IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i6p1431-d150422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability Assessment of Power Systems with Photovoltaic Power Stations Based on Intelligent State Space Reduction and Pseudo-Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxia Liu

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Dapeng Guo

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yahui Xu

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Rui Cheng

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Zhiqiang Wang

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yueqiao Li

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

As the number and capacity of photovoltaic (PV) power stations increase, it is of great significance to evaluate the PV-connected power systems in an effective, reasonable, and quick way. In order to overcome the challenge of PV’s time-sequential characteristic and improve upon the computational efficiency, this paper presents a new methodology to evaluate the reliability of the power system with photovoltaic power stations, which combines intelligent state space reduction and a pseudo-sequential Monte Carlo simulation (PMCS). First, a non-aggregate Markov model of photovoltaic output is established, which effectively retains some time-sequential representation of the PV output. Then, the differential evolution algorithm (DE) is introduced into the sampling stage of PMCS to carry out an intelligent state space reduction (ISSR). By using the DE algorithm, success states are searched out and removed, thus the state space is reduced and formed with a high density of loss-of-load. Hence, unnecessary samplings are avoided, which optimizes the PMCS sampling mechanism and improves the computational efficiency. Finally, the proposed method is tested in the modified IEEE RTS-79 system. The results indicate that this new method has a better computational efficiency than the time-sequential Monte Carlo simulation method (TMCS) and pure PMCS. In addition, the effectiveness and feasibility of this method are also verified.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxia Liu & Dapeng Guo & Yahui Xu & Rui Cheng & Zhiqiang Wang & Yueqiao Li, 2018. "Reliability Assessment of Power Systems with Photovoltaic Power Stations Based on Intelligent State Space Reduction and Pseudo-Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1431-:d:150422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/6/1431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alban, Andres & Darji, Hardik A. & Imamura, Atsuki & Nakayama, Marvin K., 2017. "Efficient Monte Carlo methods for estimating failure probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 376-394.
    2. Mosadeghy, Mehdi & Yan, Ruifeng & Saha, Tapan Kumar, 2016. "Impact of PV penetration level on the capacity value of South Australian wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1135-1142.
    3. Ali Kadhem, Athraa & Abdul Wahab, Noor Izzri & Aris, Ishak & Jasni, Jasronita & Abdalla, Ahmed N., 2017. "Computational techniques for assessing the reliability and sustainability of electrical power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1175-1186.
    4. Zhang, Peng & Li, Wenyuan & Li, Sherwin & Wang, Yang & Xiao, Weidong, 2013. "Reliability assessment of photovoltaic power systems: Review of current status and future perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 822-833.
    5. Zhou, P. & Jin, R.Y. & Fan, L.W., 2016. "Reliability and economic evaluation of power system with renewables: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 537-547.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luís F. N. Lourenço & Filipe Perez & Alessio Iovine & Gilney Damm & Renato M. Monaro & Maurício B. C. Salles, 2021. "Stability Analysis of Grid-Forming MMC-HVDC Transmission Connected to Legacy Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Huaizhi Wang & Xian Zhang & Qing Li & Guibin Wang & Hui Jiang & Jianchun Peng, 2018. "Recursive Method for Distribution System Reliability Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Libor Dražan & René Križan & Miroslav Popela, 2021. "Design and Testing of a Low-Tech DEW Generator for Determining Electromagnetic Immunity of Standard Electronic Circuits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Hak-Ju Lee & Byeong-Chan Oh & Seok-Woong Kim & Sung-Yul Kim, 2020. "V2G Strategy for Improvement of Distribution Network Reliability Considering Time Space Network of EVs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    5. You Zhou & Chuan He, 2022. "A Review on Reliability of Integrated Electricity-Gas System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamza Abunima & Jiashen Teh & Ching-Ming Lai & Hussein Jumma Jabir, 2018. "A Systematic Review of Reliability Studies on Composite Power Systems: A Coherent Taxonomy Motivations, Open Challenges, Recommendations, and New Research Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    2. Beyza, Jesus & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "The effects of the high penetration of renewable energies on the reliability and vulnerability of interconnected electric power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Peters, Lennart & Madlener, Reinhard, 2017. "Economic evaluation of maintenance strategies for ground-mounted solar photovoltaic plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 264-280.
    4. Hung, Duong Quoc & Mithulananthan, N. & Bansal, R.C., 2014. "An optimal investment planning framework for multiple distributed generation units in industrial distribution systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 62-72.
    5. Jiang, Sufan & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Zhao, Xin & Liu, Yu & Guo, Yasen & Wang, Sicheng, 2020. "A novel robust security constrained unit commitment model considering HVDC regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Polleux, Louis & Guerassimoff, Gilles & Marmorat, Jean-Paul & Sandoval-Moreno, John & Schuhler, Thierry, 2022. "An overview of the challenges of solar power integration in isolated industrial microgrids with reliability constraints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2017. "Measurement of returns to scale on large photovoltaic power stations in the United States and Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 306-320.
    8. Jannesar, Mohammad Rasol & Sedighi, Alireza & Savaghebi, Mehdi & Guerrero, Josep M., 2018. "Optimal placement, sizing, and daily charge/discharge of battery energy storage in low voltage distribution network with high photovoltaic penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 957-966.
    9. Mariia Kozlova & Alena Lohrmann, 2021. "Steering Renewable Energy Investments in Favor of Energy System Reliability: A Call for a Hybrid Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2014. "Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: A comparative study by data envelopment analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 271-288.
    11. Krupenev, Dmitry & Boyarkin, Denis & Iakubovskii, Dmitrii, 2020. "Improvement in the computational efficiency of a technique for assessing the reliability of electric power systems based on the Monte Carlo method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    12. Maradin Dario & Cerović Ljerka & Mjeda Trina, 2017. "Economic Effects of Renewable Energy Technologies," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 63(2), pages 49-59, June.
    13. Cai, Baoping & Liu, Yonghong & Ma, Yunpeng & Huang, Lei & Liu, Zengkai, 2015. "A framework for the reliability evaluation of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in the presence of intermittent faults," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1308-1320.
    14. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    15. Li, Zai-Wei & Zhou, Yun-Lai & Liu, Xiao-Zhou & Abdel Wahab, Magd, 2023. "Service reliability assessment of ballastless track in high speed railway via improved response surface method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    16. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2018. "An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 195-206.
    17. Saheed Lekan Gbadamosi & Nnamdi I. Nwulu, 2020. "Optimal Power Dispatch and Reliability Analysis of Hybrid CHP-PV-Wind Systems in Farming Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Bianchi, M. & Branchini, L. & Ferrari, C. & Melino, F., 2014. "Optimal sizing of grid-independent hybrid photovoltaic–battery power systems for household sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 805-816.
    19. Obara, Shin’ya & Morizane, Yuta & Morel, Jorge, 2013. "Study on method of electricity and heat storage planning based on energy demand and tidal flow velocity forecasts for a tidal microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 358-373.
    20. Spertino, Filippo & Corona, Fabio, 2013. "Monitoring and checking of performance in photovoltaic plants: A tool for design, installation and maintenance of grid-connected systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 722-732.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:1431-:d:150422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.