IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5838-d441937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catchment Based Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of Small Wind Turbine Using a Single Blade Concept for a Low Cost of Energy

Author

Listed:
  • Hailay Kiros Kelele

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, KolbjørnHejes v 1B, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Mekelle University, P.O. Box 231 Mekelle, Ethiopia)

  • Torbjørn Kirstian Nielsen

    (Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, KolbjørnHejes v 1B, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Lars Froyd

    (4Subsea AS, Hagaløkkveien 26, 1383 Asker, Norway)

  • Mulu Bayray Kahsay

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Mekelle University, P.O. Box 231 Mekelle, Ethiopia)

Abstract

For low and medium wind conditions, there is a possibility to harness maximum wind potential reducing the cost of energy by employing catchment-based wind turbine designs. This paper aims to study catchment-based small wind turbine aerodynamic performance for improved efficiency and reduced cost of energy. Hence, design parameters are considered based on specific conditions within a catchment area. The bins and statistical methods implemented with Weibull distribution of wind data for selected sites to characterize the wind conditions and a weighted average method proposed to create representative wind conditions implementing a single blade concept. The blade element method was applied using Matlab code (version R2017a, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, US) for aerodynamic design and analysis, and computational fluid dynamics employed using ANSYS—Fluent (version 18.1, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA) for validation. The performance of the designed blade is evaluated based on annual energy production, capacity factor and power coefficient. Then, for site-specific wind conditions, yearly energy production, and relative cost of energy are examined against rated power. Appropriate rated power for a low cost of energy identified and performance measures evaluated for each site. As a result, a maximum power coefficient of around 51.8% achieved at a design wind speed of 10 m/s, and higher capacity factors of 28% and 50.9% respectively attained for the low and high wind conditions at the proposed rated powers. Therefore, for different wind condition sites, enhanced performance at a low cost of energy could be achieved using a single blade concept at properly selected rated powers employing suitable design conditions and procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailay Kiros Kelele & Torbjørn Kirstian Nielsen & Lars Froyd & Mulu Bayray Kahsay, 2020. "Catchment Based Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of Small Wind Turbine Using a Single Blade Concept for a Low Cost of Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5838-:d:441937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fei-Bin Hsiao & Chi-Jeng Bai & Wen-Tong Chong, 2013. "The Performance Test of Three Different Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) Blade Shapes Using Experimental and Numerical Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Perkin, Samuel & Garrett, Deon & Jensson, Pall, 2015. "Optimal wind turbine selection methodology: A case-study for Búrfell, Iceland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 165-172.
    3. Bai, Chi-Jeng & Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2016. "Review of computational and experimental approaches to analysis of aerodynamic performance in horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 506-519.
    4. Lanzafame, R. & Mauro, S. & Messina, M., 2013. "Wind turbine CFD modeling using a correlation-based transitional model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 31-39.
    5. Abdullah, M.A. & Yatim, A.H.M. & Tan, C.W. & Saidur, R., 2012. "A review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for wind energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3220-3227.
    6. Karthikeyan, N. & Kalidasa Murugavel, K. & Arun Kumar, S. & Rajakumar, S., 2015. "Review of aerodynamic developments on small horizontal axis wind turbine blade," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 801-822.
    7. Li, Yuwei & Paik, Kwang-Jun & Xing, Tao & Carrica, Pablo M., 2012. "Dynamic overset CFD simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 285-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hailay Kiros Kelele & Lars Frøyd & Mulu Bayray Kahsay & Torbjørn Kristian Nielsen, 2022. "Characterization of Aerodynamics of Small Wind Turbine Blade for Enhanced Performance and Low Cost of Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thé, Jesse & Yu, Hesheng, 2017. "A critical review on the simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics focusing on hybrid RANS-LES methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-289.
    2. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2020. "URANS simulations of a horizontal axis wind turbine under stall condition using Reynolds stress turbulence models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Hailay Kiros Kelele & Lars Frøyd & Mulu Bayray Kahsay & Torbjørn Kristian Nielsen, 2022. "Characterization of Aerodynamics of Small Wind Turbine Blade for Enhanced Performance and Low Cost of Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Jijian Lian & Yaya Jia & Haijun Wang & Fang Liu, 2016. "Numerical Study of the Aerodynamic Loads on Offshore Wind Turbines under Typhoon with Full Wind Direction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Lin, Yan-Ting & Chiu, Pao-Hsiung & Huang, Chin-Cheng, 2017. "An experimental and numerical investigation on the power performance of 150 kW horizontal axis wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 85-93.
    6. Mauro, S. & Lanzafame, R. & Messina, M. & Brusca, S., 2023. "On the importance of the root-to-hub adapter effects on HAWT performance: A CFD-BEM numerical investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Zhang, Sanxia & Luo, Kun & Yuan, Renyu & Wang, Qiang & Wang, Jianwen & Zhang, Liru & Fan, Jianren, 2018. "Influences of operating parameters on the aerodynamics and aeroacoustics of a horizontal-axis wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 597-611.
    8. Ke Song & Huiting Huan & Yuchi Kang, 2022. "Aerodynamic Performance and Wake Characteristics Analysis of Archimedes Spiral Wind Turbine Rotors with Different Blade Angle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Liu, Pengyin & Yu, Guohua & Zhu, Xiaocheng & Du, Zhaohui, 2014. "Unsteady aerodynamic prediction for dynamic stall of wind turbine airfoils with the reduced order modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 402-409.
    10. Dallatu Abbas Umar & Chong Tak Yaw & Siaw Paw Koh & Sieh Kiong Tiong & Ammar Ahmed Alkahtani & Talal Yusaf, 2022. "Design and Optimization of a Small-Scale Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade for Energy Harvesting at Low Wind Profile Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Ali, Qazi Shahzad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2021. "Design and performance analysis of an airborne wind turbine for high-altitude energy harvesting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Regodeseves, P. García & Morros, C. Santolaria, 2020. "Unsteady numerical investigation of the full geometry of a horizontal axis wind turbine: Flow through the rotor and wake," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Yilmaz, Oktay, 2023. "Low-speed, low induction multi-blade rotor for energy efficient small wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Lee, Kyoungsoo & Huque, Ziaul & Kommalapati, Raghava & Han, Sang-Eul, 2017. "Fluid-structure interaction analysis of NREL phase VI wind turbine: Aerodynamic force evaluation and structural analysis using FSI analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 512-531.
    15. Shafiqur Rehman & Md. Mahbub Alam & Luai M. Alhems & M. Mujahid Rafique, 2018. "Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade Design Methodologies for Efficiency Enhancement—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-34, February.
    16. Farhan, A. & Hassanpour, A. & Burns, A. & Motlagh, Y. Ghaffari, 2019. "Numerical study of effect of winglet planform and airfoil on a horizontal axis wind turbine performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1255-1273.
    17. Nour Khlaifat & Ali Altaee & John Zhou & Yuhan Huang & Ali Braytee, 2020. "Optimization of a Small Wind Turbine for a Rural Area: A Case Study of Deniliquin, New South Wales, Australia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Ali, Qazi Shahzad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "Power conversion performance of airborne wind turbine under unsteady loads," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Lee, Kyoungsoo & Huque, Ziaul & Kommalapati, Raghava & Han, Sang-Eul, 2016. "Evaluation of equivalent structural properties of NREL phase VI wind turbine blade," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 796-818.
    20. Wang, Ying & Li, Gaohui & Shen, Sheng & Huang, Diangui & Zheng, Zhongquan, 2018. "Investigation on aerodynamic performance of horizontal axis wind turbine by setting micro-cylinder in front of the blade leading edge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1107-1124.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5838-:d:441937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.