IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i10p2541-d171661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Interactions between Hydraulic and Natural Fractures in Shale Formations

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Chang

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yintong Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Jun Zhou

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xuehang Song

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China)

  • Chunhe Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Natural fractures (NFs) have been recognized as the dominant factors that increase hydraulic fracture complexity and reservoir productivity. However, the interactions between hydraulic and natural fractures are far from being fully understood. In this study, a two-dimensional numerical model based on the displacement discontinuity method (DDM) has been developed and used to investigate the interaction between hydraulic and pre-existing natural fractures. The inelastic deformation, e.g., stick, slip and separation, of the geologic discontinuities is captured by a special friction joint element called Mohr-Coulomb joint element. The dynamic stress transfer mechanisms between the two fracture systems and the possible location of secondary tensile fracture that reinitiates along the opposite sides of the NF are discussed. Furthermore, the model results are validated by a series of large tri-axial hydraulic fracture (HF) tests. Both experimental and numerical results showed that the displacements and stresses along the NFs are all in highly dynamic changes. When the HF is approaching the NF, the HF tip can exert remote compressional and shear stresses on the NF interface, which results in the debonding of the NF. The location and value of the evoked stress is a function of the far-field horizontal differential stress, inclination angle of the NF, and the net pressure used in fracturing. For a small approaching angle, the stress peak is located farther away from the intersection point, so an offset fracture is more likely to be generated. The cemented strength of the NF also has an important influence on the interaction mechanism. Weakly bonded NF surfaces increase the occurrence of a shear slippage, but for a moderate strength NF, the hybrid failure model with both tensile and shear failures, and conversion may appear.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Chang & Yintong Guo & Jun Zhou & Xuehang Song & Chunhe Yang, 2018. "Numerical and Experimental Investigations of the Interactions between Hydraulic and Natural Fractures in Shale Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:10:p:2541-:d:171661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lianchong Li & Yingjie Xia & Bo Huang & Liaoyuan Zhang & Ming Li & Aishan Li, 2016. "The Behaviour of Fracture Growth in Sedimentary Rocks: A Numerical Study Based on Hydraulic Fracturing Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Zhaobin Zhang & Xiao Li, 2016. "Numerical Study on the Formation of Shear Fracture Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Robert W. Gilmer & Emily Kerr, 2010. "Natural gas from shale: Texas revolution goes global," Southwest Economy, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Q3, pages 10-13.
    4. Weijun Shen & Xizhe Li & Yanmei Xu & Yuping Sun & Weigang Huang, 2017. "Gas Flow Behavior of Nanoscale Pores in Shale Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu Yang & Boyun Guo & Xiaohui Zhang, 2019. "An Analytical Model for Capturing the Decline of Fracture Conductivity in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Trend from Production Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Lingyun Kong & Mehdi Ostadhassan & Siavash Zamiran & Bo Liu & Chunxiao Li & Gennaro G. Marino, 2019. "Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peters, Jeffrey C., 2017. "Natural gas and spillover from the US Clean Power Plan into the Paris Agreement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 41-47.
    2. Chuanliang Yan & Yuanfang Cheng & Fucheng Deng & Ji Tian, 2017. "Permeability Change Caused by Stress Damage of Gas Shale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng, 2019. "Integrating linear and nonlinear forecasting techniques based on grey theory and artificial intelligence to forecast shale gas monthly production in Pennsylvania and Texas of the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 781-803.
    4. José Reinoso & Percy Durand & Pattabhi Ramaiah Budarapu & Marco Paggi, 2019. "Crack Patterns in Heterogenous Rocks Using a Combined Phase Field-Cohesive Interface Modeling Approach: A Numerical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Justin Caron & Stuart M. Cohen & Maxwell Brown & John M. Reilly, 2018. "Exploring The Impacts Of A National U.S. Co2 Tax And Revenue Recycling Options With A Coupled Electricity-Economy Model," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(01), pages 1-40, February.
    6. Tianjiao Li & Chun’an Tang & Jonny Rutqvist & Mengsu Hu & Lianchong Li & Liaoyuan Zhang & Bo Huang, 2020. "The Influence of an Interlayer on Dual Hydraulic Fractures Propagation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Centner, Terence J., 2016. "Reducing pollution at five critical points of shale gas production: Strategies and institutional responses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 40-46.
    8. Yue Li & Jianye Mou & Shicheng Zhang & Xinfang Ma & Cong Xiao & Haoqing Fang, 2022. "Numerical Investigation of Interaction Mechanism between Hydraulic Fracture and Natural Karst Cave Based on Seepage-Stress-Damage Coupled Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Yingjie Xia & Chuanqing Zhang & Hui Zhou & Chunsheng Zhang & Wangbing Hong, 2019. "Mechanical Anisotropy and Failure Characteristics of Columnar Jointed Rock Masses (CJRM) in Baihetan Hydropower Station: Structural Considerations Based on Digital Image Processing Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Weihong Peng & Menglin Du & Feng Gao & Xuan Dong & Hongmei Cheng, 2018. "A New Analysis Model for Potential Contamination of a Shallow Aquifer from a Hydraulically-Fractured Shale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Kun Ai & Longchen Duan & Hui Gao & Guangliang Jia, 2018. "Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Optimization for Low Permeability Reservoirs Based on Unified Fracture Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Qiuping Qin & Qingfeng Xue & Zizhuo Ma & Yikang Zheng & Hongyu Zhai, 2021. "Hydraulic Fracturing Simulations with Real-Time Evolution of Physical Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    13. Yiyu Lu & Yugang Cheng & Zhaolong Ge & Liang Cheng & Shaojie Zuo & Jianyu Zhong, 2016. "Determination of Fracture Initiation Locations during Cross-Measure Drilling for Hydraulic Fracturing of Coal Seams," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Oglend, Atle & Kleppe, Tore Selland & Osmundsen, Petter, 2016. "Trade with endogenous transportation costs: The case of liquefied natural gas," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 138-148.
    15. Middleton, Richard S. & Carey, J. William & Currier, Robert P. & Hyman, Jeffrey D. & Kang, Qinjun & Karra, Satish & Jiménez-Martínez, Joaquín & Porter, Mark L. & Viswanathan, Hari S., 2015. "Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 500-509.
    16. Qian Li & Yiyu Lu & Zhaolong Ge & Zhe Zhou & Jingwei Zheng & Songqiang Xiao, 2017. "A New Tree-Type Fracturing Method for Stimulating Coal Seam Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Lianchong Li & Mingyang Zhai & Liaoyuan Zhang & Zilin Zhang & Bo Huang & Aishan Li & Jiaqiang Zuo & Quansheng Zhang, 2019. "Brittleness Evaluation of Glutenite Based On Energy Balance and Damage Evolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Ringsmuth, Andrew K. & Landsberg, Michael J. & Hankamer, Ben, 2016. "Can photosynthesis enable a global transition from fossil fuels to solar fuels, to mitigate climate change and fuel-supply limitations?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 134-163.
    19. Atle Oglend & Petter Osmundsen & Tore Selland Kleppe, 2015. "Trade with Endogenous Transportation Costs: The Value of LNG Exports," CESifo Working Paper Series 5222, CESifo.
    20. Wang, Qiang & Chen, Xi & Jha, Awadhesh N. & Rogers, Howard, 2014. "Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:10:p:2541-:d:171661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.