653.
    3. Ng, Rex T.L. & Fasahati, Peyman & Huang, Kefeng & Maravelias, Christos T., 2019. "Utilizing stillage in the biorefinery: Economic, technological and energetic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 491-503.
    4. Liesbeth de Schutter & Stefan Giljum & Tiina Häyhä & Martin Bruckner & Asjad Naqvi & Ines Omann & Sigrid Stagl, 2019. "Bioeconomy Transitions through the Lens of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems: A Framework for Place-Based Responsibility in the Global Resource System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Noonari, A.A. & Mahar, R.B. & Sahito, A.R. & Brohi, K.M., 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of canola straw and banana plant wastes with buffalo dung: Effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on methane yield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1046-1054.
    6. Francesca Demichelis & Francesco Piovano & Silvia Fiore, 2019. "Biowaste Management in Italy: Challenges and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Sadhukhan, Jhuma & Martinez-Hernandez, Elias & Murphy, Richard J. & Ng, Denny K.S. & Hassim, Mimi H. & Siew Ng, Kok & Yoke Kin, Wan & Jaye, Ida Fahani Md & Leung Pah Hang, Melissa Y. & Andiappan, Vikn, 2018. "Role of bioenergy, biorefinery and bioeconomy in sustainable development: Strategic pathways for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1966-1987.
    8. Alessandra Cesaro & Vincenzo Belgiorno, 2015. "Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 2: Mainstream and downstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1392-1407.
    10. Jonas Zetterholm & Elina Bryngemark & Johan Ahlström & Patrik Söderholm & Simon Harvey & Elisabeth Wetterlund, 2020. "Economic Evaluation of Large-Scale Biorefinery Deployment: A Framework Integrating Dynamic Biomass Market and Techno-Economic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Ouhimmou, Mustapha & Rönnqvist, Mikael & Lapointe, Louis-Alexandre, 2021. "Assessment of sustainable integration of new products into value chain through a generic decision support model: An application to the forest value chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Dubis, Bogdan & Sokólski, Mateusz Mikołaj & Załuski, Dariusz & Bórawski, Piotr & Szempliński, Władysław, 2019. "Biomass yield and energy balance of Virginia fanpetals in different production technologies in north-eastern Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 612-623.
    13. Kafle, Sagar & Parajuli, Ranjan & Bhattarai, Sujala & Euh, Seung Hee & Kim, Dae Hyun, 2017. "A review on energy systems and GHG emissions reduction plan and policy of the Republic of Korea: Past, present, and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1123-1130.
    14. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.
    15. Ge, Yuntian & Li, Lin & Yun, Lingxiang, 2021. "Modeling and economic optimization of cellulosic biofuel supply chain considering multiple conversion pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    16. Scaldaferri, C.A. & Pasa, V.M.D., 2019. "Green diesel production from upgrading of cashew nut shell liquid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 303-313.
    17. Shaghaleh, Hiba & Xu, Xu & Liu, He & Wang, Shifa & Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Dong, Fuhao & Luo, Jinyue, 2019. "The effect of atmospheric pressure plasma pretreatment with various gases on the structural characteristics and chemical composition of wheat straw and applications to enzymatic hydrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 195-210.
    18. Jung, Jong-Min & Kim, Sok & Lee, Jechan & Oh, Jeong Ik & Choi, Yoon-E. & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2019. "Tailoring pyrogenic products from pyrolysis of defatted Euglena gracilis using CO2 as reactive gas medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 184-190.
    19. Furtado Júnior, Juarez Corrêa & Palacio, José Carlos Escobar & Leme, Rafael Coradi & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & da Costa, José Eduardo Loureiro & Reyes, Arnaldo Martín Martínez & del Olmo, Oscar Alm, 2020. "Biorefineries productive alternatives optimization in the brazilian sugar and alcohol industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Tim Patterson & Jaime Massanet‐Nicolau & Rhys Jones & Alessio Boldrin & Francesco Valentino & Richard Dinsdale & Alan Guwy, 2021. "Utilizing grass for the biological production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) via green biorefining: Material and energy flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 802-815, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1051-:d:325474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.