IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i7p1200-d217780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Large-Scale Production of Chitosan Microbeads Modified with Nanoparticles Based on Exergy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Samir Meramo-Hurtado

    (Nanomaterials and Computer Aided Process Engineering Research Group (NIPAC), University of Cartagena, Cartagena 130015, Colombia)

  • Adriana Herrera-Barros

    (Nanomaterials and Computer Aided Process Engineering Research Group (NIPAC), University of Cartagena, Cartagena 130015, Colombia)

  • Ángel González-Delgado

    (Nanomaterials and Computer Aided Process Engineering Research Group (NIPAC), University of Cartagena, Cartagena 130015, Colombia)

Abstract

Novel technologies for bio-adsorbent production are being evaluated on the lab-scale in order to find the most adequate processing alternative under technical parameters. However, the poor energy efficiency of promising technologies can be a drawback for large-scale production of these bio-adsorbents. In this work, exergy analysis was used as a computer-aided tool to evaluate from the energy point of view, the behavior of three bio-adsorbent production topologies at large scale for obtaining chitosan microbeads modified with magnetic and photocatalytic nanoparticles. The routes were modeled using an industrial process simulation software, based on experimental results and information reported in literature. Mass, energy and exergy balances were performed for each alternative, physical and chemical exergies of streams and chemical species were calculated according to the thermodynamic properties of biomass components and operating conditions of stages. Exergy efficiencies, total process irreversibilities, energy consumption, and exergy destruction were calculated for all routes. Route 2 presents the highest process irreversibilities and route 3 has the highest exergy of utilities. Exergy efficiencies were similar for all simulated cases, which did not allow to choose the best alternative under energy viewpoint. Exergy sinks for each topology were detected. As values of exergy efficiency were under 3%, it was shown that there are process improvement opportunities in product drying stages and washing water recovery for the three routes.

Suggested Citation

  • Samir Meramo-Hurtado & Adriana Herrera-Barros & Ángel González-Delgado, 2019. "Evaluation of Large-Scale Production of Chitosan Microbeads Modified with Nanoparticles Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:7:p:1200-:d:217780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/7/1200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/7/1200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peralta-Ruiz, Y. & González-Delgado, A.-D. & Kafarov, V., 2013. "Evaluation of alternatives for microalgae oil extraction based on exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 226-236.
    2. Daissy Lorena Restrepo-Serna & Jimmy Anderson Martínez-Ruano & Carlos Ariel Cardona-Alzate, 2018. "Energy Efficiency of Biorefinery Schemes Using Sugarcane Bagasse as Raw Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    4. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mandegari, Mohsen & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Farzad, Somayeh & Mojarab Soufiyan, Mohamad & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 623-638.
    5. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Yang, Kun & Xu, Zi-Long & Fu, Chao, 2015. "Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated CCHP system with biomass air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 317-327.
    6. Ojeda, Karina & Sánchez, Eduardo & Kafarov, Viatcheslav, 2011. "Sustainable ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass – Application of exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2119-2128.
    7. Serena Righi & Filippo Baioli & Alessandro Dal Pozzo & Alessandro Tugnoli, 2018. "Integrating Life Cycle Inventory and Process Design Techniques for the Early Estimate of Energy and Material Consumption Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kannan Karunakaran & Muhammad Usman & Mika Sillanpää, 2022. "A Review on Superadsorbents with Adsorption Capacity ≥1000 mg g −1 and Perspectives on Their Upscaling for Water/Wastewater Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Kariana Andrea Moreno-Sader & Jairo David Martínez-Consuegra & Ángel Darío González-Delgado, 2020. "Assessing the Exergetic and Inherent Safety Performance of a Shrimp-Based Biorefinery via Computer-Aided Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Jiří Jaromír Klemeš & Petar Sabev Varbanov & Paweł Ocłoń & Hon Huin Chin, 2019. "Towards Efficient and Clean Process Integration: Utilisation of Renewable Resources and Energy-Saving Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-32, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kariana Andrea Moreno-Sader & Jairo David Martínez-Consuegra & Ángel Darío González-Delgado, 2020. "Assessing the Exergetic and Inherent Safety Performance of a Shrimp-Based Biorefinery via Computer-Aided Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Li, Jiaxi & Wang, Dan & Jia, Hongjie & Lei, Yang & Zhou, Tianshuo & Guo, Ying, 2022. "Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    3. Martínez González, Aldemar & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2019. "Syngas production from oil sludge gasification and its potential use in power generation systems: An energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1190.
    4. Forlin Bertel-Pérez & Grisel Cogollo-Cárcamo & Ángel Darío González-Delgado, 2023. "Assessing Exergy Efficiency in Computer-Aided Modeled Large-Scale Production of Chitosan Microbeads Modified with Thiourea and Magnetite Nanoparticles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Moreno-Sader, K. & Meramo-Hurtado, S.I. & González-Delgado, A.D., 2019. "Computer-aided environmental and exergy analysis as decision-making tools for selecting bio-oil feedstocks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 42-57.
    6. Martínez González, Aldemar & Lesme Jaén, René & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo, 2020. "Thermodynamic assessment of the integrated gasification-power plant operating in the sawmill industry: An energy and exergy analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1151-1163.
    7. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    8. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Motevali, Ali & Ghobadian, Barat, 2019. "Ethanol production from date wastes: Adapted technologies, challenges, and global potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1094-1110.
    10. Francis Chinweuba Eboh & Peter Ahlström & Tobias Richards, 2017. "Exergy Analysis of Solid Fuel-Fired Heat and Power Plants: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-29, February.
    11. Su, Bosheng & Han, Wei & Zhang, Xiaosong & Chen, Yi & Wang, Zefeng & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Assessment of a combined cooling, heating and power system by synthetic use of biogas and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 922-935.
    12. Diego Perrone & Teresa Castiglione & Pietropaolo Morrone & Ferdinando Pantano & Sergio Bova, 2023. "Energetic, Economic and Environmental Performance Analysis of a Micro-Combined Cooling, Heating and Power (CCHP) System Based on Biomass Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    14. Goh, Brandon Han Hoe & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Cheah, Mei Yee & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Yu, Kai Ling & Mahlia, Teuku Meurah Indra, 2019. "Sustainability of direct biodiesel synthesis from microalgae biomass: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-74.
    15. Khalili-Garakani, Amirhossein & Ivakpour, Javad & Kasiri, Norollah, 2016. "Evolutionary synthesis of optimum light ends recovery unit with exergy analysis application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 507-522.
    16. Thapat Silalertruksa & Chanipa Wirodcharuskul & Shabbir H. Gheewala, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability of Waste Circulation Models for Sugarcane Biorefinery System in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Liu, Chenglin & Zhao, Lei & Zhu, Shun & Shen, Yuefeng & Yu, Jianhua & Yang, Qingchun, 2023. "Advanced exergy analysis and optimization of a coal to ethylene glycol (CtEG) process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    19. Thomassen, Gwenny & Van Dael, Miet & Lemmens, Bert & Van Passel, Steven, 2017. "A review of the sustainability of algal-based biorefineries: Towards an integrated assessment framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 876-887.
    20. Marco Castellini & Stefano Ubertini & Diego Barletta & Ilaria Baffo & Pietro Buzzini & Marco Barbanera, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Microbial Oil Using Cardoon Stalks as Carbon Source," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:7:p:1200-:d:217780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.